Suppr超能文献

使用粪便自动分析仪的全过滤法与三种手工粪便检查方法的比较。

Comparison of the complete filtration method using an automated feces analyzer with three manual methods for stool examinations.

机构信息

Clinical Microscopy Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.

Clinical Chemistry Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.

出版信息

J Microbiol Methods. 2022 Jan;192:106394. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2021.106394. Epub 2021 Dec 14.

Abstract

Conventional diagnostic techniques using manual methods for stool examination have important limitations. Hence there is a need for improved technologies in routine clinical practice. This study aimed to compare detection rates, agreements, and diagnostic performances for stool examinations in all parameters of the complete filtration method using the Sciendox Feces Analysis System-50 automated feces analyzer with three manual methods, the direct smear, Kato's thick smear, and formalin ethyl concentration techniques. The 252 routine stool samples were examined for parasites, white blood cells (WBCs), red blood cells (RBCs), fat globules, and yeast cells using the four methods indicated above, and the complete filtration detection rates, Cohen's kappa (κ), and diagnostic performances were evaluated and compared. The detection rates of RBCs, fat globules, and yeast cells examined by the complete filtration automated method were comparable to the manual methods, but the detection rates of parasites and WBCs were significantly lower. Most methods detected the same seven parasite species, Ascaris lumbricoides, hookworm, Trichuris trichiura, Strongyloides stercoralis, Entamoeba histolytica/dispar, Blastocystis spp., and Giardia intestinalis. Pairwise agreements between the complete filtration and other methods were good to very good for all parameters showing κ values of 0.74 to 0.89. The diagnostic performances against the combined results showed complete filtration method sensitivities of 70%, 81.82%, 77.27%, 100%, and 95% for parasites, WBCs, RBCs, fat globules, and yeast cells, respectively, while the complete filtration negative predictive values (NPVs) and accuracies showed higher than 95% for all parameters. The complete filtration method using the automated feces analyzer showed high NPVs and accuracies, and good agreements with the three tested manual methods for stool examination in all parameters.

摘要

传统的粪便检查方法采用手动方法存在重要的局限性。因此,需要在常规临床实践中改进技术。本研究旨在比较使用 Sciendox 粪便分析系统-50 自动粪便分析仪的全过滤法与三种手动方法(直接涂片、加藤厚涂片和甲醛乙基浓缩技术)在所有参数下检测粪便的检出率、一致性和诊断性能。使用上述四种方法检查了 252 例常规粪便样本,以检测寄生虫、白细胞(WBC)、红细胞(RBC)、脂肪球和酵母细胞,并评估和比较了全过滤检测率、Cohen's kappa(κ)和诊断性能。全过滤自动化方法检测 RBC、脂肪球和酵母细胞的检出率与手动方法相当,但寄生虫和 WBC 的检出率明显较低。大多数方法检测到相同的七种寄生虫,即蛔虫、钩虫、鞭虫、粪类圆线虫、溶组织内阿米巴/迪斯帕拉、蓝氏贾第鞭毛虫和肠道贾第虫。全过滤与其他方法之间的各项参数的两两一致性较好至非常好,κ 值为 0.74 至 0.89。与组合结果相比,全过滤方法对寄生虫、WBC、RBC、脂肪球和酵母细胞的敏感性分别为 70%、81.82%、77.27%、100%和 95%,而全过滤方法的阴性预测值(NPV)和准确性均显示出所有参数的 NPV 和准确性均高于 95%。使用自动粪便分析仪的全过滤方法显示出高的 NPV 和准确性,并且与三种测试的手动方法在所有参数下具有良好的一致性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验