• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影像学诊断颞下颌关节紊乱病:一种新型基于 MRI 的评分系统的可靠性。

Imaging temporomandibular disorders: Reliability of a novel MRI-based scoring system.

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Glueckstrasse 11, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.

Institute of Radiology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Maximiliansplatz 3, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.

出版信息

J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2022 Mar;50(3):230-236. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2021.11.010. Epub 2021 Nov 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcms.2021.11.010
PMID:34893389
Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the inter- and intrarater reliability of a recently proposed scoring system for temporomandibular disorders (TMD), based upon radiological findings from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Patients with clinically suspected uni- or bilateral TMD, and subsequently conducted MRI examination of both temporomandibular joints, were included in this study. MRI data were independently evaluated by two experienced radiologists according to the DLJ scoring system proposed by Wurm et al., which includes assessment of the following categories: articular disk (prefix 'D'), direction of disk luxation (prefix 'L'), and osseous joint alterations (prefix 'J'). 60 patients (49 female and 11 male) were eligible for analysis. No significant differences were found between both observers regarding 'D' and 'L' scores (p = 0.13 and p = 0.59, respectively). Significant differences were found for the assessment of subtle osseous changes ('J0' category: p = 0.041; 'J1' category: p = 0.018). Almost perfect intra- and interrater agreements were found for 'D' and 'L' categories (intrarater and interrater agreements for 'D': κ = 0.92 and κ = 0.84, respectively; intrarater and interrater agreements for 'L': κ = 0.93 and κ = 0.89, respectively). However, the assessment of 'J' categories revealed only moderate interrater agreement (κ = 0.49). The DLJ scoring system based upon MRI findings is feasible for routine clinical TMD assessment, and may help to simplify interdisciplinary communication between radiologists and clinicians.

摘要

本研究旨在评估一种基于磁共振成像(MRI)放射学发现的新近提出的颞下颌关节紊乱(TMD)评分系统的组内和组间可靠性。本研究纳入了临床疑似单侧或双侧 TMD 并随后对双侧颞下颌关节进行 MRI 检查的患者。MRI 数据由两位有经验的放射科医生根据 Wurm 等人提出的 DLJ 评分系统进行独立评估,该系统包括以下类别的评估:关节盘(前缀“D”)、盘移位方向(前缀“L”)和骨关节改变(前缀“J”)。60 名患者(49 名女性和 11 名男性)符合分析条件。两位观察者在“D”和“L”评分方面无显著差异(p = 0.13 和 p = 0.59)。在评估细微的骨改变时存在显著差异(“J0”类别:p = 0.041;“J1”类别:p = 0.018)。“D”和“L”类别具有几乎完美的组内和组间一致性(“D”的组内和组间一致性:κ = 0.92 和 κ = 0.84;“L”的组内和组间一致性:κ = 0.93 和 κ = 0.89)。然而,“J”类别的评估仅显示中度的组间一致性(κ = 0.49)。基于 MRI 发现的 DLJ 评分系统可用于常规临床 TMD 评估,并可能有助于简化放射科医生和临床医生之间的跨学科交流。

相似文献

1
Imaging temporomandibular disorders: Reliability of a novel MRI-based scoring system.影像学诊断颞下颌关节紊乱病:一种新型基于 MRI 的评分系统的可靠性。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2022 Mar;50(3):230-236. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2021.11.010. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
2
Diagnostic significance of magnetic resonance imaging in distinguishing temporomandibular disorders: a retrospective chart review.磁共振成像在鉴别颞下颌关节紊乱中的诊断意义:回顾性图表分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Sep 28;21(1):481. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01826-3.
3
Interrater and intrarater agreements of magnetic resonance imaging findings in the lumbar spine: significant variability across degenerative conditions.腰椎磁共振成像结果的评分者间和评分者内一致性:不同退变情况存在显著差异。
Spine J. 2014 Oct 1;14(10):2442-8. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.03.010. Epub 2014 Mar 15.
4
Correlation between pain and MRI findings in TMD patients.颞下颌关节紊乱病患者疼痛与 MRI 表现的相关性。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2018 Aug;46(8):1167-1171. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.12.029. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
5
The agreement between magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopic findings in temporomandibular joint disorders.磁共振成像与颞下颌关节紊乱症关节镜检查结果的一致性。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 May;50(5):657-664. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2020.10.012. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
6
Magnetic resonance imaging of the temporomandibular joint: interobserver agreement in subjective classification of disk status.颞下颌关节的磁共振成像:盘状结构主观分类中的观察者间一致性
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000 Jul;90(1):102-7. doi: 10.1067/moe.2000.106300.
7
Agreement between Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders and magnetic resonance diagnoses of temporomandibular disc displacement in a patient population.颞下颌关节紊乱病研究诊断标准与患者群体中颞下颌关节盘移位磁共振诊断之间的一致性。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Jul;37(7):612-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2008.04.003. Epub 2008 May 16.
8
[Experts consensus on MRI examination specification and diagnostic criteria of temporomandibular joint disc displacement].[颞下颌关节盘移位的MRI检查规范及诊断标准专家共识]
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2020 Sep 9;55(9):608-612. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20200514-00268.
9
[Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the TMJ: Influence on therapy and inter-observer agreement of two radiologists].[颞下颌关节的磁共振成像(MRI):对治疗的影响以及两位放射科医生之间的观察者间一致性]
Rofo. 2002 Nov;174(11):1415-21. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-35344.
10
Finite elements analysis of the temporomandibular joint disc in patients with intra-articular disorders.关节盘内紊乱患者颞下颌关节盘的有限元分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2020 Mar 30;20(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01074-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Novel Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approaches to Temporomandibular Dysfunction: A Narrative Review.颞下颌关节紊乱病的新型诊断与治疗方法:一项叙述性综述
Life (Basel). 2023 Aug 25;13(9):1808. doi: 10.3390/life13091808.
2
Intraobserver reliability and validity of a single ultrasonic measurement of the lateral condyle-capsule distance in the temporomandibular joint.颞下颌关节外侧髁-关节囊距离单次超声测量的观察者内可靠性和有效性。
J Ultrasound. 2024 Sep;27(3):479-485. doi: 10.1007/s40477-023-00818-z. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
3
MRI of Temporomandibular Joint Disorders: A Comparative Study of 0.55 T and 1.5 T MRI.
磁共振成像在颞下颌关节紊乱病中的应用:0.55T 与 1.5T 磁共振成像的对比研究。
Invest Radiol. 2024 Mar 1;59(3):223-229. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000001008.