Department of Family Medicine, Brown University Warren Alpert Medical School, Providence, RI, United States of America.
Providence Community Health Centers, Providence, RI, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 13;16(12):e0249980. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249980. eCollection 2021.
To evaluate the diagnostic value of symptoms used by daycares and schools to screen children and adolescents for SARS-CoV-2 infection, we analyzed data from a primary care setting.
This cohort study included all patients ≤17 years old who were evaluated at Providence Community Health Centers (PCHC; Providence, U.S.), for COVID-19 symptoms and/or exposure, and received SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing between March-June 2020. Participants were identified from PCHC electronic medical records. For three age groups- 0-4, 5-11, and 12-17 years-we estimated the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) of individual symptoms and three symptom combinations: a case definition published by the Rhode Island Department of Health (RIDOH), and two novel combinations generated by different statistical approaches to maximize sensitivity, specificity, and AUC. We evaluated symptom combinations both with and without consideration of COVID-19 exposure. Myalgia, headache, sore throat, abdominal pain, nausea, anosmia, and ageusia were not assessed in 0-4 year-olds due to the lower reliability of these symptoms in this group.
Of 555 participants, 217 (39.1%) were SARS-CoV-2-infected. Fever was more common among 0-4 years-olds (p = 0.002); older children more frequently reported fatigue (p = 0.02). In children ≥5 years old, anosmia or ageusia had 94-98% specificity. In all ages, exposure history most accurately predicted infection. With respect to individual symptoms, cough most accurately predicted infection in <5 year-olds (AUC 0.69) and 12-17 year-olds (AUC 0.62), while headache was most accurate in 5-11 year-olds (AUC 0.62). In combination with exposure history, the novel symptom combinations generated statistically to maximize test characteristics had sensitivity >95% but specificity <30%. No symptom or symptom combination had AUC ≥0.70.
Anosmia or ageusia in children ≥5 years old should raise providers' index of suspicion for COVID-19. However, our overall findings underscore the limited diagnostic value of symptoms.
为了评估日托所和学校用于筛查儿童和青少年 SARS-CoV-2 感染的症状的诊断价值,我们分析了初级保健环境中的数据。
本队列研究包括所有在普罗维登斯社区卫生中心(普罗维登斯,美国)因 COVID-19 症状和/或接触而接受评估并在 2020 年 3 月至 6 月期间接受 SARS-CoV-2 聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测的≤17 岁的患者。参与者是从普罗维登斯社区卫生中心的电子病历中确定的。对于 0-4 岁、5-11 岁和 12-17 岁三个年龄组,我们估计了单个症状和三个症状组合的敏感性、特异性和接收者操作特征曲线(AUC)下面积:罗得岛州卫生署(RIDOH)发布的病例定义,以及两种通过不同的统计方法生成的新组合,以最大限度地提高敏感性、特异性和 AUC。我们评估了是否考虑 COVID-19 暴露对症状组合的影响。0-4 岁的患儿由于这些症状在此组中的可靠性较低,因此不评估肌痛、头痛、喉咙痛、腹痛、恶心、嗅觉丧失和味觉丧失。
在 555 名参与者中,有 217 名(39.1%)感染了 SARS-CoV-2。发热在 0-4 岁儿童中更为常见(p=0.002);年龄较大的儿童更常报告疲劳(p=0.02)。在≥5 岁的儿童中,嗅觉丧失或味觉丧失的特异性为 94-98%。在所有年龄段中,暴露史最能准确预测感染。就单个症状而言,咳嗽在<5 岁儿童(AUC 0.69)和 12-17 岁儿童(AUC 0.62)中最能准确预测感染,而头痛在 5-11 岁儿童(AUC 0.62)中最准确。与暴露史相结合,为最大限度地提高测试特征而生成的新型症状组合的敏感性>95%,但特异性<30%。没有任何症状或症状组合的 AUC≥0.70。
≥5 岁儿童嗅觉丧失或味觉丧失应引起医务人员对 COVID-19 的警惕。然而,我们的总体发现强调了症状的诊断价值有限。