• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“高压力、尽责性与积极应对”:中国南方21家公立医院妇产科女护士及助产士人格特质、应对方式与压力负荷的相关性分析

"High-stress, conscientiousness and positive coping": correlation analysis of personality traits, coping style and stress load among obstetrics and gynecology female nurses and midwives in twenty-one public hospitals in Southern China.

作者信息

Ye Qiqi, Zhong Kefu, Yuan Li, Huang Qihua, Hu Xiangdan

机构信息

The Second Clinical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Dade Road 111, Guangzhou, China.

Guangdong Second Provincial Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

BMC Womens Health. 2025 Mar 14;25(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12905-025-03620-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12905-025-03620-7
PMID:40087707
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11907963/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The long-term occupational stress experienced by nurses and midwives in obstetrics and gynecology department not only impacts their mental well-being, but also poses a threat to nursing safety and sleep quality of nursing staff. Personality traits and stress coping strategies are believed to play a crucial and distinctive role in regulating stress. It is of great importance to discover effective methods for managing the occupational stress faced by nurses and midwives in obstetrics and gynecology. The study aims to identify the characteristic of stress load, personality and coping style among obstetrics and gynecology nurses and midwives, explore variations in stress levels based on their individual personality traits, and compare different levels of event load and individual vulnerability across various personality domains.

METHODS

A cross-section study was conducted from February 2023 to March 2023, and a stratified sampling method was used to select 424 obstetric and gynecological nurses. The survey was conducted using the General Information Questionnaire, the Chinese Big Five Personality Questionnaire, the Trait Coping Style Questionnaire, and the Chinese version of the Stress Overload Scale.

RESULTS

High stress of stress risk, conscientiousness and positive coping were the main characteristics of obstetrics and gynecology nurses and midwives. The stress-load was at a medium level, with an average score of (65.30 ± 17.27) points. There were statistically significant differences in stress-load among nurses with different marital status, hospital level, family occupational support and work motivation (p < 0.05). There was a significant positive correlation among neuroticism, negative coping, and event load. (p < 0.01). While conscientiousness, agreeableness, openness, extroversion and positive coping showed positive correlations (p < 0.05).

DISCUSSION

Based on our findings and the existing literature, we have so suggestions to relieve the stress-load of obstetrics and gynecology nurses and midwives: (1) improve social support and family support; (2) increase the application of intelligent technology appropriately; (3) improve midwifery models; (4) provide positive psychology training; (5) take advantage of the positive interaction between individual and situations.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING AND MIDWIFE POLICY

Nursing and midwife managers should strengthen care for nurses and midwives with significant neurotic personality, adopt flexible or magnetic management, improve midwifery models and elevate the dominant role of midwives in childbirth processes. Importantly, they should enhance group or individual psychological intervention to encourage a positive attitude towards stressors and foster the development of positive personalities.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73b7/11907963/3db252757db7/12905_2025_3620_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73b7/11907963/39f68355cae8/12905_2025_3620_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73b7/11907963/3db252757db7/12905_2025_3620_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73b7/11907963/39f68355cae8/12905_2025_3620_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73b7/11907963/3db252757db7/12905_2025_3620_Fig2_HTML.jpg
摘要

背景

妇产科护士和助产士长期经历的职业压力不仅会影响他们的心理健康,还会对护理安全和护理人员的睡眠质量构成威胁。人格特质和压力应对策略被认为在调节压力方面起着至关重要且独特的作用。探索有效方法来管理妇产科护士和助产士面临的职业压力非常重要。本研究旨在确定妇产科护士和助产士的压力负荷、人格和应对方式的特征,基于他们的个人人格特质探索压力水平的差异,并比较不同人格领域的事件负荷和个体易感性的不同水平。

方法

于2023年2月至2023年3月进行了一项横断面研究,采用分层抽样方法选取424名妇产科护士。使用一般信息问卷、中国大五人格问卷、特质应对方式问卷和中文版压力超负荷量表进行调查。

结果

压力风险高、尽责性和积极应对是妇产科护士和助产士的主要特征。压力负荷处于中等水平,平均得分为(65.30±17.27)分。不同婚姻状况、医院级别、家庭职业支持和工作动机的护士在压力负荷方面存在统计学显著差异(p<0.05)。神经质、消极应对和事件负荷之间存在显著正相关(p<0.01)。而尽责性、宜人性、开放性、外向性和积极应对呈正相关(p<0.05)。

讨论

基于我们的研究结果和现有文献,我们对减轻妇产科护士和助产士的压力负荷有以下建议:(1)改善社会支持和家庭支持;(2)适当增加智能技术的应用;(3)改进助产模式;(4)提供积极心理学培训;(5)利用个体与情境之间的积极互动。

结论及对护理和助产政策的启示

护理和助产管理人员应加强对具有显著神经质人格的护士和助产士的关怀,采用灵活或有吸引力的管理方式,改进助产模式,提升助产士在分娩过程中的主导作用。重要的是,他们应加强团体或个体心理干预,鼓励对压力源持积极态度,促进积极人格的发展。

相似文献

1
"High-stress, conscientiousness and positive coping": correlation analysis of personality traits, coping style and stress load among obstetrics and gynecology female nurses and midwives in twenty-one public hospitals in Southern China.“高压力、尽责性与积极应对”:中国南方21家公立医院妇产科女护士及助产士人格特质、应对方式与压力负荷的相关性分析
BMC Womens Health. 2025 Mar 14;25(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12905-025-03620-7.
2
Effect of Psychological Resilience on Posttraumatic Growth Among Midwives: The Mediating Roles of Perceived Stress and Positive Coping Strategies.心理弹性对助产士创伤后成长的影响:感知压力和积极应对策略的中介作用。
Nurs Open. 2024 Nov;11(11):e70076. doi: 10.1002/nop2.70076.
3
Nurses' and Midwives' Stress of Conscience and Its Correlation With Selected Sociodemographic and Work-Related Variables.护士和助产士的良心压力及其与选定的社会人口学和工作相关变量的相关性。
J Adv Nurs. 2025 May;81(5):2487-2499. doi: 10.1111/jan.16436. Epub 2024 Sep 5.
4
Knowledge, attitudes, and support needs of obstetric and gynecological nurses and midwives toward perinatal mental health disorders screening in Central China: a multicenter cross-sectional survey.华中地区妇产科护士和助产士对围产期心理健康障碍筛查的知识、态度和支持需求:一项多中心横断面调查。
Front Public Health. 2024 Oct 9;12:1424075. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1424075. eCollection 2024.
5
The mediating effect of coping styles between emergency capacity and mental workload among clinical nurses: A cross-sectional study.应对方式在临床护士应急能力与心理工作负荷间的中介效应:一项横断面研究。
Int Nurs Rev. 2024 Dec;71(4):1121-1129. doi: 10.1111/inr.12985. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
6
A mixed-methods stress audit with midwives in the United Kingdom.英国助产士混合方法压力审计。
Women Birth. 2024 Sep;37(5):101639. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2024.101639. Epub 2024 Jul 4.
7
The mediating effect of personality on mental workload and perceived professional benefits of nurses in East China.人格对中国东部地区护士心理负荷及感知职业获益的中介作用
BMC Nurs. 2023 Nov 22;22(1):440. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01603-3.
8
The five-factor model of personality, work stress and professional quality of life in neonatal intensive care unit nurses.人格的五因素模型、新生儿重症监护病房护士的工作压力与职业生活质量。
J Adv Nurs. 2018 Jun;74(6):1349-1358. doi: 10.1111/jan.13543. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
9
The impact of nurses' stress situation coping on somatization: a mediated moderation model.护士应激应对对躯体化的影响:一个有中介的调节模型。
PeerJ. 2024 Dec 6;12:e18658. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18658. eCollection 2024.
10
Psychological impact of COVID-19 outbreak on frontline nurses: A cross-sectional survey study.COVID-19 疫情对一线护士的心理影响:一项横断面调查研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Nov;29(21-22):4217-4226. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15454. Epub 2020 Aug 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Senior midwives' perspectives on the transition experience of newly graduated undergraduate midwives in China: a qualitative study.中国资深助产士对本科应届毕业助产士过渡经历的看法:一项定性研究
BMC Med Educ. 2025 May 12;25(1):692. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07285-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Midwives' stress and burnout during the Omicron wave in Italy: An observational survey.意大利奥密克戎疫情期间助产士的压力和倦怠:一项观察性调查。
J Adv Nurs. 2024 Nov;80(11):4510-4522. doi: 10.1111/jan.16065. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
2
Stress overload, influencing factors, and psychological experiences of nurse managers during early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: a sequential explanatory mixed method study.新冠疫情早期阶段护理管理者的压力过载、影响因素及心理体验:一项序列解释性混合方法研究
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 30;14:1187433. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1187433. eCollection 2023.
3
A mixed-method study exploring barriers and facilitators to midwives' mental health in Ontario.
安大略省助产士心理健康障碍与促进因素的混合方法研究
BMC Womens Health. 2023 Apr 1;23(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02309-z.
4
Analysis of Factors Related to Mental Health, Suppression of Emotions, and Personality Influencing Coping with Stress among Nurses.分析护士心理健康、情绪压抑和人格因素对压力应对的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 9;19(16):9777. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19169777.
5
Positive Psychology in Poland Between 2001 and 2020: A Review of Available Articles.2001年至2020年间波兰的积极心理学:现有文章综述
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 15;12:659337. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.659337. eCollection 2021.
6
Burnout of the US midwifery workforce and the role of practice environment.美国助产士劳动力倦怠及其执业环境的作用。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Apr;57(2):351-363. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13922. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
7
Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders Among Hospital Midwives in Chenzhou, Hunan Province, China and Associations with Job Stress and Working Conditions.中国湖南省郴州市医院助产士工作相关肌肉骨骼疾病及其与工作压力和工作条件的关联
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Sep 3;14:3675-3686. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S299113. eCollection 2021.
8
Work-Related Stress and Anxiety Among Frontline Nurses During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study.COVID-19 大流行期间一线护士的工作相关压力和焦虑:一项横断面研究。
J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2021 Aug;59(8):31-42. doi: 10.3928/02793695-20210322-02. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
9
Relationships Among Character Strengths, Self-efficacy, Social Support, Depression, and Psychological Well-being of Hospital Nurses.护士的性格优势、自我效能、社会支持、抑郁与心理健康的关系。
Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2020 Aug;14(3):150-157. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2020.06.002. Epub 2020 Jul 5.
10
The status of nursing and midwifery in the world.全球护理与助产的现状。
Lancet. 2020 Apr 11;395(10231):1167. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30821-7. Epub 2020 Apr 8.