• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医患沟通中的共情验证:一种针对解决方案不确定问题表达共情的方法。

Empathic Validation in Physician-Patient Communication: An Approach to Conveying Empathy for Problems With Uncertain Solutions.

作者信息

Tietbohl Caroline K

机构信息

Adult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS), Children's Hospital Colorado, 129263University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.

出版信息

Qual Health Res. 2022 Feb;32(3):413-425. doi: 10.1177/10497323211056312. Epub 2021 Dec 11.

DOI:10.1177/10497323211056312
PMID:34894864
Abstract

Interest in systematic approaches to improving clinical empathy has increased. However, conceptualizations of empathy are inconsistent and difficult to operationalize. Drawing on video recordings of primary care visits with older adults, I describe one particular communication strategy for conveying empathy-empathic validation. Using conversation analysis, I show that the design of empathic validations and the context in which they are delivered are critical to positive patient responses. Effective empathic validations must (a) demonstrate shared understanding and (b) support the patient's position. Physicians provided empathic validation when there was no medical solution to offer and within this context, for three purposes: (1) normalizing changes in health, (2) acknowledging individual difficulty, and (3) recognizing actions or choices. Empathic validation is a useful approach because it does not rely on patients' ability to create an "empathic opportunity" and has particular relevance for older adults.

摘要

人们对改善临床同理心的系统方法的兴趣有所增加。然而,同理心的概念并不一致,且难以实施。基于对老年人初级保健就诊的视频记录,我描述了一种传达同理心的特定沟通策略——同理心验证。通过会话分析,我表明同理心验证的设计及其传达的背景对于患者的积极反应至关重要。有效的同理心验证必须(a)表现出共同理解,(b)支持患者的立场。当没有医疗解决方案可提供时,医生会进行同理心验证,在此背景下,有三个目的:(1)使健康变化正常化,(2)承认个人困难,(3)认可行动或选择。同理心验证是一种有用的方法,因为它不依赖患者创造“同理心机会”的能力,并且对老年人尤为重要。

相似文献

1
Empathic Validation in Physician-Patient Communication: An Approach to Conveying Empathy for Problems With Uncertain Solutions.医患沟通中的共情验证:一种针对解决方案不确定问题表达共情的方法。
Qual Health Res. 2022 Feb;32(3):413-425. doi: 10.1177/10497323211056312. Epub 2021 Dec 11.
2
Examining empathy in medical encounters: an observational study using the empathic communication coding system.审视医疗互动中的同理心:一项使用同理心沟通编码系统的观察性研究。
Health Commun. 2005;18(2):123-40. doi: 10.1207/s15327027hc1802_2.
3
Empathic communication and gender in the physician-patient encounter.医患互动中的共情沟通与性别
Patient Educ Couns. 2002 Dec;48(3):207-16. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(02)00173-8.
4
Missed opportunities for interval empathy in lung cancer communication.肺癌沟通中错失的共情时机。
Arch Intern Med. 2008 Sep 22;168(17):1853-8. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.17.1853.
5
Competent patient care is dependent upon attending to empathic opportunities presented during interview sessions.提供充分的患者护理取决于把握问诊过程中出现的共情机会。
Curr Surg. 2004 May-Jun;61(3):313-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cursur.2003.12.006.
6
Lay Perspectives on Empathy in Patient-Physician Communication: An Online Experimental Study.患者-医生沟通中同理心的公众观点:一项在线实验研究。
Health Commun. 2024 May;39(6):1246-1255. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2023.2210380. Epub 2023 May 23.
7
Structured Analysis of Empathic Opportunities and Physician Responses during Lung Cancer Patient-Physician Consultations.在肺癌医患沟通中分析共情机会和医生反应的结构。
J Health Commun. 2019;24(9):711-718. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2019.1665757. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
8
Is Physician Empathy Associated With Differences in Pain and Functional Limitations After a Hand Surgeon Visit?医生共情与手外科就诊后疼痛和功能受限的差异有关吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Apr;476(4):801-807. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000077.
9
Three types of ambiguity in coding empathic interactions in primary care visits: implications for research and practice.初级保健就诊中编码共情互动的三种类型的模糊性:对研究和实践的影响。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Oct;89(1):63-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.06.013. Epub 2012 Jul 17.
10
Observing physicians acting with different levels of empathy modulates later assessed pain tolerance.观察医生表现出不同程度的同理心会调节之后评估的疼痛耐受力。
Br J Health Psychol. 2022 May;27(2):434-448. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12553. Epub 2021 Aug 10.

引用本文的文献

1
I Want to be Known as a Whole Human Being: A Qualitative Study About Patients' Experiences of Empathy in Health Care.我希望被视为一个完整的人:一项关于患者在医疗保健中同理心体验的定性研究。
J Patient Exp. 2025 Aug 21;12:23743735251369702. doi: 10.1177/23743735251369702. eCollection 2025.
2
Validating nonverbal cues for assessing physician empathy in telemedicine: a Delphi study.验证用于评估远程医疗中医生同理心的非语言线索:一项德尔菲研究。
Med Educ Online. 2025 Dec;30(1):2497328. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2025.2497328. Epub 2025 May 8.
3
Incorporating verbal and nonverbal aspects to enhance a model of patient communication in cancer care: A grounded theory study.
将言语和非言语方面纳入其中,以增强癌症护理中患者沟通模型:扎根理论研究。
Cancer Med. 2024 Jul;13(14):e70010. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70010.