Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, FI-33014 Tampere University, Tampere, Finland; Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, School of Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.
Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, School of Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland; Advanced Magnetic Imaging (AMI) Centre, Aalto NeuroImaging, School of Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland; Turku PET Centre and Department of Psychology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland; Department of Computer Science, School of Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland; International Laboratory of Social Neurobiology, Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience, HSE University, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Neuroimage. 2022 Feb 15;247:118800. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118800. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
Neurophysiological and psychological models posit that emotions depend on connections across wide-spread corticolimbic circuits. While previous studies using pattern recognition on neuroimaging data have shown differences between various discrete emotions in brain activity patterns, less is known about the differences in functional connectivity. Thus, we employed multivariate pattern analysis on functional magnetic resonance imaging data (i) to develop a pipeline for applying pattern recognition in functional connectivity data, and (ii) to test whether connectivity patterns differ across emotion categories. Six emotions (anger, fear, disgust, happiness, sadness, and surprise) and a neutral state were induced in 16 participants using one-minute-long emotional narratives with natural prosody while brain activity was measured with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). We computed emotion-wise connectivity matrices both for whole-brain connections and for 10 previously defined functionally connected brain subnetworks and trained an across-participant classifier to categorize the emotional states based on whole-brain data and for each subnetwork separately. The whole-brain classifier performed above chance level with all emotions except sadness, suggesting that different emotions are characterized by differences in large-scale connectivity patterns. When focusing on the connectivity within the 10 subnetworks, classification was successful within the default mode system and for all emotions. We thus show preliminary evidence for consistently different sustained functional connectivity patterns for instances of emotion categories particularly within the default mode system.
神经生理学和心理学模型假设情绪取决于广泛的皮质边缘回路之间的连接。虽然以前使用神经影像学数据的模式识别研究已经表明大脑活动模式中各种不同情绪之间存在差异,但对于功能连接的差异知之甚少。因此,我们在功能磁共振成像数据上使用多元模式分析 (i) 开发一种应用功能连接数据中的模式识别的管道,以及 (ii) 测试连接模式是否在情绪类别之间存在差异。使用具有自然韵律的一分钟长情感叙事在 16 名参与者中诱发六种情绪(愤怒、恐惧、厌恶、快乐、悲伤和惊讶)和中性状态,同时使用功能磁共振成像 (fMRI) 测量大脑活动。我们计算了整个大脑连接的情绪连接矩阵,以及 10 个先前定义的功能连接的大脑子网,并训练了一个跨参与者分类器,以便根据全脑数据和每个子网分别对情绪状态进行分类。全脑分类器在所有情绪(除悲伤外)上的表现均高于机会水平,表明不同的情绪特征在于大尺度连接模式的差异。当关注 10 个子网内的连接时,在默认模式系统和所有情绪中都可以成功分类。因此,我们初步证明了情绪类别实例的持续功能连接模式存在一致性差异,特别是在默认模式系统中。