Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Department of Head & Neck Surgery and Oncology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kochi, Kerala, India.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022 Mar;75(3):980-990. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.11.061. Epub 2021 Nov 27.
Bilateral hand amputation (BHA) is a life-changing event that can result in a great degree of loss of function. Prosthetic limb replacement and composite tissue allotransplantation are the treatment options. Understanding the BHA in terms of economic utility will help direct future research and upgrading in healthcare delivery. This is a cross-sectional study in 32 BHA who have completed a minimum of six months after wound healing. The primary objective was to assess the convergent validity of three different health utility (HU) derivation methods, namely the time trade-off (TTO), EuroQol questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L), and EuroQol visual analog scale (EQ-VAS) among BHA. The secondary objective was to correlate the disabilities of arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) scores with the HU scores and see whether the DASH score predicts the HU scores derived by different methods. The mean (SD) HU scores for TTO, VAS, and EQ-5D-5L were 0.34 (0.25), 0.61 (0.25), and 0.46 (0.20), respectively. HU derived by the TTO method displayed a weak correlation with EuroQol-based derivatives (EQ-VAS & EQ-5D-5L). But there was a moderate correlation between values by EQ-VAS & EQ-5D-5L. Hence, the EuroQol HU derivative is preferable to TTO. The mean (SD) of the DASH score was 48.4 (22.9). There was a strong correlation between the DASH scores and HU derived by different methods. Also, the DASH score is seen to be a good predictor of HU scores. This study is the first to derive HU and correlate the DASH with HU scores in the BHA scenario .
双侧手部截肢(BHA)是改变生活的事件,可导致功能丧失程度较大。假肢替代和复合组织同种异体移植是治疗选择。从经济效用的角度了解 BHA 将有助于指导未来的医疗保健提供的研究和升级。这是一项横断面研究,涉及 32 名手部截肢患者,这些患者在伤口愈合后至少完成了 6 个月的治疗。主要目的是评估三种不同健康效用(HU)推导方法(即时间权衡法(TTO)、EuroQol 问卷(EQ-5D-5L)和 EuroQol 视觉模拟量表(EQ-VAS)在 BHA 中的收敛效度。次要目的是分析手臂、肩部和手部残疾量表(DASH)评分与 HU 评分的相关性,以及 DASH 评分是否可以预测不同方法推导的 HU 评分。TTO、VAS 和 EQ-5D-5L 的平均(SD)HU 评分为 0.34(0.25)、0.61(0.25)和 0.46(0.20)。TTO 法推导的 HU 与基于 EuroQol 的衍生方法(EQ-VAS 和 EQ-5D-5L)相关性较弱。但是 EQ-VAS 和 EQ-5D-5L 之间的相关性中等。因此,EuroQol HU 衍生方法更可取。DASH 评分的平均值(SD)为 48.4(22.9)。DASH 评分与不同方法推导的 HU 之间存在强相关性。此外,DASH 评分是 HU 评分的良好预测指标。这项研究首次在 BHA 情况下推导 HU 并将 DASH 与 HU 评分相关联。