College of Nursing, University of Colorado College of Nursing, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
College of Nursing, New York University Rory Meyers School of Nursing, New York, New York, USA.
Health Serv Res. 2022 Apr;57(2):351-363. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13922. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
To determine the prevalence of burnout among the midwifery workforce and the association between fixed personal and practice characteristics and modifiable organizational factors, specifically practice environment, to burnout among midwives in the United States.
Primary data collection was conducted via an online survey of the complete national roster of certified nurse-midwives and certified midwives over 3 weeks in April 2017.
The study was a cross-sectional observational survey consisting of 95 items about personal and practice characteristics, respondents' practice environments, and professional burnout.
The inclusion criterion was actively practicing midwifery in the United States. Data were analyzed with bivariate analyses to determine the association between personal and practice characteristics and burnout. A hierarchal multilinear regression evaluated the interrelationship between personal and practice characteristics, practice environment, and burnout.
Of the almost one third (30.9%) of certified nurse-midwives and certified midwives who responded to the survey, 40.6% met criteria for burnout. Weak negative correlations existed between burnout and indicators of career longevity: age (r(2256) = -0.09, p < 0.01), years as a midwife (r(2267) = -0.07, p = 0.01), and years with employer (r(2271) = -0.05, p = 0.02). There were significant relationships between burnout score and patient workload indicators: patients per day in outpatient setting (F(5,2292) = 13.995, p < 0.01), birth volume (F(3,1864) = 8.35, p < 0.01), and patient acuity (F(2,2295) = 20.21, p < 0.01). When the practice environment was entered into the model with personal and practice characteristics, the explained variance increased from 6.4% to 26.5% (F(20,1478) = 27.98, p < 0.01).
Our findings suggested that a key driver of burnout among US midwives was the practice environment, specifically practice leadership and participation and support for the midwifery model of care. Structural and personal characteristics contributed less to burnout score than the practice environment, implying that prevention of burnout may be achieved through organizational support and does not require structural changes to the provision of perinatal health.
确定美国助产士劳动力中倦怠的流行率,以及固定的个人和实践特征与可修改的组织因素(特别是实践环境)之间的关联,以确定美国助产士的倦怠情况。
通过 2017 年 4 月为期 3 周的在线调查,对注册护士助产士和注册助产士的完整国家名单进行了初步数据收集。
这是一项横断面观察性研究,包括 95 项关于个人和实践特征、受访者实践环境以及职业倦怠的问题。
纳入标准是在美国积极从事助产工作。通过单变量分析确定个人和实践特征与倦怠之间的关联。层次多元线性回归评估了个人和实践特征、实践环境和倦怠之间的相互关系。
在回应调查的近三分之一(30.9%)的注册护士助产士和注册助产士中,有 40.6%的人符合倦怠标准。倦怠与职业寿命的指标呈弱负相关:年龄(r(2256)=-0.09,p<0.01)、作为助产士的年限(r(2267)=-0.07,p=0.01)和与雇主的年限(r(2271)=-0.05,p=0.02)。倦怠评分与患者工作量指标之间存在显著关系:门诊环境中的患者人数(F(5,2292)=13.995,p<0.01)、分娩量(F(3,1864)=8.35,p<0.01)和患者严重程度(F(2,2295)=20.21,p<0.01)。当将实践环境与个人和实践特征一起纳入模型时,解释的方差从 6.4%增加到 26.5%(F(20,1478)=27.98,p<0.01)。
我们的研究结果表明,美国助产士倦怠的一个主要驱动因素是实践环境,特别是实践领导和对助产模式的参与和支持。结构和个人特征对倦怠评分的贡献小于实践环境,这意味着倦怠的预防可以通过组织支持来实现,而不需要对围产期保健的提供进行结构改革。