Sereno Paul C
Cladistics. 2007 Dec;23(6):565-587. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2007.00161.x.
Systematists have questioned the distinction between characters and character states and their alignment with the traditional concept of homology. Previous definitions for character and character state show surprising variation. Here it is concluded that characters are simply features expressed as independent variables and character states the mutually exclusive conditions of a character. Together, characters and character states compose what are here termed character statements. Character statements are composed of only four fundamental functional components here identified as locator, variable, variable qualifier, and character state, and these components exist in only two patterns, neomorphic and transformational. Several controversies in character coding and the use of "absent" as a character state are understood here as a consequence of incomplete character statements and the inappropriate mixing of neomorphic and transformational character statements. Only a few logically complete patterns for morphological character data exist; their adoption promises to greatly reduce current variability in character data between analyses.
分类学家对性状与性状状态之间的区别以及它们与传统同源概念的一致性提出了质疑。先前对性状和性状状态的定义显示出惊人的差异。这里得出的结论是,性状仅仅是作为独立变量表达的特征,而性状状态是性状的相互排斥条件。性状和性状状态共同构成了这里所称的性状陈述。性状陈述仅由这里确定为定位器、变量、变量限定词和性状状态的四个基本功能组件组成,并且这些组件仅以两种模式存在,即新形态模式和转换模式。这里将性状编码中的几个争议以及将“缺失”用作性状状态理解为不完整性状陈述以及新形态性状陈述和转换性状陈述不适当混合的结果。形态性状数据仅存在少数逻辑上完整的模式;采用它们有望大大减少当前分析之间性状数据的变异性。