Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2021 Nov;2021:7629-7635. doi: 10.1109/EMBC46164.2021.9630676.
The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the world by interrupting most supply chains, including that of the medical supply industry. The threat imposed by export restriction measures and the limitation in the availability of mechanical ventilators posed a higher risk for smaller, developing countries, used to importing most of their technologies. To actively respond to the possible device shortage, the initiative "Ventilators for Panama" was established and was able to develop two different, non-competing, open-source hardware mechanical ventilator models for emergency use in case of shortages: one based on a bag-valve design and another based on positive airway pressure. The aim of this article is to compare both devices in terms of feasibility and functionality. Results from the functional testing show that both devices perform within specification, as the error percentage is lower than 5% for the desired pressure values and a standard deviation of less than 0.5 for all cases.Clinical Relevance- This study shows the feasibility of quickly deploying two different mechanical ventilator designs for emergency use and their effectiveness.
新冠疫情通过中断大多数供应链(包括医疗供应行业的供应链)扰乱了世界。出口限制措施和机械呼吸机供应的限制对习惯于进口大部分技术的较小的发展中国家构成了更高的风险。为了积极应对可能出现的设备短缺,启动了“为巴拿马提供呼吸机”计划,并成功开发了两种不同的、非竞争的开源硬件机械呼吸机模型,以便在短缺情况下紧急使用:一种基于袋阀设计,另一种基于正压通气。本文旨在比较这两种设备在可行性和功能方面的差异。功能测试结果表明,两种设备都符合规范,因为所需压力值的误差百分比均低于 5%,所有情况下的标准偏差均低于 0.5。临床相关性-本研究表明,快速部署两种不同的机械呼吸机紧急使用设计的可行性及其有效性。