. Departamento de Pneumologia, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Porto, Portugal.
J Bras Pneumol. 2021 Dec 15;47(6):e20210286. doi: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20210286. eCollection 2021.
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common disorder associated with a significant economic burden. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and auto-titrating positive airway pressure (APAP) are recognized therapeutic options in patients with OSA, although treatment costs are higher with APAP. We conducted a study aimed at evaluating the effectiveness and potential cost savings resulting from the implementation of a protocol guiding the transition to CPAP in OSA patients previously treated with APAP.
This prospective study included patients with OSA under APAP who were followed up at the Sleep Medicine outpatient clinic of a tertiary referral hospital between January 2019 and January 2021. Treatment was switched to CPAP in patients who met the following criteria: satisfactory adaptation and adherence to APAP, residual apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) of < 5/hour, and no relevant air leaks. APAP and CPAP outcomes were compared and an estimate of the savings obtained by the transition from APAP to CPAP was calculated.
Ninety-three patients were included in the study. APAP and CPAP were both effective in correcting obstructive events and improving daytime sleepiness. No significant differences were found regarding treatment adherence and tolerance between both PAP modalities. The selection of fixed-pressure CPAP through 90th or 95th percentile APAP pressure proved to be effective and an alternative strategy to titration polysomnography. At the end of this two-year study, the transition from APAP to CPAP enabled savings of at least 10,353€.
The transition from APAP to CPAP may be an effective, well-tolerated, safe, and cost-saving strategy in patients with OSA.
阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)是一种常见疾病,与巨大的经济负担相关。持续气道正压通气(CPAP)和自动调压气道正压通气(APAP)被认为是 OSA 患者的治疗选择,尽管 APAP 的治疗费用更高。我们进行了一项研究,旨在评估在先前接受 APAP 治疗的 OSA 患者中实施指导向 CPAP 转换的方案的有效性和潜在成本节约。
这项前瞻性研究纳入了在 2019 年 1 月至 2021 年 1 月期间在一家三级转诊医院的睡眠医学门诊接受 APAP 治疗的 OSA 患者。如果患者符合以下标准,则将治疗方案转换为 CPAP:APAP 适配和依从性良好、残留呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)<5/h、无相关气漏。比较 APAP 和 CPAP 的结果,并计算从 APAP 转换为 CPAP 获得的节约估计。
共有 93 名患者纳入研究。APAP 和 CPAP 均能有效纠正阻塞性事件和改善白天嗜睡。两种 PAP 模式的治疗依从性和耐受性均无显著差异。通过 APAP 压力的第 90 或 95 百分位选择固定压力 CPAP 被证明是有效和替代滴定多导睡眠图的策略。在这项为期两年的研究结束时,从 APAP 向 CPAP 的转换至少节省了 10353 欧元。
对于 OSA 患者,从 APAP 向 CPAP 的转换可能是一种有效、耐受性良好、安全且节省成本的策略。