Suppr超能文献

curing 光和曝光时间对磨牙中大块充填型树脂基复合材料聚合的影响。

Effect of Curing Light and Exposure Time on the Polymerization of Bulk-Fill Resin-Based Composites in Molar Teeth.

出版信息

Oper Dent. 2020 May/Jun;45(3):E141-E155. doi: 10.2341/19-126-L. Epub 2020 Feb 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study examined the influence of different light-curing units (LCUs) and exposure times on the microhardness across bulk-fill resin-based composite (RBC) restorations in a molar tooth.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Tip diameter, radiant power, radiant exitance, emission spectra, and light beam profile were measured on two single-emission-peak LCUs (Celalux 3 and DeepCure-S) and two multiple-peak LCUs (Bluephase 20i and Valo Grand). A mold was made using a human molar that had a 12-mm mesial-distal length, a 2.5-mm deep occlusal box, and two 4.5-mm deep proximal boxes. Two bulk-fill RBCs (Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior and Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill) were photoactivated for 10 seconds and for 20 seconds, with the light guide positioned at the center of the occlusal surface. Microhardness was then measured across the transverse surface of the restorations. The light that reached the bottom of the proximal boxes was examined. Data were statistically analyzed with the Student -test, two-way analysis of variance, and the Tukey test (=0.05).

RESULTS

The four LCUs were different regarding all the tested characteristics. Even when using LCUs with wide tips and a homogeneous beam profile, there were significant differences in the microhardness results obtained at the central and proximal regions of the RBCs (<0.05). LCUs with wider tips used for 20 seconds produced higher microhardness values (<0.05). The multiple-peak LCUs produced greater hardness values in Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill than did the single-emission-peak LCUs (Celalux 3 and DeepCure-S). Results for the light measured at the bottom of proximal boxes showed that little light reached these regions when the light tip was positioned at the center of restorations.

CONCLUSIONS

Curing lights with wide tips, homogeneous light beam profiles, and longer exposure times are preferred when light-curing large MOD restorations. Light curing from more than one position may be required for adequate photopolymerization.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨不同光固化器(LCU)和曝光时间对磨牙中大块充填型树脂基复合材料(RBC)修复体的显微硬度的影响。

方法和材料

对两种单发射峰 LCU(Celalux 3 和 DeepCure-S)和两种多峰 LCU(Bluephase 20i 和 Valo Grand)进行了尖端直径、辐射功率、辐射出射度、发射光谱和光束轮廓的测量。使用一个有 12mm 近远中长度、2.5mm 深的咬合盒和两个 4.5mm 深的近中盒的人磨牙制作了一个模具。两种大块充填 RBC(Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior 和 Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill)分别用光导器置于咬合面中心进行 10 秒和 20 秒的光激活。然后在修复体的横截面上测量显微硬度。检查到达近中盒底部的光。使用 Student -检验、双因素方差分析和 Tukey 检验对数据进行统计分析(=0.05)。

结果

四种 LCU 在所有测试特性方面均存在差异。即使使用尖端较宽且光束分布均匀的 LCU,在 RBC 中央和近中区域获得的显微硬度结果仍存在显著差异(<0.05)。使用较宽尖端的 LCU 进行 20 秒的光固化可产生更高的显微硬度值(<0.05)。多峰 LCU 在 Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill 中产生的硬度值大于单发射峰 LCU(Celalux 3 和 DeepCure-S)。近中盒底部测量的光结果表明,当光尖端位于修复体中心时,很少有光到达这些区域。

结论

在光固化大 MOD 修复体时,应优先选择尖端较宽、光束分布均匀、曝光时间较长的光固化器。可能需要从多个位置进行光固化以实现充分的光聚合。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验