da Conceição Teixeira Liliana, Blacker Danielle, Campos Carlos, Garrett Carolina, Duport Sophie, Rocha Nuno Barbosa
Center for Innovative Care and Health Technology, School of Health Sciences, Polytechnic of Leiria, Leiria, Portugal.
Center for Rehabilitation Research, School of Health, Polytechnic Institute of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Dec 1;15:728637. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.728637. eCollection 2021.
The recommended way to assess consciousness in prolonged disorders of consciousness is to observe the patient's responses to sensory stimulation. Multiple assessment sessions have to be completed in order to reach a correct diagnosis. There is, however, a lack of data on how many sessions are sufficient for validity and reliability. The aim of this study was to identify the number of Sensory Modality Assessment and Rehabilitation Technique (SMART) assessment sessions needed to reach a reliable diagnosis. A secondary objective was to identify which sensory stimulation modalities are more useful to reach a diagnosis. A retrospective analysis of all the adult patients (who received a SMART assessment) admitted to a specialist brain injury unit over the course of 4 years was conducted ( = 35). An independent rater analyzed the SMART levels for each modality and session and provided a suggestive diagnosis based on the highest SMART level per session. For the vast majority of patients between 5 and 6 sessions was sufficient to reach the final clinical diagnosis. The visual, auditory, tactile, and motor function modalities were found to be more associated with the final diagnosis than the olfactory and gustatory modalities. These findings provide for the first time a rationale for optimizing the time spent on assessing patients using SMART.
评估长期意识障碍患者意识状态的推荐方法是观察患者对感觉刺激的反应。为了得出正确诊断,必须完成多次评估。然而,关于多少次评估足以保证有效性和可靠性的数据却很缺乏。本研究的目的是确定达到可靠诊断所需的感觉模态评估与康复技术(SMART)评估次数。第二个目标是确定哪些感觉刺激模态对诊断更有用。对一家专业脑损伤病房4年内收治的所有接受SMART评估的成年患者(n = 35)进行了回顾性分析。一名独立评估者分析了每个模态和每次评估的SMART水平,并根据每次评估的最高SMART水平给出初步诊断。对于绝大多数患者来说,5至6次评估足以得出最终临床诊断。研究发现,视觉、听觉、触觉和运动功能模态比嗅觉和味觉模态与最终诊断的关联更大。这些发现首次为优化使用SMART评估患者的时间提供了理论依据。