• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伊朗获得每质量调整生命年的支付意愿价值:一种修正的连锁方法。

Value of willingness to pay for a QALY gained in Iran; a modified chained-approach.

机构信息

Department of Health Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Dec 14;21(1):1339. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07344-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-021-07344-w
PMID:34906099
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8670027/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Due to the lack of a constant Willingness to Pay per one additional Quality Adjusted Life Years gained based on the preferences of Iran's general public, the cost-effectiveness of health system interventions is unclear and making it challenging to apply economic evaluation to health resources priority setting.

METHODS

We have measured this cost-effectiveness threshold with the participation of 2854 individuals from five provinces, each representing an income quintile, using a modified Time Trade-Off-based Chained-Approach. In this online-based empirical survey, to extract the health utility value, participants were randomly assigned to one of two green (21121) and yellow (22222) health scenarios designed based on the earlier validated EQ-5D-3L questionnaire.

RESULTS

Across the two health state versions, mean values for one QALY gain (rounded) ranged from $6740-$7400 and $6480-$7120, respectively, for aggregate and trimmed models, which are equivalent to 1.35-1.18 times of the GDP per capita. Log-linear Multivariate OLS regression analysis confirmed that respondents were more likely to pay if their income, disutility, and education level were higher than their counterparts.

CONCLUSIONS

In the health system of Iran, any intervention that is with the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, equal to and less than 7402.12 USD, will be considered cost-effective.

摘要

背景

由于缺乏基于伊朗普通公众偏好的每额外获得一个质量调整生命年的意愿支付意愿,卫生系统干预措施的成本效益尚不清楚,这使得将经济评估应用于卫生资源优先排序具有挑战性。

方法

我们使用经过修正的基于时间权衡的链式方法,让来自五个省份的 2854 名参与者参与,衡量了这一成本效益阈值。在这个基于在线的实证调查中,为了提取健康效用值,参与者被随机分配到两个绿色(21121)和黄色(22222)健康情景中的一个,这两个情景是基于之前验证过的 EQ-5D-3L 问卷设计的。

结果

在这两种健康状况版本中,一轮 QALY 增益的平均值(四舍五入)分别为 6740 美元至 7400 美元和 6480 美元至 7120 美元,适用于总模型和修剪模型,这分别相当于人均 GDP 的 1.35 倍至 1.18 倍。对数线性多元 OLS 回归分析证实,如果受访者的收入、不舒适和教育水平高于其同行,他们更有可能支付。

结论

在伊朗的卫生系统中,任何增量成本效益比等于或低于 7402.12 美元的干预措施都将被认为是具有成本效益的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8251/8670027/0e40d6575ae4/12913_2021_7344_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8251/8670027/87683998ca15/12913_2021_7344_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8251/8670027/31114dca7f40/12913_2021_7344_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8251/8670027/d88f5f24e575/12913_2021_7344_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8251/8670027/0e40d6575ae4/12913_2021_7344_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8251/8670027/87683998ca15/12913_2021_7344_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8251/8670027/31114dca7f40/12913_2021_7344_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8251/8670027/d88f5f24e575/12913_2021_7344_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8251/8670027/0e40d6575ae4/12913_2021_7344_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Value of willingness to pay for a QALY gained in Iran; a modified chained-approach.伊朗获得每质量调整生命年的支付意愿价值:一种修正的连锁方法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Dec 14;21(1):1339. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07344-w.
2
An exploratory study to estimate cost-effectiveness threshold value for life saving treatments in western Iran.一项关于估计伊朗西部挽救生命治疗的成本效益阈值的探索性研究。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2020 Oct 23;18:47. doi: 10.1186/s12962-020-00241-9. eCollection 2020.
3
Willingness to pay for one quality-adjusted life year in Iran.伊朗对一个质量调整生命年的支付意愿。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2019 Feb 28;17:4. doi: 10.1186/s12962-019-0172-9. eCollection 2019.
4
Willingness to pay for a QALY based on community member and patient preferences for temporary health states associated with herpes zoster.社区成员和患者对与带状疱疹相关的临时健康状态的偏好为基础的 QALY 的支付意愿。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2009;27(12):1005-16. doi: 10.2165/11314000-000000000-00000.
5
Cost-effectiveness of a population-based AAA screening program for men over 65 years old in Iran.伊朗针对65岁以上男性的基于人群的腹主动脉瘤筛查项目的成本效益。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2021 May 13;19(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12962-021-00283-7.
6
Willingness-to-Pay for One Quality-Adjusted Life-Year: A Population-Based Study from Iran.支付意愿一质量调整生命年:来自伊朗的一项基于人群的研究。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2018 Dec;16(6):837-846. doi: 10.1007/s40258-018-0424-4.
7
Willingness to Pay for One Additional Quality Adjusted Life Year: A Population Based Survey from China.支付意愿以获得额外一年质量调整生命年:来自中国的一项基于人群的调查。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2022 Nov;20(6):893-904. doi: 10.1007/s40258-022-00750-z. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
8
Estimating the range of incremental cost-effectiveness thresholds for healthcare based on willingness to pay and GDP per capita: A systematic review.基于支付意愿和人均 GDP 估算医疗保健增量成本效益阈值范围:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 14;17(4):e0266934. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266934. eCollection 2022.
9
Monetary Value of Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALY) among Patients with Cardiovascular Disease: a Willingness to Pay Study (WTP).心血管疾病患者质量调整生命年(QALY)的货币价值:一项支付意愿研究(WTP)
Iran J Pharm Res. 2017 Spring;16(2):823-833.
10
Adefovir dipivoxil and pegylated interferon alfa-2a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿德福韦酯与聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a治疗慢性乙型肝炎:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(28):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-183. doi: 10.3310/hta10280.

引用本文的文献

1
Willingness to Pay per QALY: A Systematic Review of Demand-Side Valuations with a Focus on Age and Disease Severity.每质量调整生命年的支付意愿:以年龄和疾病严重程度为重点的需求侧估值系统评价
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 Sep 17. doi: 10.1007/s40258-025-01005-3.
2
Economic evaluation of hypertension screening in Iran using a Markov model.使用马尔可夫模型对伊朗高血压筛查进行的经济评估。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 22;20(7):e0303223. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303223. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Value of a QALY and VSI estimated with the chained approach.用链接方法估计 QALY 和 VSI 的价值。
Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Sep;20(7):1063-1077. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01077-8. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
2
Valuation of Quality Weights for EuroQol 5-Dimensional Health States With the Time Trade-Off Method in the Capital of Iran.在伊朗首都采用时间权衡法对欧洲五维健康量表健康状态的质量权重进行评估。
Value Health Reg Issues. 2019 May;18:170-175. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2019.01.007. Epub 2019 May 13.
3
Willingness to pay for one quality-adjusted life year in Iran.
伊朗对一个质量调整生命年的支付意愿。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2019 Feb 28;17:4. doi: 10.1186/s12962-019-0172-9. eCollection 2019.
4
The Worth of a Quality-Adjusted Life-Year in Patients with Diabetes: An Investigation Study using a Willingness-to-Pay Method.糖尿病患者中质量调整生命年的价值:一项使用支付意愿法的调查研究。
Pharmacoecon Open. 2019 Sep;3(3):311-319. doi: 10.1007/s41669-018-0111-2.
5
Willingness-to-Pay for One Quality-Adjusted Life-Year: A Population-Based Study from Iran.支付意愿一质量调整生命年:来自伊朗的一项基于人群的研究。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2018 Dec;16(6):837-846. doi: 10.1007/s40258-018-0424-4.
6
Quantifying life: Understanding the history of Quality-Adjusted Life-Years (QALYs).量化生命:理解质量调整生命年(QALYs)的历史。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Aug;211:359-366. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.07.004. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
7
Monetary Value of Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALY) among Patients with Cardiovascular Disease: a Willingness to Pay Study (WTP).心血管疾病患者质量调整生命年(QALY)的货币价值:一项支付意愿研究(WTP)
Iran J Pharm Res. 2017 Spring;16(2):823-833.
8
Cost-effectiveness thresholds: pros and cons.成本效益阈值:利弊
Bull World Health Organ. 2016 Dec 1;94(12):925-930. doi: 10.2471/BLT.15.164418. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
9
Prevalence and Associated Factors of Genital and Sexually Transmitted Infections in Married Women of Iran.伊朗已婚女性生殖器及性传播感染的患病率及相关因素
Oman Med J. 2016 Nov;31(6):439-445. doi: 10.5001/omj.2016.88.
10
Understanding and improving the one and three times GDP per capita cost-effectiveness thresholds.理解并提高人均GDP的一倍和三倍成本效益阈值。
Health Policy Plan. 2017 Feb;32(1):141-145. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czw096. Epub 2016 Jul 24.