• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Worth of a Quality-Adjusted Life-Year in Patients with Diabetes: An Investigation Study using a Willingness-to-Pay Method.糖尿病患者中质量调整生命年的价值:一项使用支付意愿法的调查研究。
Pharmacoecon Open. 2019 Sep;3(3):311-319. doi: 10.1007/s41669-018-0111-2.
2
Willingness to pay for one quality-adjusted life year in Iran.伊朗对一个质量调整生命年的支付意愿。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2019 Feb 28;17:4. doi: 10.1186/s12962-019-0172-9. eCollection 2019.
3
An exploratory study to estimate cost-effectiveness threshold value for life saving treatments in western Iran.一项关于估计伊朗西部挽救生命治疗的成本效益阈值的探索性研究。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2020 Oct 23;18:47. doi: 10.1186/s12962-020-00241-9. eCollection 2020.
4
Estimation of the value of curative therapies in oncology: a willingness-to-pay study in China.肿瘤学中治愈性疗法价值的评估:一项在中国的支付意愿研究。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2023 Jun 5;21(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12962-023-00442-y.
5
Monetary Value of Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALY) among Patients with Cardiovascular Disease: a Willingness to Pay Study (WTP).心血管疾病患者质量调整生命年(QALY)的货币价值:一项支付意愿研究(WTP)
Iran J Pharm Res. 2017 Spring;16(2):823-833.
6
A systematic review of studies eliciting willingness-to-pay per quality-adjusted life year: does it justify CE threshold?对获取每质量调整生命年支付意愿的研究进行的系统评价:这是否能证明成本效益阈值的合理性?
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 9;10(4):e0122760. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122760. eCollection 2015.
7
A Contingent Valuation Study for Eliciting a Monetary Value of a Quality-Adjusted Life-Year in the General Greek Population.对一般希腊人群体进行质量调整生命年货币价值的条件价值评估研究。
Value Health Reg Issues. 2020 Sep;22:36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2020.03.002. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
8
Willingness to pay for a quality-adjusted life-year: the individual perspective.对质量调整生命年的支付意愿:个体视角。
Value Health. 2010 Dec;13(8):1046-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2010.00781.x. Epub 2010 Sep 3.
9
Estimating the willingness to pay for a quality-adjusted life year in Thailand: does the context of health gain matter?估算泰国人对质量调整生命年的支付意愿:健康改善的背景是否重要?
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2013;5:29-36. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S38062. Epub 2013 Jan 9.
10
Estimating the range of incremental cost-effectiveness thresholds for healthcare based on willingness to pay and GDP per capita: A systematic review.基于支付意愿和人均 GDP 估算医疗保健增量成本效益阈值范围:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 14;17(4):e0266934. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266934. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review on the direct approach to elicit the demand-side cost-effectiveness threshold: Implications for low- and middle-income countries.一项关于直接 elicitation 需求方成本效益阈值的系统评价:对低收入和中等收入国家的启示。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 8;19(2):e0297450. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297450. eCollection 2024.
2
Estimation of the value of curative therapies in oncology: a willingness-to-pay study in China.肿瘤学中治愈性疗法价值的评估:一项在中国的支付意愿研究。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2023 Jun 5;21(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12962-023-00442-y.
3
Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of insulin aspart and glargine in type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus in Iran.门冬胰岛素和甘精胰岛素在伊朗1型和2型糖尿病治疗中的药物经济学评价
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2023 Apr 8;22(1):817-825. doi: 10.1007/s40200-023-01209-1. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
Determination of a cost-effectiveness threshold for cancer interventions in Iran.伊朗癌症干预措施成本效益阈值的确定。
Front Oncol. 2022 Dec 12;12:1039589. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1039589. eCollection 2022.
5
Economic evaluation of a national vitamin D supplementation program among Iranian adolescents for the prevention of adulthood type 2 diabetes mellitus.伊朗青少年国家维生素 D 补充计划的经济学评价:预防成年 2 型糖尿病。
BMC Complement Med Ther. 2022 Jan 3;22(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12906-021-03474-0.
6
Value of willingness to pay for a QALY gained in Iran; a modified chained-approach.伊朗获得每质量调整生命年的支付意愿价值:一种修正的连锁方法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Dec 14;21(1):1339. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07344-w.
7
Willingness to pay for a quality-adjusted life year: a systematic review with meta-regression.支付意愿以获得质量调整生命年:系统综述和荟萃回归分析。
Eur J Health Econ. 2022 Mar;23(2):277-299. doi: 10.1007/s10198-021-01364-3. Epub 2021 Aug 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Discounting in Economic Evaluations.经济性评价中的折扣
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Jul;36(7):745-758. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0672-z.
2
Monetary Value of Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALY) among Patients with Cardiovascular Disease: a Willingness to Pay Study (WTP).心血管疾病患者质量调整生命年(QALY)的货币价值:一项支付意愿研究(WTP)
Iran J Pharm Res. 2017 Spring;16(2):823-833.
3
Determination of Cost-Effectiveness Threshold For Malaysia.马来西亚成本效益阈值的确定。
Value Health. 2014 Nov;17(7):A438. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.08.1137. Epub 2014 Oct 26.
4
Population-Based Preference Weights for the EQ-5D Health States Using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) in Iran.伊朗使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)对EQ-5D健康状态进行的基于人群的偏好权重研究。
Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2016 Feb 13;18(2):e21584. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.21584. eCollection 2016 Feb.
5
A systematic review of studies eliciting willingness-to-pay per quality-adjusted life year: does it justify CE threshold?对获取每质量调整生命年支付意愿的研究进行的系统评价:这是否能证明成本效益阈值的合理性?
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 9;10(4):e0122760. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122760. eCollection 2015.
6
Stated time preferences for health: a systematic review and meta analysis of private and social discount rates.健康的既定时间偏好:对个人和社会贴现率的系统评价与荟萃分析
J Res Health Sci. 2014 Summer;14(3):181-6.
7
The Willingness to Pay for a Quality Adjusted Life Year: A Review of the Empirical Literature.支付意愿以获取质量调整生命年:实证文献综述。
Health Econ. 2015 Oct;24(10):1289-1301. doi: 10.1002/hec.3085. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
8
The value of a QALY: individual willingness to pay for health gains under risk.QALY 的价值:风险下个人对健康收益的支付意愿。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2014 Jan;32(1):75-86. doi: 10.1007/s40273-013-0110-1.
9
Time trade-off: one methodology, different methods.时间权衡:一种方法,多种方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2013 Jul;14 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S53-64. doi: 10.1007/s10198-013-0508-x.
10
Estimating a WTP-based value of a QALY: the 'chained' approach.基于意愿支付法估计 QALY 价值:“链式”方法。
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Sep;92:92-104. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.05.013. Epub 2013 Jun 4.

糖尿病患者中质量调整生命年的价值:一项使用支付意愿法的调查研究。

The Worth of a Quality-Adjusted Life-Year in Patients with Diabetes: An Investigation Study using a Willingness-to-Pay Method.

作者信息

Moradi Najme, Rashidian Arash, Nosratnejad Shirin, Olyaeemanesh Alireza, Zanganeh Marzieh, Zarei Leila

机构信息

Health Management and Economics Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Health Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Pharmacoecon Open. 2019 Sep;3(3):311-319. doi: 10.1007/s41669-018-0111-2.

DOI:10.1007/s41669-018-0111-2
PMID:30617954
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6710303/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A limited number of studies have specifically examined the value of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) from the patient's perspective.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to investigate the worth of QALYs from the perspectives of patients with diabetes using health and willingness-to-pay (WTP) measures.

METHODS

A hypothetical treatment characterized by a permanent cure was presented to 149 patients with diabetes in Tehran, Iran, to elicit the monetary value that they attach to QALYs. The QALY gains of the participants were determined using the EuroQol-5 Dimensions, 3 Levels instrument, the visual analogue scale, and the time trade-off method. A mixed closed-ended WTP model supported by an open-ended question was used to ascertain the monetary value of a QALY gained. Finally, we used each respondent's ratio of WTP to QALY gained and the mean of the ratios to estimate the worth of a QALY to all respondents.

RESULTS

In total, 96% of respondents were willing to pay out of pocket for the restoration of full health, whereas 4% exhibited a zero WTP because of an inability to pay. The mean WTP per QALY varied depending on the health measure and discount rate used, ranging from $US1191 to $US5043 in sensitivity analysis, which is equal to 0.23-0.95 of Iran's gross domestic product (GDP) per capita in 2015.

CONCLUSION

Applying the upper limit of the World Health Organization's (WHO) cost-effectiveness threshold (i.e., three times the local GDP per capita) in resource allocation decisions requires caution and investigation, particularly in low- and middle-income countries with limited healthcare resources. To generalize our findings, especially for application to decision making, additional surveys involving more representative samples from different settings are recommended.

摘要

背景

仅有少数研究专门从患者角度考察了质量调整生命年(QALYs)的价值。

目的

本研究的目的是使用健康和支付意愿(WTP)测量方法,从糖尿病患者的角度调查QALYs的价值。

方法

向伊朗德黑兰的149名糖尿病患者介绍了一种以永久治愈为特征的假设治疗方法,以引出他们赋予QALYs的货币价值。使用欧洲五维健康量表(EuroQol-5 Dimensions, 3 Levels instrument)、视觉模拟量表和时间权衡法确定参与者的QALY增益。采用由开放式问题支持的混合封闭式WTP模型来确定获得的一个QALY的货币价值。最后,我们使用每个受访者的WTP与获得的QALY的比率以及这些比率的平均值来估计对所有受访者而言一个QALY的价值。

结果

总体而言,96%的受访者愿意自掏腰包支付以恢复完全健康,而4%的受访者因无力支付而表现出零支付意愿。每个QALY的平均支付意愿因所使用的健康测量方法和贴现率而异,在敏感性分析中范围为1191美元至5043美元,这相当于2015年伊朗人均国内生产总值(GDP)的0.23 - 0.95。

结论

在资源分配决策中应用世界卫生组织(WHO)成本效益阈值的上限(即当地人均GDP的三倍)需要谨慎和调查,特别是在医疗资源有限的低收入和中等收入国家。为了推广我们的研究结果,特别是用于决策,建议进行更多涉及来自不同背景更具代表性样本的额外调查。