Suppr超能文献

高剂量与低剂量地塞米松治疗 COVID-19 相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征:一项多中心、随机、开放标签临床试验。

High- Versus Low-Dose Dexamethasone for the Treatment of COVID-19-Related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Multicenter, Randomized Open-Label Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario Sede Pombo (Instituto Universitario CEMIC, Centro de Educación Médica e Investigaciones Clínicas), Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Pulmonary Section, 62883CEMIC, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

出版信息

J Intensive Care Med. 2022 Apr;37(4):491-499. doi: 10.1177/08850666211066799. Epub 2021 Dec 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether high-dose dexamethasone increases the number of ventilator-free days (VFD) among patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) caused by COVID-19.

DESIGN

Multicenter, randomized, open-label, clinical trial.

PARTICIPANTS

Consecutive patients with confirmed COVID-19-related ARDS were enrolled from June 17, 2020, to March 27, 2021, in four intensive care units (ICUs) in Argentina.

INTERVENTION

16 mg of dexamethasone intravenously daily for five days followed by 8 mg of dexamethasone daily for five days or 6 mg of dexamethasone intravenously daily for 10 days.

MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was ventilator-free days during the first 28 days. The secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality at 28 and 90 days, infection rate, muscle weakness, and glycemic control in the first 28 days.

RESULTS

Data from 98 patients who received at least one dose of dexamethasone were analyzed. The trial was prematurely terminated due to low enrollment rate. At 28 days after randomization, there was no difference between high- and low-dose dexamethasone groups in VFD (median, 0 [interquartile range [IQR] 0-14] vs. 0 [IQR 0-1] days;  = .231), or in the mean duration of mechanical ventilation (19 ± 18 vs. 25 ± 22 days;  = .078). The cumulative hazard of successful discontinuation from mechanical ventilation was increased by the high-dose treatment (adjusted sub-distribution hazard ratio: 1.84; 95% CI: 1.31 to 2.5;  < .001). None of the prespecified secondary and safety outcomes showed a significant difference between treatment arms.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with ARDS due to COVID-19, the use of higher doses of dexamethasone compared with the recommended low-dose treatment did not show an increase in VFD. However, the higher dose significantly improved the time required to liberate them from the ventilator.

摘要

目的

确定高剂量地塞米松是否会增加 COVID-19 引起的急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者的无呼吸机天数(VFD)。

设计

多中心、随机、开放标签、临床试验。

参与者

2020 年 6 月 17 日至 2021 年 3 月 27 日,连续纳入阿根廷 4 个重症监护病房(ICU)的确诊 COVID-19 相关 ARDS 患者。

干预措施

静脉注射地塞米松 16mg,每日 1 次,连用 5 天,然后每日 8mg,连用 5 天,或静脉注射地塞米松 6mg,每日 1 次,连用 10 天。

主要结果和测量指标

主要结局为 28 天内无呼吸机天数。次要结局为 28 天和 90 天的全因死亡率、感染率、肌肉无力和 28 天内的血糖控制。

结果

分析了 98 例至少接受 1 剂地塞米松治疗的患者的数据。由于入组率低,试验提前终止。随机分组后 28 天,高、低剂量地塞米松组 VFD 差异无统计学意义(中位数,0[四分位距[IQR]0-14]vs.0[IQR0-1]天;=0.231),机械通气时间的平均差异也无统计学意义(19±18 vs.25±22 天;=0.078)。高剂量治疗增加了机械通气成功停用的累积风险(调整后的亚分布风险比:1.84;95%CI:1.31 至 2.5;<0.001)。治疗组之间的所有预设次要和安全性结局均无显著差异。

结论

在 COVID-19 引起的 ARDS 患者中,与推荐的低剂量治疗相比,使用更高剂量的地塞米松并未增加 VFD。然而,高剂量确实显著缩短了从呼吸机中解脱的时间。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

9
Glucocorticoid therapy for acute respiratory distress syndrome: Current concepts.急性呼吸窘迫综合征的糖皮质激素治疗:当前概念
J Intensive Med. 2024 Apr 1;4(4):417-432. doi: 10.1016/j.jointm.2024.02.002. eCollection 2024 Oct.

本文引用的文献

2
Dexamethasone vs methylprednisolone high dose for Covid-19 pneumonia.地塞米松与甲泼尼龙大剂量治疗新冠肺炎肺炎。
PLoS One. 2021 May 25;16(5):e0252057. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252057. eCollection 2021.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验