Schmalstieg-Bahr Katharina, Popert Uwe Wolfgang, Scherer Martin
Department of General Practice and Primary Care, University Medical Center Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Department of General Practice, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Nov 25;8:680695. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.680695. eCollection 2021.
According to the WHO, in a complex system, "there are so many interacting parts that it is difficult (…), to predict the behavior of the system based on knowledge of its component parts. "In countries without general practitioner (GP)-gatekeeping, the number of possible interactions and therefore the complexity increases. Patients may consult any doctor without contacting their GP. Family medicine core values, e.g., comprehensive care, and core tasks, e.g., care coordination, might be harder to implement and maintain. How are GPs perceived and how do they perceive themselves if no GP-gatekeeping exists? Does the absence of any GP-gatekeeping influence family medicine core values? A PubMed and Cochrane search was performed. The results are summarized in form of a narrative review. Four perspectives regarding the GP's role were identified. The GPs' self-perception regarding family medicine core values and tasks is independent of their function as gatekeepers, but they appreciate this role. Patient satisfaction is also independent of the health care system. Depending on the acquisition of income, specialists have different opinions of GP-gatekeeping. Policymakers want GPs to play a central role within the health care system, but do not commit to full gatekeeping. The GPs and policymakers emphasize the importance of family medicine specialty training. Further international studies are needed to determine if family medicine core values and tasks can be better accomplished by GP-gatekeeping. Specialty training should be mandatory in all countries to enable GPs to fulfill these values and tasks and to act as coordinators and/or gatekeepers.
根据世界卫生组织的说法,在一个复杂的系统中,“存在如此多相互作用的部分,以至于很难(……)根据对其组成部分的了解来预测系统的行为。”在没有全科医生把关的国家,可能的相互作用数量以及因此产生的复杂性会增加。患者可以在不联系其全科医生的情况下咨询任何医生。家庭医学的核心价值观,例如全面护理,以及核心任务,例如护理协调,可能更难实施和维持。如果不存在全科医生把关,全科医生是如何被看待的,他们又如何看待自己?没有任何全科医生把关是否会影响家庭医学的核心价值观?我们进行了PubMed和Cochrane检索。结果以叙述性综述的形式进行了总结。确定了关于全科医生角色的四个观点。全科医生对家庭医学核心价值观和任务的自我认知独立于他们作为把关人的职能,但他们重视这一角色。患者满意度也独立于医疗保健系统。根据收入获取情况,专科医生对全科医生把关有不同的看法。政策制定者希望全科医生在医疗保健系统中发挥核心作用,但并不致力于全面把关。全科医生和政策制定者强调家庭医学专科培训的重要性。需要进一步开展国际研究,以确定通过全科医生把关是否能更好地实现家庭医学的核心价值观和任务。在所有国家,专科培训都应是强制性的,以使全科医生能够履行这些价值观和任务,并担任协调员和/或把关人。