Suppr超能文献

彩色多谱勒超声和计算机断层扫描在非恶性急性内脏静脉血栓放射学评估中的验证。

Validation of color Doppler ultrasound and computed tomography in the radiologic assessment of non-malignant acute splanchnic vein thrombosis.

机构信息

Department of Medicine II, Medical Center University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

Berta-Ottenstein-Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Dec 20;16(12):e0261499. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261499. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

International guidelines propose color Doppler ultrasound (CDUS) and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) as primary imaging techniques in the diagnosis of acute splanchnic vein thrombosis. However, their reliability in this context is poorly investigated. Therefore, the aim of our study was to validate CDUS and CT in the radiologic assessment of acute splanchnic vein thrombosis, using direct transjugular spleno-portography as gold standard.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

49 patients with non-malignant acute splanchnic vein thrombosis were included in a retrospective, multicenter analysis. The thrombosis' extent in five regions of the splanchnic venous system (right and left intrahepatic portal vein, main trunk of the portal vein, splenic vein, superior mesenteric vein) and the degree of thrombosis (patent, partial thrombosis, complete thrombosis) were assessed by portography, CDUS and CT in a blinded manner. Reliability of CDUS and CT with regard to portography as gold standard was analyzed by calculating Cohen's kappa.

RESULTS

Results of CDUS and CT were consistent with portography in 76.6% and 78.4% of examinations, respectively. Cohen's kappa demonstrated that CDUS and CT delivered almost equally reliable results with regard to the portographic gold standard (k = 0.634 [p < 0.001] vs. k = 0.644 [p < 0.001]). In case of findings non-consistent with portography there was no clear trend to over- or underestimation of the degree of thrombosis in both CDUS (60.0% vs. 40.0%) and CT (59.5% vs. 40.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

CDUS and CT are equally reliable tools in the radiologic assessment of non-malignant acute splanchnic vein thrombosis.

摘要

介绍

国际指南建议彩色多普勒超声(CDUS)和对比增强计算机断层扫描(CT)作为急性内脏静脉血栓形成诊断的主要影像学技术。然而,它们在这方面的可靠性尚未得到充分研究。因此,我们的研究目的是使用直接经颈静脉脾门静脉造影术作为金标准,验证 CDUS 和 CT 在急性内脏静脉血栓形成的放射学评估中的作用。

材料和方法

我们对 49 例非恶性急性内脏静脉血栓形成患者进行了回顾性多中心分析。通过经颈静脉脾门静脉造影术、CDUS 和 CT 以盲法评估内脏静脉系统五个区域(右、左肝内门静脉、门静脉主干、脾静脉、肠系膜上静脉)的血栓程度和血栓程度(通畅、部分血栓形成、完全血栓形成)。通过计算 Cohen's kappa 来分析 CDUS 和 CT 相对于金标准经颈静脉脾门静脉造影术的可靠性。

结果

CDUS 和 CT 的结果与经颈静脉脾门静脉造影术一致的比例分别为 76.6%和 78.4%。Cohen's kappa 表明,CDUS 和 CT 在与经颈静脉脾门静脉造影术的金标准相比,结果具有几乎相同的可靠性(k=0.634,p<0.001 与 k=0.644,p<0.001)。在与经颈静脉脾门静脉造影术不一致的情况下,CDUS(60.0%与 40.0%)和 CT(59.5%与 40.5%)均未出现明显的高估或低估血栓程度的趋势。

结论

CDUS 和 CT 是评估非恶性急性内脏静脉血栓形成的可靠影像学工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/504a/8687587/a00772af3e47/pone.0261499.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验