Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Glueckstrasse 11, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Institute of Radiology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Maximiliansplatz 3, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2022 Mar;50(3):230-236. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2021.11.010. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
The aim of this study was to assess the inter- and intrarater reliability of a recently proposed scoring system for temporomandibular disorders (TMD), based upon radiological findings from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Patients with clinically suspected uni- or bilateral TMD, and subsequently conducted MRI examination of both temporomandibular joints, were included in this study. MRI data were independently evaluated by two experienced radiologists according to the DLJ scoring system proposed by Wurm et al., which includes assessment of the following categories: articular disk (prefix 'D'), direction of disk luxation (prefix 'L'), and osseous joint alterations (prefix 'J'). 60 patients (49 female and 11 male) were eligible for analysis. No significant differences were found between both observers regarding 'D' and 'L' scores (p = 0.13 and p = 0.59, respectively). Significant differences were found for the assessment of subtle osseous changes ('J0' category: p = 0.041; 'J1' category: p = 0.018). Almost perfect intra- and interrater agreements were found for 'D' and 'L' categories (intrarater and interrater agreements for 'D': κ = 0.92 and κ = 0.84, respectively; intrarater and interrater agreements for 'L': κ = 0.93 and κ = 0.89, respectively). However, the assessment of 'J' categories revealed only moderate interrater agreement (κ = 0.49). The DLJ scoring system based upon MRI findings is feasible for routine clinical TMD assessment, and may help to simplify interdisciplinary communication between radiologists and clinicians.
本研究旨在评估一种基于磁共振成像(MRI)放射学发现的新近提出的颞下颌关节紊乱(TMD)评分系统的组内和组间可靠性。本研究纳入了临床疑似单侧或双侧 TMD 并随后对双侧颞下颌关节进行 MRI 检查的患者。MRI 数据由两位有经验的放射科医生根据 Wurm 等人提出的 DLJ 评分系统进行独立评估,该系统包括以下类别的评估:关节盘(前缀“D”)、盘移位方向(前缀“L”)和骨关节改变(前缀“J”)。60 名患者(49 名女性和 11 名男性)符合分析条件。两位观察者在“D”和“L”评分方面无显著差异(p = 0.13 和 p = 0.59)。在评估细微的骨改变时存在显著差异(“J0”类别:p = 0.041;“J1”类别:p = 0.018)。“D”和“L”类别具有几乎完美的组内和组间一致性(“D”的组内和组间一致性:κ = 0.92 和 κ = 0.84;“L”的组内和组间一致性:κ = 0.93 和 κ = 0.89)。然而,“J”类别的评估仅显示中度的组间一致性(κ = 0.49)。基于 MRI 发现的 DLJ 评分系统可用于常规临床 TMD 评估,并可能有助于简化放射科医生和临床医生之间的跨学科交流。