Vasiliu Octavian
Department of Psychiatry, Dr. Carol Davila University Emergency Central Military Hospital, Bucharest, Romania.
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Feb 23;14:1074736. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1074736. eCollection 2023.
The need to find new therapeutic interventions in patients diagnosed with psychiatric disorders is supported by the data suggesting high rates of relapse, chronic evolution, therapeutic resistance, or lack of adherence and disability. The use of pre-, pro-, or synbiotics as add-ons in the therapeutic management of psychiatric disorders has been explored as a new way to augment the efficacy of psychotropics and to improve the chances for these patients to reach response or remission. This systematic literature review focused on the efficacy and tolerability of psychobiotics in the main categories of psychiatric disorders and it has been conducted through the most important electronic databases and clinical trial registers, using the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. The quality of primary and secondary reports was assessed using the criteria identified by the Academy of Nutrition and Diabetics. Forty-three sources, mostly of moderate and high quality, were reviewed in detail, and data regarding the efficacy and tolerability of psychobiotics was assessed. Studies exploring the effects of psychobiotics in mood disorders, anxiety disorders, schizophrenia spectrum disorders, substance use disorders, eating disorders, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), neurocognitive disorders, and autism spectrum disorders (ASD) were included. The overall tolerability of the interventions assessed was good, but the evidence to support their efficacy in specific psychiatric disorders was mixed. There have been identified data in favor of probiotics for patients with mood disorders, ADHD, and ASD, and also for the association of probiotics and selenium or synbiotics in patients with neurocognitive disorders. In several domains, the research is still in an early phase of development, e.g., in substance use disorders (only three preclinical studies being found) or eating disorders (one review was identified). Although no well-defined clinical recommendation could yet be formulated for a specific product in patients with psychiatric disorders, there is encouraging evidence to support further research, especially if focused on the identification of specific sub-populations that may benefit from this intervention. Several limitations regarding the research in this field should be addressed, i.e., the majority of the finalized trials are of short duration, there is an inherent heterogeneity of the psychiatric disorders, and the diversity of the explored Philae prevents the generalizability of the results from clinical studies.
数据表明,被诊断患有精神疾病的患者复发率高、病情呈慢性发展、存在治疗抵抗或缺乏依从性以及残疾,这支持了寻找新治疗干预措施的必要性。益生元、益生菌或合生元作为精神疾病治疗管理中的附加疗法已被探索,作为增强精神药物疗效和提高这些患者达到缓解或痊愈机会的一种新方法。本系统文献综述聚焦于精神益生菌在主要精神疾病类别中的疗效和耐受性,它是根据PRISMA 2020指南,通过最重要的电子数据库和临床试验注册库进行的。使用营养与糖尿病学会确定的标准评估了一级和二级报告的质量。详细审查了43篇来源,大多为中等质量和高质量,并评估了有关精神益生菌疗效和耐受性的数据。纳入了探索精神益生菌在情绪障碍、焦虑障碍、精神分裂症谱系障碍、物质使用障碍、饮食障碍、注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)、神经认知障碍和自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)中的作用的研究。所评估干预措施的总体耐受性良好,但支持其在特定精神疾病中疗效的证据不一。已确定有数据表明益生菌对患有情绪障碍、ADHD和ASD的患者有益,对于神经认知障碍患者,益生菌与硒或合生元联合使用也有益。在几个领域,研究仍处于早期发展阶段,例如在物质使用障碍(仅发现三项临床前研究)或饮食障碍(确定了一篇综述)方面。尽管目前还无法针对患有精神疾病的患者为特定产品制定明确的临床建议,但有令人鼓舞的证据支持进一步研究,特别是如果专注于确定可能从这种干预中受益的特定亚人群。该领域研究存在若干局限性,即大多数最终试验持续时间较短,精神疾病存在内在异质性,并且所探索的菌株多样性妨碍了临床研究结果进行推广。