Department of Anthropology, Seoul National University, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Medical Education Center, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 16;16(12):e0260343. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260343. eCollection 2021.
Physicians and nurses working in acute care settings, such as tertiary hospitals, are involved in various stages of critical and terminal care, ranging from diagnosis of life-threatening diseases to care for the dying. It is well known that critical and terminal care causes moral distress to healthcare professionals. This study aimed to explore moral distress in critical and terminal care in acute hospital settings by analyzing the experiences of physicians and nurses from various departments. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted in two tertiary hospitals in South Korea. The collected data were analyzed using grounded theory. A total of 22 physicians and nurses who had experienced moral difficulties regarding critical and terminal care were recruited via purposive maximum variation sampling, and 21 reported moral distress. The following points were what participants believed to be right for the patients: minimizing meaningless interventions during the terminal stage, letting patients know of their poor prognosis, saving lives, offering palliative care, and providing care with compassion. However, family dominance, hierarchy, the clinical culture of avoiding the discussion of death, lack of support for the surviving patients, and intensive workload challenged what the participants were pursuing and frustrated them. As a result, the participants experienced stress, lack of enthusiasm, guilt, depression, and skepticism. This study revealed that healthcare professionals working in tertiary hospitals in South Korea experienced moral distress when taking care of critically and terminally ill patients, in similar ways to the medical staff working in other settings. On the other hand, the present study uniquely identified that the aspects of saving lives and the necessity of palliative care were reported as those valued by healthcare professionals. This study contributes to the literature by adding data collected from two tertiary hospitals in South Korea.
在急性护理环境(如三级医院)中工作的医生和护士参与了从危及生命疾病的诊断到临终关怀的各个阶段的危急和终末期护理。众所周知,危急和终末期护理会给医疗保健专业人员带来道德困境。本研究旨在通过分析来自不同科室的医生和护士的经验,探讨急性医院环境中的危急和终末期护理中的道德困境。在韩国的两家三级医院进行了半结构式深入访谈。使用扎根理论对收集的数据进行分析。通过目的性最大变异抽样,共招募了 22 名经历过危急和终末期护理道德困难的医生和护士,其中 21 名报告了道德困境。参与者认为对患者正确的是:在终末期尽量减少无意义的干预,让患者了解其预后不良,拯救生命,提供姑息治疗,以及富有同情心的护理。然而,家庭主导、等级制度、避免讨论死亡的临床文化、对幸存患者的支持不足以及繁重的工作量挑战了参与者的追求,并使他们感到沮丧。结果,参与者感到压力、缺乏热情、内疚、抑郁和怀疑。本研究表明,在韩国的三级医院工作的医疗保健专业人员在照顾危急和终末期患者时会经历道德困境,这与其他环境中的医务人员类似。另一方面,本研究还独特地发现,拯救生命和姑息治疗的必要性被报告为医疗保健专业人员所重视的方面。本研究通过增加来自韩国两家三级医院的资料为文献做出了贡献。