Suppr超能文献

干预肠道微生物群对抑郁症状影响的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。

The effect of interventions targeting gut microbiota on depressive symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Community Health Sciences (Hofmeister, Clement, Patten, Li, Dowsett, Farkas, Mastikhina, Egunsola, Diaz), and O'Brien Institute for Public Health (Hofmeister, Clement, Patten, Li, Dowsett, Farkas, Mastikhina, Egunsola, Diaz), and Departments of Psychiatry (Patten, Taylor) and Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (Cooke), Teaching Research and Wellness Building, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.

出版信息

CMAJ Open. 2021 Dec 21;9(4):E1195-E1204. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20200283. Print 2021 Oct-Dec.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite their popularity, the efficacy of interventions targeting gut microbiota to improve depressive symptoms is unknown. Our objective is to summarize the effect of microbiome-targeting interventions on depressive symptoms.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials from inception to Mar. 5, 2021. We included studies that evaluated probiotic, prebiotic, synbiotic, paraprobiotic or fecal microbiota transplant interventions in an adult population (age ≥ 18 yr) with an inactive or placebo comparator (defined by the absence of active intervention). Studies must have measured depressive symptoms with a validated scale, and used a randomized controlled trial study design. We conducted a random effects meta-analysis of change scores, using standardized mean difference as the measure of effect.

RESULTS

Sixty-two studies formed the final data set, with 50 included in the meta-analysis. Probiotic, prebiotic, and synbiotic interventions on depressive symptoms showed statistically significant benefits. In the single studies evaluating each of fecal microbiota transplant and paraprobiotic interventions, neither showed a statistically significant benefit.

INTERPRETATION

Despite promising findings of benefit of probiotic, prebiotic and synbiotic interventions for depressive symptoms in study populations, there is not yet strong enough evidence to favour inclusion of these interventions in treatment guidelines for depression. Critical questions about species administered, dosage and timing relative to other antidepressant medications remain to be answered.

STUDY REGISTRATION

PROSPERO no. 143178.

摘要

背景

尽管针对肠道微生物群的干预措施在改善抑郁症状方面很受欢迎,但它们的疗效尚不清楚。我们的目的是总结靶向微生物组干预措施对抑郁症状的影响。

方法

我们进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。我们检索了 MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO、疗效摘要数据库、Cochrane 系统评价数据库和 Cochrane 对照试验注册库,检索时间截至 2021 年 3 月 5 日。我们纳入了在成年人群(年龄≥18 岁)中评估益生菌、益生元、合生元、拟益生菌或粪便微生物群移植干预措施的研究,这些研究有一个非活性或安慰剂对照(通过缺乏活性干预来定义)。研究必须使用经过验证的量表测量抑郁症状,并使用随机对照试验研究设计。我们对变化分数进行了随机效应荟萃分析,使用标准化均数差作为效应的衡量标准。

结果

62 项研究形成了最终数据集,其中 50 项研究纳入了荟萃分析。针对抑郁症状的益生菌、益生元和合生元干预措施显示出统计学上的显著益处。在单独评估粪便微生物群移植和拟益生菌干预的每项研究中,都没有显示出统计学上的显著益处。

结论

尽管在研究人群中,益生菌、益生元和合生元干预措施对抑郁症状有有益的发现,但还没有足够有力的证据支持将这些干预措施纳入抑郁症治疗指南。关于管理的物种、剂量以及与其他抗抑郁药物的时间关系等关键问题仍有待回答。

研究注册

PROSPERO 编号 143178。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4df3/8695538/7f629a6f90b8/cmajo.20200283f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验