• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NIHR)关于新冠大流行及之后远程临床试验交付的英国工作组报告。

A report from the NIHR UK working group on remote trial delivery for the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.

机构信息

Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK.

College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

出版信息

Trials. 2021 Dec 11;22(1):911. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05880-8.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-021-05880-8
PMID:34895305
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8665850/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, the majority of clinical trial activity took place face to face within clinical or research units. The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a significant shift towards trial delivery without in-person face-to-face contact or "Remote Trial Delivery". The National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) assembled a Remote Trial Delivery Working Group to consider challenges and enablers to this major change in clinical trial delivery and to provide a toolkit for researchers to support the transition to remote delivery.

METHODS

The NIHR Remote Trial Delivery Working Group evaluated five key domains of the trial delivery pathway: participant factors, recruitment, intervention delivery, outcome measurement and quality assurance. Independent surveys were disseminated to research professionals, and patients and carers, to ascertain benefits, challenges, pitfalls, enablers and examples of good practice in Remote Trial Delivery. A toolkit was constructed to support researchers, funders and governance structures in moving towards Remote Trial Delivery. The toolkit comprises a website encompassing the key principles of Remote Trial Delivery, and a repository of best practice examples and questions to guide research teams.

RESULTS

The patient and carer survey received 47 respondents, 34 of whom were patients and 13 of whom were carers. The professional survey had 115 examples of remote trial delivery practice entered from across England. Key potential benefits included broader reach and inclusivity, the ability for standardisation and centralisation, and increased efficiency and patient/carer convenience. Challenges included the potential exclusion of participants lacking connectivity or digital skills, the lack of digitally skilled workforce and appropriate infrastructure, and validation requirements. Five key principles of Remote Trial Delivery were proposed: national research standards, inclusivity, validity, cost-effectiveness and evaluation of new methodologies.

CONCLUSIONS

The rapid changes towards Remote Trial Delivery catalysed by the COVID-19 pandemic could lead to sustained change in clinical trial delivery. The NIHR Remote Trial Delivery Working Group provide a toolkit for researchers recommending five key principles of Remote Trial Delivery and providing examples of enablers.

摘要

背景

在 COVID-19 大流行之前,大多数临床试验活动都是在临床或研究单位面对面进行的。COVID-19 大流行导致临床试验的交付方式发生了重大转变,不再需要面对面的接触,即“远程临床试验交付”。英国国家卫生研究院(NIHR)成立了一个远程临床试验交付工作组,以研究临床试验交付方式发生这一重大转变所面临的挑战和推动因素,并为研究人员提供一个工具包,以支持向远程交付的过渡。

方法

NIHR 远程临床试验交付工作组评估了临床试验交付途径的五个关键领域:参与者因素、招募、干预措施交付、结果测量和质量保证。向研究专业人员以及患者和护理人员分发了独立的调查,以确定远程临床试验交付中的获益、挑战、陷阱、推动因素和良好实践的例子。构建了一个工具包,以支持研究人员、资助者和治理结构向远程临床试验交付转变。该工具包包括一个网站,涵盖了远程临床试验交付的关键原则,以及一个最佳实践例子和问题的存储库,以指导研究团队。

结果

患者和护理人员的调查收到了 47 名受访者的回复,其中 34 名是患者,13 名是护理人员。专业人员的调查收到了来自英格兰各地的 115 个远程临床试验实践的例子。主要潜在获益包括更广泛的覆盖范围和包容性、标准化和集中化的能力、提高效率和患者/护理人员的便利性。挑战包括可能排除缺乏联网或数字技能的参与者、缺乏数字技能劳动力和适当的基础设施、以及验证要求。提出了远程临床试验交付的五项关键原则:国家研究标准、包容性、有效性、成本效益和新方法的评估。

结论

COVID-19 大流行催生出的向远程临床试验交付的快速转变可能会导致临床试验交付方式的持续改变。NIHR 远程临床试验交付工作组为研究人员提供了一个工具包,建议了远程临床试验交付的五项关键原则,并提供了推动因素的例子。

相似文献

1
A report from the NIHR UK working group on remote trial delivery for the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NIHR)关于新冠大流行及之后远程临床试验交付的英国工作组报告。
Trials. 2021 Dec 11;22(1):911. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05880-8.
2
Remote Consultations Versus Standard Face-to-Face Appointments for Liver Transplant Patients in Routine Hospital Care: Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial of myVideoClinic.远程会诊与常规医院护理中肝移植患者标准面对面预约的比较:myVideoClinic 的可行性随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 17;23(9):e19232. doi: 10.2196/19232.
3
Carer administration of as-needed subcutaneous medication for breakthrough symptoms in people dying at home: the CARiAD feasibility RCT.居家临终患者按需皮下注射治疗突破性症状的照护者管理:CARiAD 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 May;24(25):1-150. doi: 10.3310/hta24250.
4
Challenges and adaptations to public involvement with marginalised groups during the COVID-19 pandemic: commentary with illustrative case studies in the context of patient safety research.新冠疫情期间公共参与与边缘化群体面临的挑战及适应策略:结合患者安全研究中的实例进行评论
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Apr 11;8(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00345-x.
5
It is unprecedented: trial management during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.这是前所未有的:COVID-19 大流行期间及之后的临床试验管理。
Trials. 2020 Sep 11;21(1):784. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04711-6.
6
How has COVID-19 affected mental health nurses and the delivery of mental health nursing care in the UK? Results of a mixed-methods study.新冠疫情如何影响了英国的心理健康护士和心理健康护理服务的提供?一项混合方法研究的结果。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2021 Apr;28(2):126-137. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12745. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
7
Using Twitter Comments to Understand People's Experiences of UK Health Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Thematic and Sentiment Analysis.利用推特评论了解新冠疫情期间英国人对英国医疗保健的体验:主题和情感分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 25;23(10):e31101. doi: 10.2196/31101.
8
The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on working practices of UK primary care optometrists.新冠疫情对英国初级保健视光师工作实践的影响。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2021 Mar;41(2):378-392. doi: 10.1111/opo.12786. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
9
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
10
A web-based, peer-supported self-management intervention to reduce distress in relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar disorder: the REACT RCT.一项基于网络的、由同行支持的自我管理干预措施,旨在减轻精神病或双相情感障碍患者亲属的痛苦:REACT RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jun;24(32):1-142. doi: 10.3310/hta24320.

引用本文的文献

1
PEARLES challenges and solutions to the implementation of clinical research responses to epidemics and pandemics: a scoping review.PEARLES:应对流行病和大流行的临床研究实施中的挑战与解决方案:一项范围综述
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Jun 27;85:103294. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103294. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
The role of intersectionality in shaping participant engagement with health research through digital methods: findings from a qualitative study.交叉性在通过数字方法塑造参与者对健康研究的参与度方面的作用:一项定性研究的结果
Trials. 2025 Jun 21;26(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08929-0.
3
Comparing Venous vs. Capillary Blood Collection Methods for Proteomic Measurement in Peripheral Blood.

本文引用的文献

1
Online Patient Recruitment in Clinical Trials: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.在线临床试验患者招募:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 4;22(11):e22179. doi: 10.2196/22179.
2
Developing a roadmap to improve trial delivery for under-served groups: results from a UK multi-stakeholder process.制定改善服务不足群体试验交付的路线图:来自英国多方利益相关者进程的结果。
Trials. 2020 Aug 1;21(1):694. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04613-7.
3
Verification, analytical validation, and clinical validation (V3): the foundation of determining fit-for-purpose for Biometric Monitoring Technologies (BioMeTs).
比较外周血蛋白质组学检测中静脉血与毛细血管血采集方法
Proteomics Clin Appl. 2025 Jul;19(4):e70007. doi: 10.1002/prca.70007. Epub 2025 Apr 18.
4
Participant perspectives about decentralised trial procedures in a remote delivery nutrition intervention trial.参与者对远程实施营养干预试验中去中心化试验程序的看法。
J Nutr Sci. 2025 Feb 20;14:e13. doi: 10.1017/jns.2025.10. eCollection 2025.
5
Randomised controlled decentralised feasibility trial of a fixed low-dose combination antihypertensive drug strategy to attenuate cognitive decline in high-risk adults.一项固定低剂量复方降压药物策略以减缓高危成年人认知能力下降的随机对照分散可行性试验。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 24;14(8):e080862. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080862.
6
Research protocol and recruitment redesign of a study of pregnant women and their infants during the COVID-19 pandemic: Childhood Allergy and the NeOnatal Environment (CANOE).2019年冠状病毒病大流行期间一项针对孕妇及其婴儿的研究的研究方案与招募工作重新设计:儿童过敏与新生儿环境(CANOE)研究
J Allergy Clin Immunol Glob. 2024 May 1;3(3):100270. doi: 10.1016/j.jacig.2024.100270. eCollection 2024 Aug.
7
A global pilot comparative, cross-sectional study of clinical research nurses/research midwives: Definition, knowledge base, and communication skills related to the conduct of decentralized clinical trials.一项关于临床研究护士/助产士研究者的全球试点比较横断面研究:与开展去中心化临床试验相关的定义、知识基础和沟通技巧。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 May 6;8(1):e90. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.535. eCollection 2024.
8
Can learnings from the COVID-19 pandemic improve trial conduct post-pandemic? A case study of strategies used by the DISC trial.从新冠疫情中获得的经验教训能否改善疫情后的试验开展情况?以DISC试验所采用的策略为例进行研究。
Res Methods Med Health Sci. 2023 Mar;4(2):50-60. doi: 10.1177/26320843221128296. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
9
Adapting, restarting, and terminating a randomised control trial for people with cystic fibrosis: Reflections on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic upon research in a clinical population.针对囊性纤维化患者调整、重启和终止一项随机对照试验:关于新冠疫情对临床人群研究影响的思考
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2024 Mar 27;39:101294. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101294. eCollection 2024 Jun.
10
Using digital tools in clinical, health and social care research: a mixed-methods study of UK stakeholders.利用数字工具进行临床、健康和社会保健研究:英国利益攸关方的混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 3;14(4):e076613. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076613.
验证、分析验证和临床验证(V3):确定生物识别监测技术(BioMeTs)适用性的基础。
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Apr 14;3:55. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-0260-4. eCollection 2020.
4
Metadata Concepts for Advancing the Use of Digital Health Technologies in Clinical Research.推进数字健康技术在临床研究中应用的元数据概念
Digit Biomark. 2019 Oct 7;3(3):116-132. doi: 10.1159/000502951. eCollection 2019 Sep-Dec.
5
Factors affecting patient participation in clinical trials in Ireland: A narrative review.影响爱尔兰患者参与临床试验的因素:一项叙述性综述。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2016 Mar 2;3:23-31. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2016.01.002. eCollection 2016 Aug 15.
6
Recruitment and participation in clinical trials: socio-demographic, rural/urban, and health care access predictors.临床试验的招募与参与:社会人口统计学、城乡及医疗保健可及性预测因素
Cancer Detect Prev. 2006;30(1):24-33. doi: 10.1016/j.cdp.2005.12.001. Epub 2006 Feb 21.