• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从农场到餐桌战略和化学投入物使用限制:对意大利各种类型农业和地区的影响。

Farm to Fork strategy and restrictions on the use of chemical inputs: Impacts on the various types of farming and territories of Italy.

机构信息

University of Tuscia, Department of Agriculture and Forest Sciences (DAFNE), Italy.

University of Tuscia, Department of Agriculture and Forest Sciences (DAFNE), Italy.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2022 Mar 1;810:152259. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152259. Epub 2021 Dec 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152259
PMID:34896512
Abstract

This study evaluates the impacts of reduction in chemical inputs use, as defined to the Farm to Fork strategy, on the Italian agricultural sector based on current production practices and technologies, as well as market and political framework. The impacts are evaluated in terms of some economic, environmental and social indicators, and are shown and discussed both geographic area and types of farming. The analysis was conducted on all Farm Accountancy Data Network (FADN) sample of Italian farms in various years, about 40,000 farms, by using the AGRITALIM model. The main results show an improvement in environmental sustainability of agricultural production in terms of lower use of chemical. Negative socio-economic and productive impacts are observed overall in the national territory, but some areas are more affected. The reduction of income could especially affect some types of farming and smaller farms. In conclusion, the Farm to Fork strategy could be a fundamental impetus to review some failings and weaknesses of European agriculture. Our analysis shows that targeted and forward-looking interventions are especially important for some types of farming, production sectors and territories. New research is needed to support the choices of stakeholders regarding policy support and innovation in agriculture. Political interventions are needed to incentivize farmers to adopt environmentally friendly agricultural practices and limit income losses. Genetic and technological innovations could play a fundamental role in limiting the reductions of agricultural production and modernizing farms.

摘要

本研究评估了根据当前生产实践和技术以及市场和政治框架,减少《从农场到餐桌》战略中定义的化学投入对意大利农业部门的影响。评估了一些经济、环境和社会指标的影响,并在地理区域和农业类型方面进行了展示和讨论。该分析使用 AGRITALIM 模型对意大利各年份的所有农业账户数据网络(FADN)样本农场进行了分析,约 40000 个农场。主要结果表明,在降低化学物质使用方面,农业生产的环境可持续性得到了提高。在全国范围内,观察到负的社会经济和生产影响,但有些地区受影响更大。收入的减少可能会特别影响某些类型的农业和较小的农场。总之,《从农场到餐桌》战略可能是审查欧洲农业一些缺陷和弱点的重要推动力。我们的分析表明,有针对性和前瞻性的干预措施对于某些类型的农业、生产部门和地区尤为重要。需要进行新的研究,以支持利益相关者在农业政策支持和创新方面的选择。需要进行政治干预,以激励农民采用环保农业实践并限制收入损失。遗传和技术创新可以在限制农业生产减少和现代化农场方面发挥重要作用。

相似文献

1
Farm to Fork strategy and restrictions on the use of chemical inputs: Impacts on the various types of farming and territories of Italy.从农场到餐桌战略和化学投入物使用限制:对意大利各种类型农业和地区的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Mar 1;810:152259. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152259. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
2
Is agritourism eco-friendly? A comparison between agritourisms and other farms in Italy using farm accountancy data network dataset.农业旅游是否生态友好?利用农场会计数据网络数据集对意大利的农业旅游与其他农场进行比较。
Springerplus. 2015 Oct 12;4:590. doi: 10.1186/s40064-015-1353-4. eCollection 2015.
3
Greening and legume-supported crop rotations: An impacts assessment on Italian arable farms.绿化和豆科作物轮作:对意大利耕地农场的影响评估。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Sep 10;734:139464. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139464. Epub 2020 May 16.
4
Adoption of Precision Farming Tools: The Case of Italian Farmers.精准农业工具的采用:以意大利农民为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 30;17(3):869. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17030869.
5
Mixed crop-livestock systems: an economic and environmental-friendly way of farming?种养结合系统:一种经济环保的农业方式?
Animal. 2012 Oct;6(10):1722-30. doi: 10.1017/S1751731112000675. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
6
Impact of direct payments and non-financial support on smallholder income from environmentally friendly agriculture in Tohoku region, Japan.日本东北地区环保型农业对小农户收入的直接支付和非金融支持的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Feb;351:119698. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119698. Epub 2023 Dec 1.
7
The link between production efficiency and opportunity cost of protecting environment in TR83 region, Turkey.土耳其 TR83 地区的生产效率与环境保护机会成本之间的联系。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Oct;27(28):35112-35125. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09726-9. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
8
Sustainability assessment of different land tenure farming systems in tea farming: The effect of decisional and structural variables.不同土地权属种植制度在茶园中的可持续性评估:决策和结构变量的影响。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2021 Jul;17(4):814-834. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4379. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
9
CAP's environmental policy and land use in arable farms: An impacts assessment of greening practices changes in Italy.《意大利农业耕地的 CAP 环境政策和土地利用:绿化实践变化的影响评估》。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Jan 10;647:516-524. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.443. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
10
Characterizing beef and sheep farming systems to customize sustainability interventions and policy implementation.描述牛肉和羊肉养殖系统,以定制可持续性干预措施和政策实施。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Aug;366:121900. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121900. Epub 2024 Jul 16.