Mutluay Abidin Talha, Mutluay Merve
Vocational School of Health Services, Department of Dental Hygiene, Kirikkale University, Kirikkale, Turkey.
Aust Endod J. 2022 Dec;48(3):501-509. doi: 10.1111/aej.12600. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
Due to favourable biological and physical properties, calcium silicate-based cements (CSCs) are biocompatible materials used widely for vital pulp therapies. Sealing efficacy between the adhesive system and CSC determines the clinical success of treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of CSC to composite resin with different adhesive systems and to analyse the CSC-composite interface. Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) (ProRoot MTA; Dentsply Tulsa Dental, Tulsa, OK), Biodentine (Septodont, Saint-Maur-des-Fossés, France) and NeoMTA Plus (Avalon Biomed Inc., Bradenton, FL) samples (n = 90) were placed in the cavities and divided into three subgroups according to the adhesive family (n = 10). SBSs were measured using a universal testing machine. The interfaces were examined using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) (×1000). NeoMTA Plus showed significantly higher SBS values than MTA and Biodentine (P < 0.0001). The application of total-etch adhesive system over Biodentine and NeoMTA Plus provided the statistically highest bond strength (P < 0.05). However, when the SBS values of MTA subgroups were compared, different adhesive families applied over MTA did not make a significant difference in SBS values (P > 0.05). Based on SEM analyses, the specimens exhibit no gaps, cracks or delamination within the adhesive layer, which indicates a good adhesion between the CSC-composite interface in all subgroups. In conclusion, the different adhesive families used over CSC did not influence interfacial gap formation.
由于具有良好的生物学和物理性能,硅酸钙基水门汀(CSCs)是广泛用于牙髓治疗的生物相容性材料。粘结系统与CSC之间的封闭效果决定了治疗的临床成功率。本研究旨在评估不同粘结系统下CSC与复合树脂之间的剪切粘结强度(SBS),并分析CSC-复合材料界面。将矿物三氧化物凝聚体(MTA)(ProRoot MTA;登士柏 Tulsa 牙科公司,塔尔萨,俄克拉何马州)、生物活性玻璃离子水门汀(Biodentine)(Septodont公司,圣莫尔-德-福塞,法国)和NeoMTA Plus(阿瓦隆生物医学公司,布雷登顿,佛罗里达州)样本(n = 90)置于窝洞中,并根据粘结剂类别分为三个亚组(n = 10)。使用万能试验机测量SBS。使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)(×1000)检查界面。NeoMTA Plus的SBS值显著高于MTA和Biodentine(P < 0.0001)。在Biodentine和NeoMTA Plus上应用全酸蚀粘结系统提供了统计学上最高的粘结强度(P < 0.05)。然而,当比较MTA亚组的SBS值时,在MTA上应用不同的粘结剂类别在SBS值上没有显著差异(P > 0.05)。基于SEM分析,标本在粘结层内未显示间隙、裂缝或分层,这表明所有亚组中CSC-复合材料界面之间具有良好的粘结性。总之,在CSC上使用不同的粘结剂类别不会影响界面间隙的形成。