Rousset Vincent, Pleijel Fredrik, Rouse Greg W, Erséus Christer, Siddall Mark E
Laboratory of Molecular Systematics, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Box 50007, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden and Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, Department of Zoology, PO Box 1172 Blindern, NO-0318 Oslo, Norway.
Department of Marine Ecology, Tjärnö Marine Biological Laboratory, Göteborg University, SE-452 96 Strömstad, Sweden, and Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Département Systématique et Evolution, CNRS UMR 7138, "Systématique, Adaptation, Evolution", 43 rue Cuvier, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France.
Cladistics. 2007 Feb;23(1):41-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2006.00128.x. Epub 2006 Oct 6.
We present parsimony analyses of annelids based on the largest taxon sample and most extensive molecular data set yet assembled, with two nuclear ribosomal genes (18S rDNA and the D1 region of 28S rDNA), one nuclear protein coding-gene (Histone H3) and one mitochondrial ribosomal gene (16S rDNA) from 217 terminal taxa. Of these, 267 sequences are newly sequenced, and the remaining were obtained from GenBank. The included taxa are based on the criteria that the taxon must have 18S rDNA or at least two other loci. Our analyses show that 68% of annelid family ranked taxa represented by more than one taxon in our study are supported by a jackknife value > 50%. In spite of the size of our data set, the phylogenetic signal in the deepest part of the tree remains weak and the majority of the currently recognized major polychaete clades (except Amphinomida and Aphroditiformia) could not be recovered. Terbelliformia is monophyletic (with the exclusion of Pectinariidae, for which only 18S data were available), whereas members of taxa such as Phyllodocida, Cirratuliformia, Sabellida and Scolecida are scattered over the trees. Clitellata is monophyletic, although Dinophilidae should possibly be included, and Clitellata has a sister group within the polychaetes. One major problem is the current lack of knowledge on the closest relatives to annelids and the position of the annelid root. We suggest that the poor resolution in the basal parts of the trees presented here may be due to lack of signal connected to incomplete data sets both in terms of terminal and gene sampling, rapid radiation events and/or uneven evolutionary rates and long-branch attraction.
我们基于迄今所汇集的最大分类单元样本和最广泛的分子数据集,对环节动物进行了简约分析,该数据集包含来自217个终端分类单元的两个核糖体基因(18S rDNA和28S rDNA的D1区域)、一个核蛋白编码基因(组蛋白H3)和一个线粒体核糖体基因(16S rDNA)。其中,267个序列是新测序的,其余序列则从GenBank获取。纳入的分类单元基于这样的标准:该分类单元必须有18S rDNA或至少另外两个基因座。我们的分析表明,在我们的研究中,由多个分类单元代表的环节动物科级分类单元中有68%得到了大于50%的自展值支持。尽管我们的数据集规模较大,但树的最基部的系统发育信号仍然较弱,目前大多数公认的主要多毛纲类群(除了矶沙蚕目和鳞沙蚕亚目)无法恢复。蛰龙介目是单系的(不包括仅提供了18S数据的帚毛虫科),而叶须虫目、盘管虫亚目、缨鳃虫目和海稚虫目的分类单元成员则分散在各个树中。寡毛纲是单系的,尽管艾氏虫科可能应该被纳入,并且寡毛纲在多毛纲中有一个姐妹群。一个主要问题是目前对于环节动物最亲近的亲属以及环节动物根的位置缺乏了解。我们认为,这里呈现的树的基部解析度较差可能是由于在终端和基因采样方面缺乏与不完整数据集相关的信号、快速辐射事件和/或不均匀的进化速率以及长枝吸引。