Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences (FMCB), Campus de Gambelas, University of Algarve, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal.
Algarve Biomedical Center Research Institute (ABC-RI), 8005-139 Faro, Portugal.
Curr Oncol. 2021 Nov 20;28(6):4874-4893. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28060411.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) has an important bearing (top five) on cancer incidence and mortality in the world. The etiology of sporadic CRC is related to the accumulation of genetic and epigenetic alterations that result in the appearance of cancer hallmarks such as abnormal proliferation, evasion of immune destruction, resistance to apoptosis, replicative immortality, and others, contributing to cancer promotion, invasion, and metastasis. It is estimated that, each year, at least four million people are diagnosed with CRC in the world. Depending on CRC staging at diagnosis, many of these patients die, as CRC is in the top four causes of cancer death in the world. New and improved screening tests for CRC are needed to detect the disease at an early stage and adopt patient management strategies to decrease the death toll. The three pillars of CRC screening are endoscopy, radiological imaging, and molecular assays. Endoscopic procedures comprise traditional colonoscopy, and more recently, capsule-based endoscopy. The main imaging modality remains Computed Tomography (CT) of the colon. Molecular approaches continue to grow in the diversity of biomarkers and the sophistication of the technologies deployed to detect them. What started with simple fecal occult blood tests has expanded to an armamentarium, including mutation detection and identification of aberrant epigenetic signatures known to be oncogenic. Biomarker-based screening methods have critical advantages and are likely to eclipse the classical modalities of imaging and endoscopy in the future. For example, imaging methods are costly and require highly specialized medical personnel. In the case of endoscopy, their invasiveness limits compliance from large swaths of the population, especially those with average CRC risk. Beyond mere discomfort and fear, there are legitimate iatrogenic concerns associated with endoscopy. The risks of perforation and infection make endoscopy best suited for a confirmatory role in cases where there are positive results from other diagnostic tests. Biomarker-based screening methods are largely non-invasive and are growing in scope. Epigenetic biomarkers, in particular, can be detected in feces and blood, are less invasive to the average-risk patient, detect early-stage CRC, and have a demonstrably superior patient follow-up. Given the heterogeneity of CRC as it evolves, optimal screening may require a battery of blood and stool tests, where each can leverage different pathways perturbed during carcinogenesis. What follows is a comprehensive, systematic review of the literature pertaining to the screening and diagnostic protocols used in CRC. Relevant articles were retrieved from the PubMed database using keywords including: "Screening", "Diagnosis", and "Biomarkers for CRC". American and European clinical trials in progress were included as well.
结直肠癌(CRC)是全球癌症发病率和死亡率的重要因素(前五名)。散发性 CRC 的病因与遗传和表观遗传改变的积累有关,这些改变导致癌症标志的出现,如异常增殖、逃避免疫破坏、抗凋亡、复制永生等,从而促进癌症的发生、侵袭和转移。据估计,每年全世界至少有 400 万人被诊断患有 CRC。根据 CRC 的诊断分期,许多患者会死亡,因为 CRC 是全球癌症死亡的前四大原因之一。需要新的和改进的 CRC 筛查测试来早期发现疾病,并采取患者管理策略来降低死亡率。CRC 筛查的三大支柱是内窥镜检查、放射影像学和分子检测。内窥镜检查包括传统的结肠镜检查,以及最近的胶囊内镜检查。主要的成像方式仍然是结肠计算机断层扫描(CT)。分子方法继续在生物标志物的多样性和用于检测它们的技术的复杂性方面发展。从简单的粪便潜血试验开始,已经扩展到包括突变检测和鉴定已知致癌的异常表观遗传特征的武器库。基于生物标志物的筛查方法具有重要的优势,并且可能在未来超越成像和内窥镜检查等经典方法。例如,成像方法成本高昂,需要高度专业化的医疗人员。在内窥镜检查的情况下,其侵入性限制了大多数人群的依从性,尤其是那些具有平均 CRC 风险的人群。除了不适和恐惧之外,内窥镜检查还存在合理的医源性问题。穿孔和感染的风险使内窥镜检查最适合在其他诊断测试有阳性结果的情况下作为确认作用。基于生物标志物的筛查方法在很大程度上是非侵入性的,并且正在不断扩展。特别是,表观遗传生物标志物可以在粪便和血液中检测到,对一般风险患者的侵入性较小,可检测早期 CRC,并具有明显更好的患者随访。鉴于 CRC 在其发展过程中的异质性,最佳筛查可能需要一系列血液和粪便测试,其中每种测试都可以利用致癌过程中受干扰的不同途径。以下是对 CRC 筛查和诊断方案的文献进行的全面、系统的综述。使用关键词“Screening”、“Diagnosis”和“Biomarkers for CRC”从 PubMed 数据库中检索相关文章。还包括正在进行的美国和欧洲临床试验。