Section of Conservative Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Oncol Res Treat. 2022;45(1-2):26-36. doi: 10.1159/000521499. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
Despite the advances that have been made to improve conventional chemotherapies, their use is limited by a narrow therapeutic window based on off-target toxicities. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are composed of an antibody and a toxic payload covalently coupled by a chemical linker. They constitute an elegant means to tackle the limitations of conventional chemotherapeutics by selectively delivering a highly toxic payload directly to target cells and thereby increasing efficacy of the delivered cytotoxic but at the same time limiting systemic exposure and toxicities. As such, they appear inspired by Paul Ehrlich's concept of a "magic bullet," which he envisioned as drugs that go directly to their target to attack pathogens but remain harmless in healthy tissues.
The concept of conjugating drugs to antibodies via chemical linkers is not new. As early as in the 1960s, researchers started to investigate such ADCs in animal models and first clinical trials based on mouse antibodies began in the 1980s. Although the concept appears relatively straightforward, ADCs are highly complex molecules, and it took several decades of research and development until the first ADC was approved by the FDA in 2000 and the second followed not until 11 years later. The development of an effective ADC is highly demanding, and each individual component of an ADC must be optimized: the target, the antibody, the linker, and its conjugation chemistry as well as the cytotoxic payload. Today, there are 9 approved ADCs overall and 3 for breast cancer. So, the pace of development seems to pick up with over 100 candidates in various stages of clinical development. Many ADCs of the newest generation are optimized to elicit a so-called bystander effect, to increase efficacy and tackle heterogeneous antigen expression. This approach requires a balancing of efficacy and systemic toxicity. Hence, ADCs based on their complex biology cause relevant toxicities, which are characteristic for each specific compound and may include hematologic toxicities, elevated transaminases, gastrointestinal events, and pneumonitis but also ocular toxicities as well as others many physicians may initially not be very familiar with. Management of the side effects will be key to the successful clinical use of these potent drugs. Key Messages: This review focusses on the clinical experience with ADCs approved in breast cancer as well as promising candidates in late-stage clinical development. We will discuss the mode of action, biology, and composition of ADCs and how each of these crucial components influences their properties and efficacy.
尽管在提高传统化疗方面已经取得了进展,但由于基于脱靶毒性的治疗窗口狭窄,其应用受到限制。抗体药物偶联物(ADC)由抗体和通过化学连接子共价偶联的毒性有效载荷组成。它们通过选择性地将高毒性有效载荷直接递送至靶细胞,从而提高所递送的细胞毒性药物的功效,同时限制全身暴露和毒性,构成了解决传统化疗剂局限性的一种巧妙手段。因此,它们似乎受到保罗·埃尔利希(Paul Ehrlich)的“魔弹”概念的启发,他设想这种药物可以直接靶向病原体,而在健康组织中保持无害。
通过化学连接子将药物偶联至抗体的概念并不新鲜。早在 20 世纪 60 年代,研究人员就开始在动物模型中研究此类 ADC,并于 20 世纪 80 年代开始进行基于鼠抗体的首次临床试验。尽管该概念看起来相对简单,但 ADC 是高度复杂的分子,需要经过几十年的研究和开发,直到 2000 年 FDA 批准首个 ADC,11 年后才批准第二个 ADC。开发有效的 ADC 要求很高,ADC 的每个单独成分都必须进行优化:靶标、抗体、连接子及其缀合化学以及细胞毒性有效载荷。如今,总体上有 9 种 ADC 获得批准,其中 3 种用于乳腺癌。因此,随着超过 100 种处于不同临床开发阶段的候选药物的出现,开发速度似乎正在加快。许多新一代 ADC 经过优化可产生所谓的旁观者效应,以提高功效并解决异质抗原表达问题。这种方法需要在功效和全身毒性之间取得平衡。因此,基于其复杂生物学的 ADC 会引起相关毒性,这些毒性是每种特定化合物的特征,可能包括血液学毒性、转氨酸升高、胃肠道事件和肺炎,但也包括眼部毒性以及许多医生最初可能不太熟悉的其他毒性。这些有效药物的成功临床应用的关键是对副作用的管理。
本综述重点介绍了已在乳腺癌中获得批准的 ADC 的临床经验以及后期临床开发中很有前途的候选药物。我们将讨论 ADC 的作用模式、生物学和组成,以及这些关键成分中的每一个如何影响它们的性质和功效。