• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与初产妇、足月、单胎、头位剖宫产分娩的产科护理共识指南达成相关的因素。

Factors Associated with Meeting Obstetric Care Consensus Guidelines for Nulliparous, Term, Singleton, Vertex Cesarean Births.

作者信息

Wang Tiffany, Brown Inga, Huang Jim, Kawakita Tetsuya, Moxley Michael

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, District of Columbia.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Virginia Hospital Center, Arlington, Virginia.

出版信息

AJP Rep. 2021 Dec 15;11(4):e142-e146. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1740563. eCollection 2021 Oct.

DOI:10.1055/s-0041-1740563
PMID:34925955
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8674087/
Abstract

This study aimed to identify factors associated with meeting the Obstetric Care Consensus (OCC) guidelines for nulliparous, term, singleton, and vertex (NTSV) cesarean births.  This was a retrospective case control study of women with NTSV cesarean births between January 2014 and December 2017 at single tertiary care center. Demographics and clinical characteristics were compared between women with NTSV cesarean births which did or did not meet OCC guidelines. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to evaluate the effect of each variable on the odds of meeting OCC guidelines.  There were 1,834 women with NTSV cesarean births of which 744 (40.6%) met OCC guidelines for delivery and 1,090 (59.4%) did not. After controlling for confounding factors, the odds of meeting OCC guidelines were increased for in-house providers managing with residents (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.03, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.44-2.87) and without residents (aOR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.30-2.12), compared with non-in-house providers managing without residents. There was no significant difference in the odds of meeting OCC guidelines for in-house providers managing with or without residents (aOR = 1.23, 95% CI: 0.84-1.79).  After adjusting for confounding factors, in-house provider coverage, regardless of resident involvement, is associated with increased odds of NTSV cesarean births meeting OCC guidelines. Frequency of adherence to OCC guidelines for NTSV cesarean births was 40.6%.Neither patient demographics nor comorbidities was associated with the odds of meeting OCC guidelines.In-house providers are associated with increased odds of meeting OCC guidelines.

摘要

本研究旨在确定与符合未产妇、足月、单胎及头位(NTSV)剖宫产的产科护理共识(OCC)指南相关的因素。 这是一项对2014年1月至2017年12月期间在单一三级医疗中心进行NTSV剖宫产的女性进行的回顾性病例对照研究。比较了符合或不符合OCC指南的NTSV剖宫产女性的人口统计学和临床特征。使用多变量逻辑回归模型评估每个变量对符合OCC指南几率的影响。 共有1834名进行NTSV剖宫产的女性,其中744名(40.6%)符合分娩的OCC指南,1090名(59.4%)不符合。在控制混杂因素后,与不由住院医师协助的非院内医疗人员相比,由住院医师协助的院内医疗人员(调整后的优势比[aOR]=2.03,95%置信区间[CI]:1.44-2.87)和不由住院医师协助的院内医疗人员(aOR=1.66,95%CI:1.30-2.12)符合OCC指南的几率增加。对于由住院医师协助或不由住院医师协助的院内医疗人员,符合OCC指南的几率没有显著差异(aOR=1.23,95%CI:0.84-1.79)。 在调整混杂因素后,无论住院医师是否参与,院内医疗人员的覆盖与NTSV剖宫产符合OCC指南的几率增加相关。NTSV剖宫产符合OCC指南的频率为40.6%。患者的人口统计学特征和合并症均与符合OCC指南的几率无关。院内医疗人员与符合OCC指南的几率增加相关。

相似文献

1
Factors Associated with Meeting Obstetric Care Consensus Guidelines for Nulliparous, Term, Singleton, Vertex Cesarean Births.与初产妇、足月、单胎、头位剖宫产分娩的产科护理共识指南达成相关的因素。
AJP Rep. 2021 Dec 15;11(4):e142-e146. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1740563. eCollection 2021 Oct.
2
Hospital Quality Improvement Interventions, Statewide Policy Initiatives, and Rates of Cesarean Delivery for Nulliparous, Term, Singleton, Vertex Births in California.加利福尼亚州初产妇、足月、单胎、头位剖宫产率的医院质量改进干预措施、全州政策倡议
JAMA. 2021 Apr 27;325(16):1631-1639. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.3816.
3
Is there a useful cesarean birth measure? Assessment of the nulliparous term singleton vertex cesarean birth rate as a tool for obstetric quality improvement.是否存在有用的剖宫产衡量指标?评估初产妇足月单胎头位剖宫产率作为改善产科质量的工具。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jun;194(6):1644-51; discussion 1651-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.03.013. Epub 2006 Apr 27.
4
Do provider birth attitudes influence cesarean delivery rate: a cross-sectional study.医生的分娩态度是否会影响剖宫产率:一项横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 May 29;18(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1756-7.
5
Differences in Cesarean Rates for Nulliparous, Term, Singleton, Vertex Births Among Racial and Ethnic Groups and States Before and After Stay-at-Home Orders During the COVID-19 Pandemic, United States, 2017-2021.在 COVID-19 大流行期间实施居家令前后,美国 2017-2021 年间,不同种族和民族群体及各州初产妇、足月、单胎、头位分娩的剖宫产率差异。
Public Health Rep. 2024 Sep-Oct;139(5):615-625. doi: 10.1177/00333549241236629. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
6
Association of Maternal Comorbidity Burden With Cesarean Birth Rate Among Nulliparous, Term, Singleton, Vertex Pregnancies.母亲合并症负担与初产妇、足月、单胎、头位妊娠剖宫产率的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Oct 2;6(10):e2338604. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.38604.
7
Population risk factors for nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex caesarean birth: a national cross-sectional study.多产妇、足月、单胎、头位剖宫产的人群风险因素:一项全国性的横断面研究。
BJOG. 2021 Aug;128(9):1456-1463. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16684. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
8
Impact of cesarean delivery due to maternal choice on perinatal outcome in term nulliparous patients with a singleton fetus in a vertex presentation.因产妇选择行剖宫产术对足月、初产、头位单胎妊娠围产结局的影响。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Nov;35(21):4156-4161. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1847078. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
9
Assessing hospital differences in low-risk cesarean delivery metrics in Florida.评估佛罗里达州低风险剖宫产指标的医院差异。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Dec;229(6):684.e1-684.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.06.016. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
10
Quality Improvement Initiatives Lead to Reduction in Nulliparous Term Singleton Vertex Cesarean Delivery Rate.质量改进措施导致初产妇足月单胎头位剖宫产率降低。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2017 Feb;43(2):53-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2016.11.008. Epub 2016 Nov 15.

引用本文的文献

1
To evaluate rising caesarean section rate and factors contributing to it by using Modified Robson's Criteria at a tertiary care hospital.在一家三级护理医院,采用改良罗布森标准评估剖宫产率上升情况及其影响因素。
Pak J Med Sci. 2022 Sep-Oct;38(7):2021-2025. doi: 10.12669/pjms.38.7.5983.

本文引用的文献

1
The Influence of Academic Hospitalists on Labor and Delivery Outcomes.论学术型主治医生对分娩结局的影响。
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2020;85(4):352-356. doi: 10.1159/000508246. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
2
Births: Final Data for 2016.出生情况:2016年最终数据。
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2018 Jan;67(1):1-55.
3
Variation in the Nulliparous, Term, Singleton, Vertex Cesarean Delivery Rate.初产妇、足月、单胎、头位剖宫产率的变化。
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jun;131(6):1039-1048. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002636.
4
Evaluating the impact of the laborist model of obstetric care on maternal and neonatal outcomes.评估产科护理的劳动主义模式对孕产妇和新生儿结局的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Dec;215(6):770.e1-770.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.08.007. Epub 2016 Aug 13.
5
Impact of Obstetrician/Gynecologist Hospitalists on Quality of Obstetric Care (Cesarean Delivery Rates, Trial of Labor After Cesarean/Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Rates, and Neonatal Adverse Events).妇产科住院医师对产科护理质量的影响(剖宫产率、剖宫产术后阴道试产/剖宫产术后阴道分娩率及新生儿不良事件)
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2015 Sep;42(3):477-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2015.05.006.
6
Do laborists improve delivery outcomes for laboring women in California community hospitals?在加利福尼亚州的社区医院中,产科医生是否能改善产妇分娩的结局?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Oct;213(4):587.e1-587.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.051. Epub 2015 May 28.
7
Prevention of the first cesarean delivery.首次剖宫产的预防
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2015 Jun;42(2):377-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2015.01.010. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
8
Two practice models in one labor and delivery unit: association with cesarean delivery rates.一个产房的两种实践模式:与剖宫产率的关联
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Apr;212(4):491.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.11.014. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
9
Trends in low-risk cesarean delivery in the United States, 1990-2013.1990 - 2013年美国低风险剖宫产趋势
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2014 Nov 5;63(6):1-16.
10
Obstetric care consensus no. 1: safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery.产科保健共识 1:安全预防初次剖宫产。
Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Mar;123(3):693-711. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000444441.04111.1d.