• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初产妇、足月、单胎、头位剖宫产率的变化。

Variation in the Nulliparous, Term, Singleton, Vertex Cesarean Delivery Rate.

机构信息

Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois; MetroHealth Medical Center-Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio; Columbia University, New York, New York; the University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah; the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio; the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas; Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan; Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School-Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, Texas; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; the George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC; and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jun;131(6):1039-1048. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002636.

DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000002636
PMID:29742665
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6033063/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the contributions of patient and health care provider-hospital characteristics to the variation in the frequency of nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex cesarean delivery in a multi-institutional U.S. cohort.

METHODS

We performed a secondary analysis of the multicenter Assessment of Perinatal Excellence cohort of 115,502 mother and neonatal pairs who were delivered at 25 hospitals between March 2008 and February 2011. Women met inclusion criteria if they were nulliparous and delivered a singleton in vertex presentation at term. Hospital ranks for nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex cesarean delivery frequency were determined after risk adjustment. The fraction of variation in nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex cesarean delivery frequency attributable to patient and health care provider-hospital characteristics was assessed using hierarchical logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of the 115,502 deliveries in the initial cohort, 38,275 nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex deliveries met inclusion criteria. The median hospital nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex cesarean delivery frequency was 25.3% with a range from 15.0% to 35.2%. The majority of hospitals (16/25) changed rank quintiles after risk adjustment; overall the changes in rank were not statistically significant (P=.53). Patient characteristics accounted for 24% of the nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex cesarean delivery variation. The analyzed health care provider-hospital characteristics were not significantly associated with cesarean delivery frequency.

CONCLUSION

Although patient characteristics accounted for some of the variation in nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex cesarean delivery frequency and accounting for case mix had implications for hospital cesarean delivery rankings, the majority of the variation was not explained by the characteristics evaluated. These findings emphasize the importance of continued efforts to understand aspects of obstetric care, including case mix, that contribute to cesarean delivery variation.

摘要

目的

评估患者和医疗保健提供者-医院特征对美国多机构队列中初产妇、足月、单胎、头位剖宫产频率的变化的影响。

方法

我们对 2008 年 3 月至 2011 年 2 月期间在 25 家医院分娩的 115502 对母婴对进行了多中心卓越围产期评估队列的二次分析。符合纳入标准的产妇为初产妇且分娩足月、头位、单胎。在风险调整后确定初产妇、足月、单胎、头位剖宫产频率的医院等级。使用分层逻辑回归评估患者和医疗保健提供者-医院特征对初产妇、足月、单胎、头位剖宫产频率变化的贡献比例。

结果

在最初的队列中,有 115502 例分娩,其中 38275 例为初产妇、足月、单胎、头位分娩,符合纳入标准。中位数医院初产妇、足月、单胎、头位剖宫产频率为 25.3%,范围为 15.0%至 35.2%。大多数医院(25 家医院中的 16 家)在风险调整后改变了等级五分位数;总体而言,等级变化没有统计学意义(P=0.53)。患者特征占初产妇、足月、单胎、头位剖宫产变化的 24%。分析的医疗保健提供者-医院特征与剖宫产频率无显著相关性。

结论

尽管患者特征解释了初产妇、足月、单胎、头位剖宫产频率变化的一部分,并且考虑病例组合对医院剖宫产排名有影响,但大多数变化无法用评估的特征来解释。这些发现强调了继续努力了解导致剖宫产率变化的产科护理方面(包括病例组合)的重要性。

相似文献

1
Variation in the Nulliparous, Term, Singleton, Vertex Cesarean Delivery Rate.初产妇、足月、单胎、头位剖宫产率的变化。
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jun;131(6):1039-1048. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002636.
2
Association between vaginal birth after cesarean delivery and primary cesarean delivery rates.剖宫产术后阴道分娩与初次剖宫产率的关系。
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Nov;122(5):1010-1017. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182a91e0f.
3
Assessing hospital differences in low-risk cesarean delivery metrics in Florida.评估佛罗里达州低风险剖宫产指标的医院差异。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Dec;229(6):684.e1-684.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.06.016. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
4
Nulliparous term singleton vertex cesarean delivery rates: institutional and individual level predictors.未生育足月单胎头位剖宫产率:机构和个体层面的预测因素
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jun;198(6):694.e1-11; discussion 694.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.03.026.
5
Reduction in Cesarean Delivery Rates Associated With a State Quality Collaborative in Maryland.马里兰州州立质量协作降低剖宫产率。
Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Oct 1;138(4):583-592. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004540.
6
Comparison of Cesarean Deliveries in a Multicenter U.S. Cohort Using the 10-Group Classification System.使用 10 组分类系统比较美国多中心队列中的剖宫产分娩。
Am J Perinatol. 2024 Jul;41(9):1223-1231. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1748527. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
7
Hospital-Level Variation in the Frequency of Cesarean Delivery Among Nulliparous Women Who Undergo Labor Induction.医院层面上,行引产的初产妇行剖宫产的频率存在差异。
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Dec;136(6):1179-1189. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004139.
8
The relationship between variations in cesarean delivery and regional health care use in the United States.美国剖宫产率变化与区域医疗保健使用的关系。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jun;214(6):735.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.12.023. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
9
Effect of severity of illness on cesarean delivery rates in Washington State.华盛顿州疾病严重程度对剖宫产率的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;217(4):474.e1-474.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.06.020. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
10
Hospital-level variation in racial disparities in low-risk nulliparous cesarean delivery rates.医院层面上低危初产妇剖宫产率种族差异的变化。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Dec;5(12):101145. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101145. Epub 2023 Aug 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Rural-urban and racial differences in cesarean deliveries before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in South Carolina.南卡罗来纳州 COVID-19 大流行前后城乡和种族间剖宫产率的差异。
Midwifery. 2024 Sep;136:104075. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2024.104075. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
2
Association of Maternal Comorbidity Burden With Cesarean Birth Rate Among Nulliparous, Term, Singleton, Vertex Pregnancies.母亲合并症负担与初产妇、足月、单胎、头位妊娠剖宫产率的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Oct 2;6(10):e2338604. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.38604.
3
Evaluation of Cesarean Rates for Term, Singleton, Live Vertex Deliveries in China in 2020 Among Women With No Prior Cesarean Delivery.2020 年中国无剖宫产史的足月、单胎、头位活产产妇的剖宫产率评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e234521. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.4521.
4
Demonstration of the application of the global cesarean section rate model (C-Model) and the Robson Classification to estimate and characterize excess numbers of institutional c-sections.演示全球剖宫产率模型(C 模型)和 Robson 分类法在估计和描述机构性剖宫产术过剩数量方面的应用。
Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol. 2021 Dec 30;72(4):396-406. doi: 10.18597/rcog.3649.
5
American College of Nurse-Midwives Clinical Bulletin Number 18: Induction of Labor.美国护士助产学临床公告第 18 号:引产。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2022 Jan;67(1):140-149. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13337.
6
Factors Associated with Meeting Obstetric Care Consensus Guidelines for Nulliparous, Term, Singleton, Vertex Cesarean Births.与初产妇、足月、单胎、头位剖宫产分娩的产科护理共识指南达成相关的因素。
AJP Rep. 2021 Dec 15;11(4):e142-e146. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1740563. eCollection 2021 Oct.
7
Benchmarking cesarean delivery rates using machine learning-derived optimal classification trees.利用机器学习衍生的最优分类树对剖宫产率进行基准测试。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug;57(4):796-805. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13921. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
8
Variation between hospital caesarean delivery rates when Robson's classification is considered: An observational study from a French perinatal network.当考虑罗伯逊分类法时,医院剖宫产率的差异:来自法国围产期网络的观察性研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 20;16(8):e0251141. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251141. eCollection 2021.
9
Universal versus Risk-Based Management of Unknown Group B Streptococcus Status at Term.足月时B族链球菌未知状态的通用管理与基于风险的管理
AJP Rep. 2019 Jul;9(3):e315-e322. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1695744. Epub 2019 Sep 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Births in the United States, 2016.2016年美国的出生情况。
NCHS Data Brief. 2017 Sep(287):1-8.
2
Racial and Ethnic Differences in Utilization of Labor Management Strategies Intended to Reduce Cesarean Delivery Rates.旨在降低剖宫产率的劳动管理策略使用中的种族和民族差异。
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Dec;130(6):1285-1294. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002343.
3
The relationship between variations in cesarean delivery and regional health care use in the United States.美国剖宫产率变化与区域医疗保健使用的关系。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jun;214(6):735.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.12.023. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
4
WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates.世界卫生组织关于剖宫产率的声明。
BJOG. 2016 Apr;123(5):667-70. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13526. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
5
Comparing variation in hospital rates of cesarean delivery among low-risk women using 3 different measures.比较 3 种不同方法评估的低危产妇剖宫产率的医院间差异。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Feb;214(2):153-163. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.10.935. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
6
Hospital variation in cesarean delivery rates: contribution of individual and hospital factors in Florida.佛罗里达州剖宫产率的医院差异:个体因素和医院因素的作用
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jan;214(1):123.e1-123.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.027. Epub 2015 Aug 17.
7
Variation in hospital caesarean section rates and obstetric outcomes among nulliparae at term: a population-based cohort study.足月初产妇剖宫产率及产科结局的差异:一项基于人群的队列研究。
BJOG. 2015 Apr;122(5):702-11. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13281. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
8
Two practice models in one labor and delivery unit: association with cesarean delivery rates.一个产房的两种实践模式:与剖宫产率的关联
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Apr;212(4):491.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.11.014. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
9
Can differences in obstetric outcomes be explained by differences in the care provided? The MFMU Network APEX study.产科结局的差异能否通过所提供护理的差异来解释?母胎医学单位网络APEX研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Aug;211(2):147.e1-147.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.03.017. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
10
Obstetric care consensus no. 1: safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery.产科保健共识 1:安全预防初次剖宫产。
Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Mar;123(3):693-711. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000444441.04111.1d.