• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

度普利尤单抗治疗鼻息肉的不良反应:FDA 不良事件报告系统分析。

Dupilumab Adverse Events in Nasal Polyp Treatment: Analysis of FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.

机构信息

University of California, Riverside School of Medicine, Riverside, California, U.S.A.

Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.

出版信息

Laryngoscope. 2022 Dec;132(12):2307-2313. doi: 10.1002/lary.29992. Epub 2021 Dec 16.

DOI:10.1002/lary.29992
PMID:34918342
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Dupilumab was the first biologic approved to treat chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). While the risk of adverse events in phase-III clinical trials was low, dupilumab-associated adverse reactions (DAR) with real-world use is unknown and potentially under-reported. We aimed to evaluate DAR for CRSwNP treatment (CRSwNP-tx) using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective database study.

METHODS

FAERS was queried for DAR from 2019Q1 to 2021Q2. Individual DAR (iDAR) were categorized and quantitatively compared between treatment groups (CRSwNP, asthma, atopic dermatitis). Zero-truncated Poisson regression was modeled to predict the number of iDAR, and logistic regression was modeled to predict serious DARs.

RESULTS

There were 15,411 DAR observations; 911 for CRSwNP-tx, of which 121 (13.3%) had serious reactions and 3 died. Common CRSwNP-tx iDAR were dermatologic (13.9%), generalized (13.3%), and injection-site (10.8%) symptoms. The number of CRSwNP-tx iDAR was 2.99 [2.81, 3.17], compared to 3.44 [3.32, 3.56] for asthma and 3.18 [3.13, 3.24] for atopic dermatitis (Kruskal-Wallis test, P < .001). For CRSwNP-tx, iDAR reported-risk-ratio was 0.84 [0.77, 0.92] among men and 1.12 [1.04, 1.22] among older adults (>50). Serious DAR reported-odds-ratio was 1.37 [0.91, 2.04] among men and 1.39 [0.93, 2.08] among older adults.

CONCLUSIONS

While there are limitations with FAERS, this analysis suggests CRSwNP-tx is associated with fewer iDAR compared with other treatment indications. More iDAR are experienced among women and older adults, but men tend to have more serious DAR.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 132:2307-2313, 2022.

摘要

目的

度普利尤单抗是第一种获批治疗伴有鼻息肉的慢性鼻-鼻窦炎(CRSwNP)的生物制剂。尽管 III 期临床试验中的不良事件风险较低,但在真实世界应用中,度普利尤单抗相关不良反应(DAR)尚不清楚,且可能报告不足。我们旨在使用 FDA 不良事件报告系统(FAERS)评估 DAR 用于 CRSwNP 治疗(CRSwNP-tx)的情况。

研究设计

回顾性数据库研究。

方法

在 2019Q1 至 2021Q2 期间,从 FAERS 中查询 DAR。将个体不良事件报告(iDAR)分类,并在治疗组(CRSwNP、哮喘、特应性皮炎)之间进行定量比较。采用零截断泊松回归模型预测 iDAR 的数量,采用逻辑回归模型预测严重 DAR。

结果

共观察到 15411 例 DAR 报告;其中 911 例为 CRSwNP-tx,其中 121 例(13.3%)出现严重反应,3 例死亡。CRSwNP-tx 常见的 iDAR 为皮肤病学(13.9%)、全身性(13.3%)和注射部位(10.8%)症状。与哮喘(3.44 [3.32,3.56])和特应性皮炎(3.18 [3.13,3.24])相比,CRSwNP-tx 的 iDAR 数量为 2.99 [2.81,3.17](Kruskal-Wallis 检验,P<0.001)。在 CRSwNP-tx 中,男性的 iDAR 报告风险比为 0.84 [0.77,0.92],而老年患者(>50 岁)的 iDAR 报告风险比为 1.12 [1.04,1.22]。男性严重 DAR 的报告比值比为 1.37 [0.91,2.04],而老年患者的报告比值比为 1.39 [0.93,2.08]。

结论

尽管 FAERS 存在一定的局限性,但该分析表明,与其他治疗适应证相比,CRSwNP-tx 相关的 iDAR 较少。女性和老年患者的 iDAR 更多,但男性更容易出现严重的 DAR。

证据等级

3 级喉镜,132:2307-2313,2022。

相似文献

1
Dupilumab Adverse Events in Nasal Polyp Treatment: Analysis of FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.度普利尤单抗治疗鼻息肉的不良反应:FDA 不良事件报告系统分析。
Laryngoscope. 2022 Dec;132(12):2307-2313. doi: 10.1002/lary.29992. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
2
Ocular Surface Adverse Events are not Associated with Dupilumab use in Nasal Polyp Treatment.眼部表面不良反应与治疗鼻息肉时使用度普利尤单抗无关。
Laryngoscope. 2024 Jun;134(6):2602-2608. doi: 10.1002/lary.31205. Epub 2023 Dec 1.
3
Dupilumab-induced skin-associated side effects in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis.度普利尤单抗治疗慢性鼻-鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉患者引起的皮肤相关不良反应。
J Dermatol. 2023 Jan;50(1):89-93. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.16595. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
4
Efficacy and safety of dupilumab in patients with severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (LIBERTY NP SINUS-24 and LIBERTY NP SINUS-52): results from two multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group phase 3 trials.度普利尤单抗治疗伴有鼻息肉的重度慢性鼻-鼻窦炎患者的疗效和安全性(LIBERTY NP SINUS-24 和 LIBERTY NP SINUS-52):两项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行分组 3 期临床试验的结果。
Lancet. 2019 Nov 2;394(10209):1638-1650. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31881-1. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
5
Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab Versus Omalizumab in Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps and Asthma: EVEREST Trial Design.度普利尤单抗对比奥马珠单抗治疗伴有鼻息肉的慢性鼻-鼻窦炎和哮喘的疗效和安全性:EVEREST 试验设计。
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2022 Nov;36(6):788-795. doi: 10.1177/19458924221112211. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
6
Effect of Dupilumab on Blood Eosinophil Counts in Patients With Asthma, Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps, Atopic Dermatitis, or Eosinophilic Esophagitis.度普利尤单抗对哮喘、伴鼻息肉的慢性鼻-鼻窦炎、特应性皮炎或嗜酸性食管炎患者血液嗜酸性粒细胞计数的影响。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2022 Oct;10(10):2695-2709. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2022.05.019. Epub 2022 May 28.
7
Real-World Adverse Events After Type 2 Biologic use in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps.2 型生物制剂治疗慢性鼻-鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉的真实世界不良事件。
Laryngoscope. 2024 Jul;134(7):3054-3059. doi: 10.1002/lary.31305. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
8
Efficacy and safety of dupilumab in patients with uncontrolled severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and a clinical diagnosis of NSAID-ERD: Results from two randomized placebo-controlled phase 3 trials.度普利尤单抗治疗未得到控制的伴有鼻息肉的重度慢性鼻-鼻窦炎和 NSAID-ERD 临床诊断患者的疗效和安全性:两项随机安慰剂对照 3 期临床试验的结果。
Allergy. 2022 Apr;77(4):1231-1244. doi: 10.1111/all.15067. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
9
Respiratory Infections and Anti-Infective Medication Use From Phase 3 Dupilumab Respiratory Studies.度普利尤单抗治疗呼吸系统疾病3期研究中的呼吸道感染及抗感染药物使用情况
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2022 Mar;10(3):732-741. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.12.006. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
10
Conjunctivitis in dupilumab clinical trials.临床试验中的结膜炎。
Br J Dermatol. 2019 Sep;181(3):459-473. doi: 10.1111/bjd.17869. Epub 2019 May 7.

引用本文的文献

1
The advance on pathophysiological mechanisms of type 2 chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis.2型慢性鼻-鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉病理生理机制的研究进展
Front Allergy. 2025 Jul 2;6:1599797. doi: 10.3389/falgy.2025.1599797. eCollection 2025.
2
Chinese Position Paper on Biologic Therapy for Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps.《中国鼻息肉慢性鼻窦炎生物治疗立场文件》
Allergy. 2025 May;80(5):1208-1225. doi: 10.1111/all.16519. Epub 2025 Mar 5.
3
Efficacy and Safety of Biologics for Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps: A Meta-Analysis of Real-World Evidence.
生物制剂治疗伴鼻息肉慢性鼻-鼻窦炎的疗效与安全性:真实世界证据的Meta分析
Allergy. 2025 May;80(5):1256-1270. doi: 10.1111/all.16499. Epub 2025 Feb 22.
4
The Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis.慢性鼻-鼻窦炎的诊断与治疗
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2024 Sep 20;121(19):643-653. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2024.0167.
5
Biologic Therapies across Nasal Polyp Subtypes.跨鼻息肉亚型的生物疗法。
J Pers Med. 2024 Apr 19;14(4):432. doi: 10.3390/jpm14040432.
6
Characterizing Adverse Events of Biologic Treatment of T2 Disease: A Disproportionality Analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.T2 疾病生物治疗不良事件特征分析:FDA 不良事件报告系统的比例失调分析。
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2023;85(6):329-339. doi: 10.1159/000534545. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
7
Safety of triazole antifungals: a pharmacovigilance study from 2004 to 2021 based on FAERS.三唑类抗真菌药物的安全性:一项基于美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)的2004年至2021年药物警戒研究。
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2022 Dec 16;13:20420986221143266. doi: 10.1177/20420986221143266. eCollection 2022.
8
Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps management in the biologic therapy era: an international YO-IFOS survey.生物治疗时代慢性鼻-鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉的管理:一项国际YO-IFOS调查
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 May;280(5):2309-2316. doi: 10.1007/s00405-022-07762-4. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
9
Dupilumab-induced skin-associated side effects in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis.度普利尤单抗治疗慢性鼻-鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉患者引起的皮肤相关不良反应。
J Dermatol. 2023 Jan;50(1):89-93. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.16595. Epub 2022 Sep 30.