• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颞下颌关节外侧髁-关节囊距离单次超声测量的观察者内可靠性和有效性。

Intraobserver reliability and validity of a single ultrasonic measurement of the lateral condyle-capsule distance in the temporomandibular joint.

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, Physical Therapy Department, University of Camilo José Cela, Madrid, Spain.

Departamento de Bioloxía Funcional e Ciencias da Saúde, Universidade de Vigo, 36005, Pontevedra, Spain.

出版信息

J Ultrasound. 2024 Sep;27(3):479-485. doi: 10.1007/s40477-023-00818-z. Epub 2023 Sep 1.

DOI:10.1007/s40477-023-00818-z
PMID:37653283
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11333410/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to examine the reliability and validity of a single lateral condyle-capsule distance (LCCD) measurement while saving on economic costs and clinical resources.

METHODS

A longitudinal test-retest design was used to assess the reliability and validity of single-examiner measures over 72 TMJ sonographic analyses. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and a Bland-Altman plot were used to study reliability and validity, comparing the first measurement of the LCCD to the mean of 3 measurements taken one week later by the same examiner.

RESULTS

ICC show intraobserver reliability of 0.981, 95% confidence intervals (CI) of 0.969 to 0.988. The mean difference between the ultrasound measurements is 0.019 mm (95% CI 0.0005-0.0383) with a standard deviation of 0.080 mm, demonstrating robust validity. The 95% Limits of Agreement (LoA) are - 0.138 for the lower limit and 0.177 for the upper. Mean relative error is 0.009 mm.

CONCLUSION

Intraobserver reliability of a trained examiner is very high in the single measurement of the LCCD and validity is significant compared to more complex methods. The risk of bias is low since the mean of three LCCD measurements is calculated as opposed to recording only one single measurement.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在检验单次外侧髁-关节囊距离(LCCD)测量的可靠性和有效性,同时节省经济成本和临床资源。

方法

采用纵向测试-再测试设计,对 72 例 TMJ 超声分析中单次检查的可靠性和有效性进行评估。使用组内相关系数(ICC)和 Bland-Altman 图来研究可靠性和有效性,将第一次 LCCD 测量与同一位检查者一周后进行的 3 次测量的平均值进行比较。

结果

ICC 显示观察者内可靠性为 0.981,95%置信区间(CI)为 0.969 至 0.988。超声测量的平均差值为 0.019 毫米(95%CI 为 0.0005-0.0383),标准差为 0.080 毫米,具有较强的有效性。95%的一致性界限(LoA)下限为-0.138,上限为 0.177。平均相对误差为 0.009 毫米。

结论

在单次 LCCD 测量中,经过培训的观察者的观察者内可靠性非常高,与更复杂的方法相比,有效性显著。由于计算了三个 LCCD 测量的平均值,而不是仅记录一个单一的测量,因此偏倚风险较低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa46/11333410/dd02fb394548/40477_2023_818_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa46/11333410/c11a035f3133/40477_2023_818_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa46/11333410/143d957849d4/40477_2023_818_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa46/11333410/dd02fb394548/40477_2023_818_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa46/11333410/c11a035f3133/40477_2023_818_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa46/11333410/143d957849d4/40477_2023_818_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa46/11333410/dd02fb394548/40477_2023_818_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Intraobserver reliability and validity of a single ultrasonic measurement of the lateral condyle-capsule distance in the temporomandibular joint.颞下颌关节外侧髁-关节囊距离单次超声测量的观察者内可靠性和有效性。
J Ultrasound. 2024 Sep;27(3):479-485. doi: 10.1007/s40477-023-00818-z. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
2
Sonography of the temporomandibular joint from 60 examinations and comparison with MRI and axiography.颞下颌关节的超声检查:60例检查结果及与MRI和X线体层摄影的比较
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2000 Dec;28(6):352-61. doi: 10.1054/jcms.2000.0176.
3
Ultrasonographic findings in normal temporomandibular joints.正常颞下颌关节的超声检查结果
Braz Oral Res. 2006 Jan-Mar;20(1):25-32. doi: 10.1590/s1806-83242006000100006. Epub 2006 May 22.
4
Deep Learning for Ultrasonographic Assessment of Temporomandibular Joint Morphology.深度学习用于颞下颌关节形态的超声评估
Tomography. 2025 Feb 27;11(3):27. doi: 10.3390/tomography11030027.
5
Ultrasonographic evaluation of disc displacement of the temporomandibular joint compared with magnetic resonance imaging.颞下颌关节盘移位的超声评估与磁共振成像的比较
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 May;68(5):1075-80. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.08.010. Epub 2010 Mar 1.
6
Regional 3D superimposition to assess temporomandibular joint condylar morphology.区域三维叠加评估颞下颌关节髁突形态。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2014;43(1):20130273. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20130273. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
7
Assessment of the reliability and validity of panoramic imaging for assessment of mandibular condyle morphology using both MRI and clinical examination as the gold standard.以MRI和临床检查作为金标准,评估全景成像在评估下颌髁突形态方面的可靠性和有效性。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006 Aug;102(2):220-4. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.07.039. Epub 2006 Jun 30.
8
Intra- and interobserver reliability of quantitative ultrasound measurement of the plantar fascia.足底筋膜定量超声测量的观察者内及观察者间可靠性
J Clin Ultrasound. 2011 Mar-Apr;39(3):128-34. doi: 10.1002/jcu.20787. Epub 2011 Jan 10.
9
Ultrasound and tomographic evaluation of temporomandibular joints in adolescents with and without signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders: a pilot study.有和无颞下颌关节紊乱体征及症状的青少年颞下颌关节的超声和断层扫描评估:一项初步研究
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2007 Oct;36(7):402-8. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/16641858.
10
Using Smart Bracelets to Assess Heart Rate Among Students During Physical Education Lessons: Feasibility, Reliability, and Validity Study.利用智能手环评估体育课中学生的心率:可行性、可靠性和有效性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Aug 5;8(8):e17699. doi: 10.2196/17699.

本文引用的文献

1
Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging for degenerative temporomandibular joint disease.磁共振成像对退行性颞下颌关节疾病的诊断性能。
J Oral Rehabil. 2023 Jan;50(1):24-30. doi: 10.1111/joor.13386. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
2
Imaging temporomandibular disorders: Reliability of a novel MRI-based scoring system.影像学诊断颞下颌关节紊乱病:一种新型基于 MRI 的评分系统的可靠性。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2022 Mar;50(3):230-236. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2021.11.010. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
3
Preoperative and postoperative assessment of temporal and masseter muscle size with magnetic resonance imaging in patients undergoing unilateral temporomandibular joint surgery.
磁共振成像评估单侧颞下颌关节手术患者颞肌和咬肌术前术后的大小。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2021 Aug;49(8):705-710. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2021.02.013. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
4
High-resolution ultrasound imaging compared to magnetic resonance imaging for temporomandibular joint disorders: An in vivo study.高分辨率超声成像与磁共振成像在颞下颌关节紊乱病中的比较:一项体内研究。
Eur J Radiol. 2020 Nov;132:109291. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109291. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
5
Imaging modalities for temporomandibular joint disorders: an update.颞下颌关节紊乱病的影像学检查方法:最新进展
Clujul Med. 2018 Jul;91(3):280-287. doi: 10.15386/cjmed-970. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
6
Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Temporomandibular Disorders: A Meta-Analysis.超声在颞下颌关节紊乱病诊断中的应用:一项荟萃分析。
Med Sci Monit. 2018 Feb 8;24:812-817. doi: 10.12659/msm.908810.
7
High-resolution ultrasonography in assessing temporomandibular joint disc position.高分辨率超声在评估颞下颌关节盘位置中的应用
Med Ultrason. 2018 Feb 4;1(1):64-70. doi: 10.11152/mu-1025.
8
STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration.《STARD 2015诊断准确性研究报告指南:解释与详述》
BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 14;6(11):e012799. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012799.
9
The Evolution of TMD Diagnosis: Past, Present, Future.颞下颌关节紊乱病诊断的演变:过去、现在与未来
J Dent Res. 2016 Sep;95(10):1093-101. doi: 10.1177/0022034516653922. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
10
Analysis of the morphometric characteristics of the cervical spine and its association with the development of temporomandibular disorders.颈椎形态计量学特征分析及其与颞下颌关节紊乱症发生发展的关系。
Cranio. 2017 Mar;35(2):79-85. doi: 10.1080/08869634.2016.1162950. Epub 2016 Apr 4.