• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心血管疾病患者质量调整生命年(QALY)的货币价值:一项支付意愿研究(WTP)

Monetary Value of Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALY) among Patients with Cardiovascular Disease: a Willingness to Pay Study (WTP).

作者信息

Moradi Najmeh, Rashidian Arash, Rasekh Hamid Reza, Olyaeemanesh Alireza, Foroughi Mahnoosh, Mohammadi Teymoor

机构信息

School of Pharmacy ,Shahid Beheshti University of medical sciences, Tehran, Iran.

School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Iran J Pharm Res. 2017 Spring;16(2):823-833.

PMID:28979338
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5603894/
Abstract

The aim of this study was to estimate the monetary value of a QALY among patients with heart disease and to identify its determinants. A cross-sectional survey was conducted through face-to-face interview on 196 patients with cardiovascular disease from two heart hospitals in Tehran, Iran, to estimate the value of QALY using disaggregated and aggregated approaches. The EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) questionnaire, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Time Trade-Off (TTO) and contingent valuation WTP techniques were employed, first to elicit patients' preferences and then, to estimate WTP for QALY. The association of patients' characteristics with WTP for QALY, was assessed through Heckman selection model. The Mean willingness to pay per QALY, estimated by the disaggregated approach ranged from 2,799 to 3599 US dollars. It is higher than the values, estimated from aggregated methods (USD 2,256 to 3,137). However, in both approaches, the values were less than one Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita of Iran. Significant variables were: Current health state, education, age, marital status, number of comorbidities, and household's cost group. Our results challenge two major issues: the first, is a policy challenge which concerns the WHO recommendation to use less than 3 GDP per capita as a cost-effectiveness threshold value. The second, is an analytical challenge related to patients with zero QALY gain. More scrutiny is suggested on the issue of how patients with full health state valuation should be dealt with and what arbitrary value could be included in the estimation value of QALY when the disaggregated approach used.

摘要

本研究的目的是估计心脏病患者中质量调整生命年(QALY)的货币价值,并确定其决定因素。通过对伊朗德黑兰两家心脏病医院的196名心血管疾病患者进行面对面访谈,开展了一项横断面调查,以使用分解法和综合法估计QALY的价值。采用了欧洲五维健康量表(EQ-5D)问卷、视觉模拟量表(VAS)、时间权衡法(TTO)和条件估值支付意愿(WTP)技术,首先引出患者的偏好,然后估计QALY的WTP。通过Heckman选择模型评估患者特征与QALY的WTP之间的关联。用分解法估计的每QALY平均支付意愿为2799至3599美元。该值高于用综合法估计的值(2256至3137美元)。然而,在两种方法中,这些值均低于伊朗人均国内生产总值(GDP)。显著变量包括:当前健康状况、教育程度、年龄、婚姻状况、合并症数量和家庭成本组。我们的研究结果对两个主要问题提出了挑战:第一,是一个政策挑战,涉及世界卫生组织建议将人均GDP的3倍以下作为成本效益阈值。第二,是一个与QALY增益为零的患者相关的分析挑战。建议对如何处理完全健康状态估值的患者以及在使用分解法时QALY估计值中可纳入何种任意值的问题进行更多审查。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4d6/5603894/687ed3cc31eb/ijpr-16-823-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4d6/5603894/687ed3cc31eb/ijpr-16-823-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4d6/5603894/687ed3cc31eb/ijpr-16-823-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Monetary Value of Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALY) among Patients with Cardiovascular Disease: a Willingness to Pay Study (WTP).心血管疾病患者质量调整生命年(QALY)的货币价值:一项支付意愿研究(WTP)
Iran J Pharm Res. 2017 Spring;16(2):823-833.
2
Willingness to pay for one quality-adjusted life year in Iran.伊朗对一个质量调整生命年的支付意愿。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2019 Feb 28;17:4. doi: 10.1186/s12962-019-0172-9. eCollection 2019.
3
Estimation of the value of curative therapies in oncology: a willingness-to-pay study in China.肿瘤学中治愈性疗法价值的评估:一项在中国的支付意愿研究。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2023 Jun 5;21(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12962-023-00442-y.
4
An exploratory study to estimate cost-effectiveness threshold value for life saving treatments in western Iran.一项关于估计伊朗西部挽救生命治疗的成本效益阈值的探索性研究。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2020 Oct 23;18:47. doi: 10.1186/s12962-020-00241-9. eCollection 2020.
5
Willingness to pay per quality-adjusted life year for life-saving treatments in Thailand.泰国为挽救生命的治疗所支付的每质量调整生命年的意愿。
BMJ Open. 2015 Oct 5;5(10):e008123. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008123.
6
Willingness to Pay for One Additional Quality Adjusted Life Year: A Population Based Survey from China.支付意愿以获得额外一年质量调整生命年:来自中国的一项基于人群的调查。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2022 Nov;20(6):893-904. doi: 10.1007/s40258-022-00750-z. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
7
Willingness to pay for a QALY based on community member and patient preferences for temporary health states associated with herpes zoster.社区成员和患者对与带状疱疹相关的临时健康状态的偏好为基础的 QALY 的支付意愿。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2009;27(12):1005-16. doi: 10.2165/11314000-000000000-00000.
8
A systematic review of studies eliciting willingness-to-pay per quality-adjusted life year: does it justify CE threshold?对获取每质量调整生命年支付意愿的研究进行的系统评价:这是否能证明成本效益阈值的合理性?
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 9;10(4):e0122760. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122760. eCollection 2015.
9
Monetary value of health-a practical decision-making framework combining equity considerations and WTP.健康的货币价值——一个结合公平考量与支付意愿的实用决策框架
Eur J Health Econ. 2025 Mar;26(2):183-198. doi: 10.1007/s10198-024-01693-z. Epub 2024 May 20.
10
A Contingent Valuation Study for Eliciting a Monetary Value of a Quality-Adjusted Life-Year in the General Greek Population.对一般希腊人群体进行质量调整生命年货币价值的条件价值评估研究。
Value Health Reg Issues. 2020 Sep;22:36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2020.03.002. Epub 2020 Jul 27.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review on the direct approach to elicit the demand-side cost-effectiveness threshold: Implications for low- and middle-income countries.一项关于直接 elicitation 需求方成本效益阈值的系统评价:对低收入和中等收入国家的启示。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 8;19(2):e0297450. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297450. eCollection 2024.
2
Estimating the cost-effectiveness threshold of advanced non-small cell lung cancer in China using mean opportunity cost and contingent valuation method.运用平均机会成本法和条件价值评估法估算中国晚期非小细胞肺癌的成本效益阈值。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2023 Nov 2;21(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12962-023-00487-z.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Determination of Cost-Effectiveness Threshold For Malaysia.马来西亚成本效益阈值的确定。
Value Health. 2014 Nov;17(7):A438. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.08.1137. Epub 2014 Oct 26.
2
Population-Based Preference Weights for the EQ-5D Health States Using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) in Iran.伊朗使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)对EQ-5D健康状态进行的基于人群的偏好权重研究。
Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2016 Feb 13;18(2):e21584. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.21584. eCollection 2016 Feb.
3
A systematic review of studies eliciting willingness-to-pay per quality-adjusted life year: does it justify CE threshold?
Estimation of the value of curative therapies in oncology: a willingness-to-pay study in China.
肿瘤学中治愈性疗法价值的评估:一项在中国的支付意愿研究。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2023 Jun 5;21(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12962-023-00442-y.
4
Determination of a cost-effectiveness threshold for cancer interventions in Iran.伊朗癌症干预措施成本效益阈值的确定。
Front Oncol. 2022 Dec 12;12:1039589. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1039589. eCollection 2022.
5
Cost-effectiveness analysis of fractional flow reserve versus angiography among patients with coronary artery disease undergoing borderline coronary lesions treatment in Iran.伊朗接受临界冠状动脉病变治疗的冠心病患者中,血流储备分数与血管造影术的成本效益分析。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2022 Dec 8;20(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12962-022-00402-y.
6
Value of willingness to pay for a QALY gained in Iran; a modified chained-approach.伊朗获得每质量调整生命年的支付意愿价值:一种修正的连锁方法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Dec 14;21(1):1339. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07344-w.
7
Willingness to pay for a quality-adjusted life year: a systematic review with meta-regression.支付意愿以获得质量调整生命年:系统综述和荟萃回归分析。
Eur J Health Econ. 2022 Mar;23(2):277-299. doi: 10.1007/s10198-021-01364-3. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
8
Comparing the monetary value of a quality-adjusted life year from the payment card and the open-ended format.比较支付卡法和开放式格式下质量调整生命年的货币价值。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2021 Jul 19;19(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12962-021-00298-0.
9
Health professionals' willingness to pay and associated factors for cervical cancer screening program at College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Northwest Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚贡德尔医科大学健康科学学院卫生专业人员对宫颈癌筛查计划的支付意愿及其影响因素。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 30;14(4):e0215904. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215904. eCollection 2019.
10
Willingness to pay for one quality-adjusted life year in Iran.伊朗对一个质量调整生命年的支付意愿。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2019 Feb 28;17:4. doi: 10.1186/s12962-019-0172-9. eCollection 2019.
对获取每质量调整生命年支付意愿的研究进行的系统评价:这是否能证明成本效益阈值的合理性?
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 9;10(4):e0122760. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122760. eCollection 2015.
4
Exploring the willingness to pay for a quality-adjusted life-year in the state of Penang, Malaysia.探索马来西亚槟城州居民为质量调整生命年支付费用的意愿。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2014 Oct 23;6:473-81. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S67375. eCollection 2014.
5
Validation and comparison of EuroQoL-5 dimension (EQ-5D) and Short Form-6 dimension (SF-6D) among stable angina patients.稳定型心绞痛患者中欧洲五维度健康量表(EQ - 5D)与简短健康调查简表6维度(SF - 6D)的验证与比较
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Oct 25;12:156. doi: 10.1186/s12955-014-0156-6.
6
The Willingness to Pay for a Quality Adjusted Life Year: A Review of the Empirical Literature.支付意愿以获取质量调整生命年:实证文献综述。
Health Econ. 2015 Oct;24(10):1289-1301. doi: 10.1002/hec.3085. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
7
Challenges to time trade-off utility assessment methods: when should you consider alternative approaches?时间权衡效用评估方法面临的挑战:何时应考虑采用替代方法?
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2014 Jun;14(3):437-50. doi: 10.1586/14737167.2014.912562.
8
Estimating a WTP-based value of a QALY: the 'chained' approach.基于意愿支付法估计 QALY 价值:“链式”方法。
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Sep;92:92-104. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.05.013. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
9
Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.291 种疾病和伤害导致的伤残调整生命年(DALYs)在 21 个地区,1990-2010 年:全球疾病负担研究 2010 的系统分析。
Lancet. 2012 Dec 15;380(9859):2197-223. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61689-4.
10
Health outcomes in economic evaluation: who should value health?健康结果在经济评价中的应用:谁应该评估健康?
Br Med Bull. 2011;97:197-210. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldr001. Epub 2011 Jan 31.