Lin Chunfang, Fan Haibo, Chen Wenjun, Cui Lingzhi
Department of General Surgery, The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Department of Targeted Therapy, Shanxi Cancer Hospital, Taiyuan, China.
Front Surg. 2021 Nov 26;8:723065. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.723065. eCollection 2021.
Advanced gastric cancer is the fifth leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Patients with metastatic advanced gastric cancer commonly develop a gastric outlet obstruction that considerably worsens their quality of life. Surgical interventions such as gastrojejunostomy and palliative gastrectomy are commonly administered to alleviate this obstruction. However, whether one intervention is better than another at improving morbidity- and mortality-related outcomes is unclear. Thus, in this meta-analysis, we compare outcomes of palliative gastrectomy and gastrojejunostomy (overall hospital stay length, time to oral intake, survival, and complication rates) in patients with metastatic advanced gastric cancer to identify the best procedure. To compare morbidity and mortality outcomes of palliative gastrectomy and gastrojejunostomy in patients with metastatic advanced gastric cancer. We followed the PRISMA guidelines to systematically search Web of Science, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Scopus, and MEDLINE for relevant studies. We conducted a random-effects meta-analysis to find differential outcomes between palliative gastrectomy and gastrojejunostomy among variables such as time to oral intake, overall hospital stay length, complication rates, and survival in patients with metastatic advanced gastric cancer. From 963 studies, we found 7 eligible studies with 642 patients (70.3 ± 4.7 years) who had undergone palliative gastrectomy or gastrojejunostomy. Our meta-analysis revealed an insignificant ( > 0.05) differences in terms of overall survival duration (Hedge's , 1.22), complication risks (odds ratio, 1.35), and time to oral intake (, 0.62) and hospital stay length (, 0.12) between patients undergoing gastrojejunostomy and palliative gastrectomy. In this present study we observed no statistically significant differences in terms of morbidity and mortality outcomes after palliative gastrectomy and gastrojejunostomy in patients with metastatic advanced gastric cancer. Therefore, no conclusions can be drawn for the variables evaluated. This study provides a preliminary overview of the risks associated with gastrojejunostomy and palliative gastrectomy to help gastroenterologists manage patients with metastatic advanced-stage gastric cancer.
进展期胃癌是癌症相关死亡的第五大主要原因。转移性进展期胃癌患者通常会出现胃出口梗阻,这会严重恶化他们的生活质量。通常会采取诸如胃空肠吻合术和姑息性胃切除术等手术干预措施来缓解这种梗阻。然而,一种干预措施在改善发病率和死亡率相关结局方面是否优于另一种尚不清楚。因此,在这项荟萃分析中,我们比较了转移性进展期胃癌患者姑息性胃切除术和胃空肠吻合术的结局(总体住院时间、开始经口进食时间、生存率和并发症发生率),以确定最佳手术方式。为了比较转移性进展期胃癌患者姑息性胃切除术和胃空肠吻合术的发病率和死亡率结局。我们遵循PRISMA指南,系统检索了科学网、EMBASE、CENTRAL、Scopus和MEDLINE以查找相关研究。我们进行了随机效应荟萃分析,以找出转移性进展期胃癌患者在开始经口进食时间、总体住院时间、并发症发生率和生存率等变量方面姑息性胃切除术和胃空肠吻合术之间的差异结局。从963项研究中,我们找到了7项符合条件的研究,涉及642例(70.3±4.7岁)接受了姑息性胃切除术或胃空肠吻合术的患者。我们的荟萃分析显示,接受胃空肠吻合术和姑息性胃切除术的患者在总生存时间(Hedge's,1.22)、并发症风险(比值比,1.35)、开始经口进食时间(,0.62)和住院时间(,0.12)方面存在无显著差异(>0.05)。在本研究中,我们观察到转移性进展期胃癌患者接受姑息性胃切除术和胃空肠吻合术后在发病率和死亡率结局方面无统计学显著差异。因此,对于所评估的变量无法得出结论。本研究提供了与胃空肠吻合术和姑息性胃切除术相关风险的初步概述,以帮助胃肠病学家管理转移性晚期胃癌患者。