Bouscasse Hélène, Gabet Stephan, Kerneis Glen, Provent Ariane, Rieux Camille, Ben Salem Nabil, Dupont Harry, Troude Florence, Mathy Sandrine, Slama Rémy
CESAER, Agrosup Dijon, INRAE, Bourgogne Franche-Comté Univ., Dijon, France.
Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, CNRS, Team of Environmental Epidemiology Applied to Reproduction and Respiratory Health, IAB, 38000 Grenoble, France.
Environ Int. 2022 Jan 15;159:107030. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.107030. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
Policies aiming at decreasing air pollutants (e.g., fine particulate matter, PM) are often designed without targeting an explicit health benefit nor carrying out cost-benefit analyses.
We developed a transdisciplinary backward and forward approach at the conurbation level: from health objectives set by local decision-makers, we estimated which reductions in PM exposures and emissions would allow to reach them, and identified urban policies leading to these reductions (backward approach). We finally conducted health impact and cost-benefit analyses of these policies (forward approach). The policies were related to the most emitting sectors in the considered area (Grenoble, France), wood heating and transport sectors. The forward approach also considered the health impact and co-benefits of these policies related to changes in physical activity and CO emissions.
Decision-makers set three health targets, corresponding to decreases by 33% to 67% in PM-attributable mortality in 2030, compared to 2016. A decrease by 42% in PM exposure (from 13.9 µg/m) was required to reach the decrease by 67% in PM-attributable mortality. For each Euro invested, the total benefit was about 30€ for policies focusing on wood heating, and 1 to 68€ for traffic policies. Acting on a single sector was not enough to attain a 67% decrease in PM-attributable mortality. This target could be achieved by replacing all inefficient wood heating equipment by low-emission pellet stoves and reducing by 36% the traffic of private motorized vehicles. This would require to increase the share of active modes (walking, biking…), inducing increases in physical activity and additional health benefits beyond the initial target. Annual net benefits were between €484 and €629 per capita for policies with report on active modes, compared to between €162 and €270 without.
Urban policies strongly reducing air pollution-attributable mortality can be identified by our approach. Such policies can be cost-efficient.
旨在减少空气污染物(如细颗粒物,PM)的政策通常在设计时并未明确针对健康效益,也未进行成本效益分析。
我们在城市区域层面开发了一种跨学科的前后向方法:从地方决策者设定的健康目标出发,我们估算出PM暴露和排放需要减少多少才能实现这些目标,并确定能带来这些减少的城市政策(后向方法)。最后,我们对这些政策进行了健康影响和成本效益分析(前向方法)。这些政策与所考虑区域(法国格勒诺布尔)排放最多的部门相关,即木材取暖和交通部门。前向方法还考虑了这些政策与身体活动和一氧化碳排放变化相关的健康影响和协同效益。
决策者设定了三个健康目标,与2016年相比,对应到2030年PM所致死亡率降低33%至67%。要实现PM所致死亡率降低67%,需要将PM暴露降低42%(从13.9微克/立方米降至)。对于专注于木材取暖的政策,每投资1欧元,总效益约为30欧元;对于交通政策,每投资1欧元,总效益为1至68欧元。仅对单个部门采取行动不足以实现PM所致死亡率降低67%。通过用低排放颗粒炉取代所有低效的木材取暖设备,并将私人机动车辆交通量减少36%,可以实现这一目标。这将需要增加主动出行方式(步行、骑自行车等)的比例,从而带来身体活动的增加以及超出初始目标的额外健康效益。对于有主动出行方式报告的政策,人均年度净效益在484欧元至629欧元之间,而没有主动出行方式报告的政策人均年度净效益在162欧元至270欧元之间。
我们的方法能够确定可大幅降低空气污染所致死亡率的城市政策。此类政策可能具有成本效益。