• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索奥地利上奥地利州全科医生的工作:一项针对30家诊所的试点回顾性观察研究。

Exploring General Practitioner Work in Upper Austria: A Pilot Retrospective Observational Study Across Thirty Practices.

作者信息

Zelko Erika, Peinbauer Thomas, Voggenberger Lisa, Bekelaer Fabian, Pantoglou Julia, Stübl Denise, Rebhandl Erwin

机构信息

Institute of General Practice, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Altenberger Str. 69, 4040 Linz, Austria.

出版信息

Zdr Varst. 2025 Jan 2;64(1):49-58. doi: 10.2478/sjph-2025-0007. eCollection 2025 Mar.

DOI:10.2478/sjph-2025-0007
PMID:39758082
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11694631/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study investigates the differences in patient care across various organisational forms of general practitioners (GPs) in Upper Austria.

METHODS

Data was collected from GPs across Upper Austria, examining patient demographics, prescription patterns, staff employment, services offered and the proximity of practices to hospitals. The variability in recording patient visit reasons was also analysed.

RESULTS

Of the 30 participating GPs (Response Rate 5.1%), 17 worked in single practices, 7 in group practices, and 6 in PHC units. In our sample, single practices tend to prescribe more medications for chronic conditions. Group practices and PHC centres are more prevalent in areas with larger populations, offer online appointment bookings more frequently and employ more staff. The study also highlights variability in documenting patient visit reasons, emphasising the need for standardised documentation practices. The most common reasons for the patient to contact their GP, based on ICPC-2 categories, were general and non-specific, respiratory and locomotor problems, and the most common chronic diseases seen in the practice are cardiovascular, endocrine diseases and locomotor system problems. The most common therapeutic procedures were counselling and prescription of medication.

CONCLUSION

Our study, the first of its kind, reveals significant insights into the variability and adaptability of general medicine outpatient practices in Upper Austria, highlighting the need for improved diagnosis coding at the primary care level.

摘要

引言

本研究调查了奥地利上奥地利州全科医生(GP)不同组织形式下的患者护理差异。

方法

收集了来自奥地利上奥地利州全科医生的数据,考察了患者人口统计学特征、处方模式、员工雇佣情况、提供的服务以及诊所与医院的距离。还分析了记录患者就诊原因的变异性。

结果

在30名参与研究的全科医生中(回复率5.1%),17人在个体诊所工作,7人在联合诊所工作,6人在初级卫生保健单位工作。在我们的样本中,个体诊所往往为慢性病开出更多药物。联合诊所和初级卫生保健中心在人口较多的地区更为普遍,更频繁地提供在线预约服务,且雇佣的员工更多。该研究还突出了记录患者就诊原因的变异性,强调了标准化记录做法的必要性。根据国际初级保健分类法(ICPC - 2)类别,患者联系全科医生最常见的原因是一般和非特异性问题、呼吸和运动问题,诊所中最常见的慢性病是心血管疾病、内分泌疾病和运动系统问题。最常见的治疗程序是咨询和药物处方。

结论

我们的研究尚属首次,揭示了奥地利上奥地利州普通内科门诊实践的变异性和适应性的重要见解,突出了在初级保健层面改进诊断编码的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83c2/11694631/f5b02dce74d0/j_sjph-2025-0007_fig_001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83c2/11694631/f5b02dce74d0/j_sjph-2025-0007_fig_001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83c2/11694631/f5b02dce74d0/j_sjph-2025-0007_fig_001.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring General Practitioner Work in Upper Austria: A Pilot Retrospective Observational Study Across Thirty Practices.探索奥地利上奥地利州全科医生的工作:一项针对30家诊所的试点回顾性观察研究。
Zdr Varst. 2025 Jan 2;64(1):49-58. doi: 10.2478/sjph-2025-0007. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Organising general practice for care homes: a multi-method study.为养老院组织全科医疗服务:一项多方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Apr;13(11):1-68. doi: 10.3310/YNDV6358.
3
Primary health care teams put to the test a cross-sectional study from Austria within the QUALICOPC project.初级卫生保健团队在QUALICOPC项目中对一项来自奥地利的横断面研究进行了检验。
BMC Fam Pract. 2015 Nov 16;16:168. doi: 10.1186/s12875-015-0384-9.
4
Implementation of evidence-based knowledge in general practice.循证医学知识在全科医疗中的应用。
Dan Med J. 2017 Dec;64(12).
5
Current experience and future potential of facilitating access to digital NHS primary care services in England: the Di-Facto mixed-methods study.当前在英格兰促进获取数字国民保健服务初级保健服务的经验和未来潜力:Di-Facto 混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep;12(32):1-197. doi: 10.3310/JKYT5803.
6
Comparison of rural and urban French GPs' activity: a cross-sectional study.农村和城市法国全科医生活动比较:一项横断面研究。
Rural Remote Health. 2021 Sep;21(3):5865. doi: 10.22605/RRH5865. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
7
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of first contact physiotherapy for musculoskeletal disorders in primary care: the FRONTIER, mixed method realist evaluation.基层医疗中针对肌肉骨骼疾病的首次接触物理治疗的临床效果和成本效益:FRONTIER混合方法实证评估
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Dec;12(49):1-187. doi: 10.3310/RTKY7521.
8
Regional differences in reasons for consultation and general practitioners' spectrum of services in northern Germany - results of a cross-sectional observational study.德国北部地区就诊原因和全科医生服务范围的地域差异——一项横断面观察性研究的结果。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Jan 31;21(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-1093-6.
9
Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.基层医疗研究团队评估(PCRTA):开发与评估
Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 2002 Feb(81):iii-vi, 1-72.
10
GP Practices as a One-Stop Shop: How Do Patients Perceive the Quality of Care? A Cross-Sectional Study in Thirty-Four Countries.全科医生诊所作为一站式服务:患者如何看待医疗质量?三十四个国家的横断面研究。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug;53(4):2047-2063. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12754. Epub 2017 Dec 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Is Value-Based Health Care Just the Latest Fad or can it Transform the Slovenian Health Care System?基于价值的医疗保健只是最新的一时风尚,还是能够改变斯洛文尼亚的医疗保健系统?
Zdr Varst. 2023 Mar 15;62(2):55-58. doi: 10.2478/sjph-2023-0008. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
The Göktaş definition of family medicine/general practice.家庭医学/全科医学的戈克塔什定义。
Aten Primaria. 2022 Oct;54(10):102468. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2022.102468. Epub 2022 Sep 19.
3
The Role of General Practice in Complex Health Care Systems.全科医疗在复杂医疗体系中的作用。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Nov 25;8:680695. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.680695. eCollection 2021.
4
Germany: Health System Review.德国:卫生体系综述。
Health Syst Transit. 2020 Dec;22(6):1-272.
5
Core Values of Family Medicine in Europe: Current State and Challenges.欧洲家庭医学的核心价值观:现状与挑战
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Feb 23;8:646353. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.646353. eCollection 2021.
6
A systematic review of contributing factors of and solutions to electronic health record-related impacts on physician well-being.系统评价电子健康记录对医生健康影响的相关因素和解决方案。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Apr 23;28(5):974-984. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa339.
7
Successful Implementation of Integrated Care in Slovenian Primary Care.斯洛文尼亚初级保健中综合护理的成功实施。
Zdr Varst. 2020 Dec 31;60(1):1-3. doi: 10.2478/sjph-2021-0001. eCollection 2020 Dec.
8
The association between the workload of general practitioners and patient experiences with care: results of a cross-sectional study in 33 countries.全科医生工作量与患者就医体验的关联:33 个国家的横断面研究结果。
Hum Resour Health. 2020 Oct 16;18(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12960-020-00520-9.
9
Norway: Health System Review.挪威:卫生体系综述。
Health Syst Transit. 2020 Jan;22(1):1-163.
10
Communication between general practitioners and medical specialists in the referral process: a cross-sectional survey in 34 countries.全科医生和转诊过程中的医学专家之间的沟通:34 个国家的横断面调查。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Mar 17;21(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01124-x.