• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

RASE:在学术界中建模由于处于边缘群体地位而导致的累积劣势。

RASE: Modeling cumulative disadvantage due to marginalized group status in academia.

机构信息

Department of Physics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States of America.

Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Dec 16;16(12):e0260567. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260567. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0260567
PMID:34914741
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8675700/
Abstract

We propose a framework of Resources, Achievement, Status, and Events (RASE) that allows the many disparate but well-documented phenomena affecting underrepresented groups in STEM to be assembled into a story of career trajectories, illuminating the possible cumulative impact of many small inequities. Our framework contains a three-component deterministic cycle of (1) production of Achievements from Resources, (2) updated community Status due to Achievements, and (3) accrual of additional Resources based on community Status. A fourth component, stochastic Events, can influence an individual's level of Resources or Achievements at each time step of the cycle. We build a specific mathematical model within the RASE framework and use it to investigate the impact of accumulated disadvantages from multiple compounding variables. We demonstrate that the model can reproduce data of observed disparities in academia. Finally, we use a publicly available visualization and networking tool to provide a sandbox for exploring career outcomes within the model. The modeling exercise, results, and visualization tool may be useful in the context of training STEM faculty to recognize and reduce effects of bias.

摘要

我们提出了一个资源、成就、地位和事件(RASE)的框架,该框架可以将影响 STEM 领域代表性不足群体的许多不同但有充分记录的现象组合成一个职业轨迹的故事,阐明许多小的不平等可能产生的累积影响。我们的框架包含一个由(1)资源产生成就、(2)成就导致社区地位更新、(3)基于社区地位获得额外资源组成的三部分确定性循环。第四个组件,随机事件,可以在循环的每个时间步影响个人的资源或成就水平。我们在 RASE 框架内建立了一个特定的数学模型,并使用它来研究多个复合变量累积劣势的影响。我们证明该模型可以再现学术界观察到的差异数据。最后,我们使用一个公开的可视化和网络工具为模型内的职业结果提供一个沙盒。该建模练习、结果和可视化工具在培训 STEM 教师识别和减少偏见影响方面可能有用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/751d/8675700/4156fca81ef8/pone.0260567.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/751d/8675700/794328b83e84/pone.0260567.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/751d/8675700/8870a94ca2b5/pone.0260567.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/751d/8675700/a4ae9e1dc900/pone.0260567.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/751d/8675700/a4ea9dd202df/pone.0260567.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/751d/8675700/4156fca81ef8/pone.0260567.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/751d/8675700/794328b83e84/pone.0260567.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/751d/8675700/8870a94ca2b5/pone.0260567.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/751d/8675700/a4ae9e1dc900/pone.0260567.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/751d/8675700/a4ea9dd202df/pone.0260567.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/751d/8675700/4156fca81ef8/pone.0260567.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
RASE: Modeling cumulative disadvantage due to marginalized group status in academia.RASE:在学术界中建模由于处于边缘群体地位而导致的累积劣势。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 16;16(12):e0260567. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260567. eCollection 2021.
2
Utility-value intervention with parents increases students' STEM preparation and career pursuit.与家长一起进行的效用价值干预可提高学生在STEM领域的准备程度和职业追求。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jan 31;114(5):909-914. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1607386114. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
3
Preparing Students for Success in STEM: Role of Professional Societies.为 STEM 领域的成功做好学生准备:专业学会的作用。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2018 Sep;17(3):es14. doi: 10.1187/cbe.17-11-0243.
4
A Longitudinal Study of How Quality Mentorship and Research Experience Integrate Underrepresented Minorities into STEM Careers.一项关于质量导师制和研究经验如何将少数族裔融入 STEM 职业的纵向研究。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2018 Spring;17(1). doi: 10.1187/cbe.17-04-0066.
5
Advancing women in STEM: institutional transformation.推动女性在科学、技术、工程和数学领域的发展:机构转型。
Lancet. 2019 Feb 9;393(10171):e17-e18. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30206-5.
6
Australia's strategy to achieve gender equality in STEM.澳大利亚在科学、技术、工程和数学领域实现性别平等的战略。
Lancet. 2019 Feb 9;393(10171):524-526. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32109-3.
7
A Cultural Psychological Model of Cross-National Variation in Gender Gaps in STEM Participation.跨国家和地区科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)参与性别差距的文化心理模型。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2020 Nov;24(4):345-370. doi: 10.1177/1088868320947005. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
8
Think outside the lab.跳出实验室的局限思考。
Science. 2014 May 16;344(6185):672. doi: 10.1126/science.1255745.
9
Changing academic culture to improve undergraduate STEM education.改变学术文化,以改善本科 STEM 教育。
Trends Microbiol. 2014 Dec;22(12):657-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2014.09.006. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
10
Athena SWAN and ADVANCE: effectiveness and lessons learned.雅典娜天鹅计划与推进计划:成效与经验教训
Lancet. 2019 Feb 9;393(10171):604-608. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)33213-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Lessons learned from implementing a diversity, equity, and inclusion curriculum for health research professionals at a large academic research institution.在一所大型学术研究机构为健康研究专业人员实施多元化、公平性和包容性课程中获得的经验教训。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Jan 12;8(1):e22. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.6. eCollection 2024.
2
Little transparency and equity in scientific awards for early- and mid-career researchers in ecology and evolution.早期和中期生态与进化领域研究人员的科学奖项缺乏透明度和公平性。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2023 May;7(5):655-665. doi: 10.1038/s41559-023-02028-6. Epub 2023 Apr 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Unequal effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on scientists.新冠疫情对科学家的不平等影响。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Sep;4(9):880-883. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0921-y.
2
The extent and drivers of gender imbalance in neuroscience reference lists.神经科学参考文献中性别失衡的程度和驱动因素。
Nat Neurosci. 2020 Aug;23(8):918-926. doi: 10.1038/s41593-020-0658-y. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
3
Opinion: In the wake of COVID-19, academia needs new solutions to ensure gender equity.观点:在新冠疫情之后,学术界需要新的解决方案来确保性别平等。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jul 7;117(27):15378-15381. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2010636117. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
4
Effects of sexual harassment on advancement of women in academic medicine: A multi-institutional longitudinal study.性骚扰对学术医学领域女性职业发展的影响:一项多机构纵向研究。
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Mar 4;20:100298. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100298. eCollection 2020 Mar.
5
Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM.不专业的同行评审对科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)领域中代表性不足的群体造成了不成比例的伤害。
PeerJ. 2019 Dec 12;7:e8247. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8247. eCollection 2019.
6
Early coauthorship with top scientists predicts success in academic careers.与顶尖科学家的早期合作预示着学术生涯的成功。
Nat Commun. 2019 Nov 15;10(1):5170. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13130-4.
7
Gender similarities in the brain during mathematics development.数学能力发展过程中大脑的性别相似性。
NPJ Sci Learn. 2019 Nov 8;4:19. doi: 10.1038/s41539-019-0057-x. eCollection 2019.
8
Early-career setback and future career impact.早期职业挫折与未来职业影响。
Nat Commun. 2019 Oct 1;10(1):4331. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12189-3.
9
Comparison of National Institutes of Health Grant Amounts to First-Time Male and Female Principal Investigators.美国国立卫生研究院授予首次担任主要研究者的男性和女性的资助金额比较。
JAMA. 2019 Mar 5;321(9):898-900. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.21944.
10
Are gender gaps due to evaluations of the applicant or the science? A natural experiment at a national funding agency.性别差距是由于对申请人的评价还是科学本身造成的?来自一个国家资助机构的自然实验。
Lancet. 2019 Feb 9;393(10171):531-540. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32611-4.