School of Dentistry, UFF-Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, RJ, Brazil.
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental Materials Division, Piracicaba School of Dentistry, UNICAMP-Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.
Odontology. 2021 Oct;109(4):874-883. doi: 10.1007/s10266-021-00614-3. Epub 2021 May 23.
To determine the influence of light curing units (LCUs) and material viscosity on the degree of conversion (DC) of bulk-fill (BF) resin-based composites (RBCs) placed in deep cavity preparations. Four LCUs were tested: Valo cordless, Bluephase-G2, Poly wireless and Radii-cal. Light irradiance was determined at 0 mm and 6 mm distance to the reading sensor. The following RBCs were considered: Filtek BF, Filtek BF Flow, Opus BF, Opus BF Flow, Tetric N-Ceram BF and Surefil SDR Flow. Sirius-Z was used with the incremental technique. DC (n = 3) was evaluated by spectroscopy both at top and bottom regions of deep preparations with 6 mm depth. The data were submitted to ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). Pearson's correlation (95%) was used to verify the relation between the LCUs and the curing potential of RBCs. The DC at 6 mm depth was reduced when Opus BF, Opus BF Flow and Tetric N-Ceram BF were activated with Radii-cal. There was a positive correlation between the LCU irradiance and the bottom/top conversion ratios. The materials' viscosities did not affect the curing potential. Bulk-fill composites did not present higher curing potential than the conventional composite used with the incremental technique; the most important aspect of the LCU was the irradiance ratio; and the materials' viscosity did not affect the curing potential as a function of depth. Radii-cal negatively impacted the degree of conversion at 6 mm depth for most bulk-fill resin composites. Depending on the brand, bulk-fill composites may present reduced curing potential due to the light source when placed in deep cavities. Dentists should avoid LCU with acrylic tips to photoactivate bulk-fill resin-based composites.
为了确定光固化器(LCU)和材料粘度对放置在深腔预备体中的块状充填(BF)树脂基复合材料(RBC)的聚合度(DC)的影响。测试了四种 LCU:Valo 无绳、Bluephase-G2、Poly wireless 和 Radii-cal。在距离读数传感器 0mm 和 6mm 处测定光强度。考虑了以下 RBC:Filtek BF、Filtek BF Flow、Opus BF、Opus BF Flow、Tetric N-Ceram BF 和 Surefil SDR Flow。使用增量技术的 Sirius-Z。在 6mm 深度的深预备体的顶部和底部区域通过光谱法评估 DC(n=3)。将数据提交给 ANOVA 和 Tukey 检验(α=0.05)。使用 Pearson 相关(95%)验证 LCU 和 RBC 固化潜力之间的关系。当使用 Radii-cal 激活 Opus BF、Opus BF Flow 和 Tetric N-Ceram BF 时,6mm 深度的 DC 降低。LCU 光强度与底部/顶部转化率之间存在正相关。材料的粘度不会影响固化潜力。块状充填复合材料的固化潜力并不高于使用增量技术的常规复合材料;LCU 最重要的方面是光强比;并且材料的粘度不会影响深度固化潜力。Radii-cal 对大多数块状充填树脂复合材料在 6mm 深度的聚合度有负面影响。根据品牌的不同,由于放置在深腔中时光源的原因,块状充填复合材料可能会表现出较低的固化潜力。牙医应避免使用带有丙烯酸尖端的 LCU 来光活化块状充填树脂基复合材料。