Suppr超能文献

高血压患者高效低成本电子健康计划的成功因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Success factors in high-effect, low-cost eHealth programs for patients with hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Cardiology Centers of the Netherlands, The Netherlands.

Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Internal and Vascular Medicine, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2021 Dec 20;28(14):1579-1587. doi: 10.1177/2047487320957170. Epub 2020 Sep 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

eHealth programs can lower blood pressure but also drive healthcare costs. This study aims to review the evidence on the effectiveness and costs of eHealth for hypertension and assess commonalities in programs with high effect and low additional cost.

RESULTS

Overall, the incremental decrease in systolic blood pressure using eHealth, compared to usual care, was 3.87 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.98-4.77) mmHg at 6 months and 5.68 (95% CI 4.77-6.59) mmHg at 12 months' follow-up. High intensity interventions were more effective, resulting in a 2.6 (95% CI 0.5-4.7) (at 6 months) and 3.3 (95% CI 1.4-5.1) (at 12 months) lower systolic blood pressure, but were also more costly, resulting in €170 (95% CI 56-284) higher costs at 6 months and €342 (95% CI 128-556) at 12 months. Programs that included a high volume of participants showed €203 (95% CI 99-307) less costs than those with a low volume at 6 months, and €525 (95% CI 299-751) at 12 months without showing a difference in systolic blood pressure. Studies that implemented eHealth as a partial replacement, rather than addition to usual care, were also less costly (€119 (95% CI -38-201 at 6 months) and €346 (95% CI 261-430 at 12 months)) without being less effective. Evidence on eHealth programs for hypertension is ambiguous, heterogeneity on effectiveness and costs is high (I2 = 56-98%).

CONCLUSION

Effective eHealth with limited additional costs should focus on high intensity interventions, involve a large number of participants and use eHealth as a partial replacement for usual care.

摘要

背景

电子健康计划可以降低血压,但也会推高医疗保健成本。本研究旨在综述电子健康干预治疗高血压的有效性和成本,并评估那些具有高效果和低额外成本的项目的共同特点。

结果

总体而言,与常规护理相比,使用电子健康的收缩压平均下降了 3.87mmHg(95%置信区间(CI)2.98-4.77),在 6 个月和 5.68mmHg(95%CI 4.77-6.59)的 12 个月随访中。高强度干预更为有效,导致收缩压降低 2.6mmHg(95%CI 0.5-4.7)(6 个月)和 3.3mmHg(95%CI 1.4-5.1)(12 个月),但成本也更高,6 个月时增加了 170 欧元(95%CI 56-284),12 个月时增加了 342 欧元(95%CI 128-556)。参与者数量较多的项目在 6 个月时的成本比参与者数量较少的项目低 203 欧元(95%CI 99-307),12 个月时低 525 欧元(95%CI 299-751),但收缩压没有差异。将电子健康作为常规护理的部分替代而非附加手段实施的研究也更具成本效益(6 个月时为 119 欧元(95%CI -38-201),12 个月时为 346 欧元(95%CI 261-430)),同时效果也不差。电子健康干预治疗高血压的证据并不明确,效果和成本的异质性很高(I2=56-98%)。

结论

具有有限额外成本的有效电子健康应侧重于高强度干预,涉及大量参与者,并将电子健康作为常规护理的部分替代手段。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验