Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md; Vascular Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Baltimore, Md.
Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md.
J Vasc Surg. 2022 May;75(5):1643-1650. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.11.061. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
Asymptomatic carotid atherosclerotic stenosis (ACAS) is associated with cognitive impairment. Systemic inflammation occurs in patients with systemic atherosclerosis and is also associated with cognitive impairment. The goal of this study was to determine if cognitive impairment in patients with ACAS is the result of systemic inflammation.
A cross-sectional analysis of 104 patients (63 patients with ACAS, 41 controls) with cognitive function and inflammatory biomarker assessments was performed. Venous blood was assayed for proinflammatory biomarkers (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-6R, IL-8, IL-17, tumor necrosis factor-α, matrix metalloproteinase [MMP]-1, MMP-2, MMP-7, MMP-9, vascular cell adhesion molecule, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein). The patients also underwent comprehensive cognitive testing to compute five domain-specific cognitive scores per patient. We first assessed the associations between carotid stenosis and cognitive function, and between carotid stenosis and systemic inflammation in separate regression models. We then determined whether cognitive impairments persisted in patients with carotid stenosis after accounting for inflammation by adjusting for inflammatory biomarker levels in a combined model.
Patients with ACAS and control patients differed in age, race, coronary artery disease prevalence, and education. Stenosis patients had worse cognitive scores in two domains: learning and memory (P = .05) and motor and processing speed (P = .002). Despite adjusting for inflammatory biomarker levels, patients with ACAS still demonstrated deficits in the domains of learning and memory and motor and processing speed.
Although systemic atherosclerosis-induced inflammation is a well-recognized cause for cognitive impairment, our data suggest that it is not the primary underlying mechanism behind cognitive impairments seen in ACAS. Cognitive impairments in learning and memory and motor and processing speed seen in patients with ACAS persist after adjusting for systemic inflammation. Thus, alternative mechanisms should be explored to account for the observed functional impairments.
无症状颈动脉粥样硬化性狭窄(ACAS)与认知障碍有关。全身性动脉粥样硬化患者会出现全身炎症,且该炎症与认知障碍相关。本研究旨在确定 ACAS 患者的认知障碍是否是全身性炎症的结果。
对 104 名(63 名 ACAS 患者,41 名对照者)认知功能和炎症生物标志物评估患者进行了横断面分析。静脉血检测促炎生物标志物(IL-1β、IL-6、IL-6R、IL-8、IL-17、肿瘤坏死因子-α、基质金属蛋白酶[MMP]-1、MMP-2、MMP-7、MMP-9、血管细胞黏附分子和高敏 C 反应蛋白)。患者还接受了全面的认知测试,以计算每位患者五个特定领域的认知评分。我们首先分别在回归模型中评估颈动脉狭窄与认知功能之间的关联,以及颈动脉狭窄与全身炎症之间的关联。然后,我们通过调整炎症生物标志物水平,在综合模型中评估了炎症对认知障碍的影响,确定在考虑炎症后,颈动脉狭窄患者的认知障碍是否仍然存在。
ACAS 患者和对照患者在年龄、种族、冠心病患病率和教育程度方面存在差异。狭窄患者在学习和记忆(P =.05)和运动和处理速度(P =.002)两个领域的认知评分更差。尽管调整了炎症生物标志物水平,ACAS 患者在学习和记忆以及运动和处理速度领域仍存在认知障碍。
尽管系统性动脉粥样硬化引起的炎症是认知障碍的公认原因,但我们的数据表明,它不是 ACAS 患者认知障碍的主要潜在机制。在调整全身炎症后,ACAS 患者在学习和记忆以及运动和处理速度方面的认知障碍仍然存在。因此,应该探索替代机制来解释观察到的功能障碍。