Akbari Mehdi, Seydavi Mohammad, Palmieri Sara, Mansueto Giovanni, Caselli Gabriele, Spada Marcantonio M
1 Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Education, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Division of Psychology, School of Applied Sciences, London South Bank University, London, UK.
J Behav Addict. 2021 Dec 17;10(4):879-900. doi: 10.1556/2006.2021.00083.
FoMO has been considered a predisposing factor toward excessive internet use, and a great deal of literature has investigated the link between FoMO and internet use. However, there is still a lack of cohesion in the literature.
The current study have been conducted and reported in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA).
In the current systematic review and meta-analysis of 86 effect-sizes, representative of 55,134 participants (Mean age = 22.07, SD = 6.15, females = 58.37%), we found that the strength of the trait FoMO- internet use association significantly varies from r = 0.11 to r = 0.63. In some populations, FoMO appears to increase with age and it is reverse in other populations. Facebook use was unrelated to FoMO in some populations, and higher FoMO was linked with stopping Instagram use for some individuals. The FoMO- internet use association was independent of their severity, as the interaction was not significant, and this association was neither linear nor curvilinear. The FoMO-internet use association does not appear to be associated with depressive, anxiety, and stress symptoms or level of life satisfaction. The COVID-19 pandemic was the only significant moderator of the FoMO-internet use association, strengthening this relationship.
FoMO demonstrates a considerable role in internet use; however, there is no evidence of interaction or bi-directional association between the mentioned. Overall, we still don't know what factors contribute to individuals exhibiting distinct patterns in the FoMO-internet use association.
错失恐惧症(FoMO)被认为是过度使用互联网的一个诱发因素,大量文献对FoMO与互联网使用之间的联系进行了研究。然而,文献中仍缺乏连贯性。
本研究已按照系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)进行并报告。
在本次对86个效应量的系统评价和Meta分析中,涉及55134名参与者(平均年龄 = 22.07,标准差 = 6.15,女性 = 58.37%),我们发现特质FoMO与互联网使用之间关联的强度显著变化,从r = 0.11到r = 0.63。在一些人群中,FoMO似乎随年龄增长而增加,而在其他人群中则相反。在一些人群中,使用Facebook与FoMO无关,而对一些个体来说,较高的FoMO与停止使用Instagram有关。FoMO与互联网使用之间的关联独立于其严重程度,因为交互作用不显著,且这种关联既不是线性的也不是曲线的。FoMO与互联网使用之间的关联似乎与抑郁、焦虑和压力症状或生活满意度水平无关。新冠疫情是FoMO与互联网使用关联的唯一显著调节因素,加强了这种关系。
FoMO在互联网使用中发挥着相当大的作用;然而,没有证据表明上述两者之间存在交互作用或双向关联。总体而言,我们仍然不知道哪些因素导致个体在FoMO与互联网使用的关联中表现出不同的模式。