“诊断膨胀”不会解决成瘾性网络行为研究中的分类问题。
"Diagnostic inflation" will not resolve taxonomical problems in the study of addictive online behaviours. •
机构信息
1Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School, Nepean Clinical School, Discipline of Psychiatry, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
2College of Education, Psychology, & Social Work, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
出版信息
J Behav Addict. 2020 Dec 8;9(4):915-919. doi: 10.1556/2006.2020.00083.
Abstract
This article suggests that the type of Internet-enabled device should not be prioritised when conceptualizing diagnostic categories of addictive online behaviours. The diagnostic distinction between "predominantly mobile" and "predominantly non-mobile" forms of Internet use disorders (IUD) is not empirically based, may not be clinically useful and may lead to "diagnostic inflation." Problems with the concepts of smartphone use disorder and IUD on which the proposed distinction is largely based call for their re-examination. Future proposals for the taxonomy of addictive behaviours may not need to be based on online/offline and mobile/non-mobile dichotomies.
摘要
本文认为，在构思成瘾性网络行为的诊断类别时，不应优先考虑支持互联网的设备类型。将“主要是移动设备”和“主要是非移动设备”的互联网使用障碍（IUD）形式进行诊断区分，没有实证依据，可能在临床上没有用处，并且可能导致“诊断过度”。基于所提议的区分而提出的智能手机使用障碍和 IUD 的概念存在问题，需要对其进行重新审查。未来成瘾行为分类学的建议可能不需要基于在线/离线和移动/非移动的二分法。
相似文献
1
"Diagnostic inflation" will not resolve taxonomical problems in the study of addictive online behaviours. •“诊断膨胀”不会解决成瘾性网络行为研究中的分类问题。
J Behav Addict. 2020 Dec 8;9(4):915-919. doi: 10.1556/2006.2020.00083.
2
Internet use disorders: What's new and what's not?. •网络使用障碍：新的和不变的是什么？
J Behav Addict. 2020 Oct 3;9(4):934-937. doi: 10.1556/2006.2020.00072.
3
How to overcome taxonomical problems in the study of Internet use disorders and what to do with "smartphone addiction"?如何克服互联网使用障碍研究中的分类问题，以及如何处理“智能手机成瘾”？
J Behav Addict. 2021 Jan 15;9(4):908-914. doi: 10.1556/2006.8.2019.59.
4
Addressing taxonomic challenges for Internet Use Disorders in light of changing technologies and diagnostic classifications. •针对互联网使用障碍在技术和诊断分类变化方面的分类挑战提出应对措施。
J Behav Addict. 2020 Dec 8;9(4):942-944. doi: 10.1556/2006.2020.00094.
5
Developmental and family considerations in internet use disorder taxonomy. Commentary on: How to overcome taxonomical problems in the study of Internet use disorders and what to do with "smartphone addiction"? (Montag et al., 2020).互联网使用障碍分类学中的发展和家庭因素考量。述评：如何克服互联网使用障碍研究中的分类学问题以及如何处理“智能手机成瘾”？（Montag 等人，2020 年）。
J Behav Addict. 2020 Dec 8;9(4):920-923. doi: 10.1556/2006.2020.00085.
6
Symptoms and functional impairments in patients with Internet Use Disorders participating in an online short-term therapy.网络使用障碍患者参与在线短期治疗后的症状和功能障碍。
Compr Psychiatry. 2024 May;131:152471. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2024.152471. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
7
Two-dimensional taxonomy of internet addiction and assessment of smartphone addiction with diagnostic criteria and mobile apps.互联网成瘾的二维分类法与使用诊断标准和手机应用程序评估智能手机成瘾
J Behav Addict. 2021 Jan 6;9(4):928-933. doi: 10.1556/2006.2020.00074.
8
Mobile and non-mobile Internet Use Disorder: Specific risks and possible shared Pavlovian conditioning processes. •移动和非移动互联网使用障碍：特定风险和可能共享的巴甫洛夫条件反射过程。•
J Behav Addict. 2020 Nov 2;9(4):938-941. doi: 10.1556/2006.2020.00077.
9
Applying fairness in labeling various types of internet use disorders. •公平标注各类网络使用障碍。
J Behav Addict. 2020 Oct 6;9(4):924-927. doi: 10.1556/2006.2020.00071.
10
Time distortion associated with smartphone addiction: Identifying smartphone addiction via a mobile application (App).与智能手机成瘾相关的时间扭曲：通过移动应用程序（App）识别智能手机成瘾
J Psychiatr Res. 2015 Jun;65:139-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2015.04.003. Epub 2015 Apr 10.
引用本文的文献
1
Childhood maltreatment and problematic smartphone use: A multilevel, meta-analytic review.童年期虐待与问题智能手机使用：一项多层次的元分析综述
J Behav Addict. 2025 Jun 23;14(2):644-659. doi: 10.1556/2006.2025.00050. Print 2025 Jul 2.
2
Problematic Online Video Watching, Boredom Proneness and Loneliness Among First-Year Chinese Undergraduates: A Two-Wave Longitudinal Study.中国大一本科生中存在问题的网络视频观看、无聊倾向与孤独感：一项两阶段纵向研究
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2025 Feb 3;18:241-253. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S498142. eCollection 2025.
3
Construction and validation of the motives for smartphone use questionnaire.智能手机使用动机问卷的构建与验证
J Behav Addict. 2025 Feb 6;14(1):373-393. doi: 10.1556/2006.2025.00006. Print 2025 Mar 28.
4
The Self-perception of Text message Dependence Scale (STDS): A Brazilian-Portuguese validation and expansion of its psychometric properties.短信依赖量表的自我认知（STDS）：巴西葡萄牙语版的效度验证及其心理测量特性的扩展
Curr Psychol. 2022 Mar 11:1-12. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-02957-8.
5
Problematic Smartphone Use and Problematic Social Media Use: The Predictive Role of Self-Construal and the Mediating Effect of Fear Missing Out.问题性智能手机使用和问题性社交媒体使用：自我建构的预测作用及错失恐惧的中介作用
Front Public Health. 2022 Feb 23;10:814468. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.814468. eCollection 2022.
6
Fear of missing out (FoMO) and internet use: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.错失恐惧症（FoMO）与互联网使用：一项全面的系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Behav Addict. 2021 Dec 17;10(4):879-900. doi: 10.1556/2006.2021.00083.
7
Anxiety sensitivity mediates relations between anxiety (but not depression) and problematic smartphone use severity, adjusting for age and sex, in Chinese adolescents early in the COVID-19 pandemic.在新冠疫情初期的中国青少年中，焦虑敏感性在焦虑（而非抑郁）与问题智能手机使用严重程度之间起中介作用，同时对年龄和性别进行了调整。
Hum Behav Emerg Technol. 2021 Dec;3(5):788-797. doi: 10.1002/hbe2.319. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
8
Can Watching Online Videos Be Addictive? A Qualitative Exploration of Online Video Watching among Chinese Young Adults.看在线视频会上瘾吗？对中国青年观看在线视频的定性探索。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 6;18(14):7247. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147247.
9
A systematic review of metacognitions in Internet Gaming Disorder and problematic Internet, smartphone and social networking sites use.对网络赌博障碍和问题性网络、智能手机及社交网站使用中的元认知进行的系统回顾。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2021 Nov;28(6):1494-1508. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2588. Epub 2021 May 4.
本文引用的文献
1
Maladaptive player-game relationships in problematic gaming and gaming disorder: A systematic review.病理性游戏和游戏障碍中适应不良的玩家-游戏关系：系统综述。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2019 Nov;73:101777. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2019.101777. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
2
How to overcome taxonomical problems in the study of Internet use disorders and what to do with "smartphone addiction"?如何克服互联网使用障碍研究中的分类问题，以及如何处理“智能手机成瘾”？
J Behav Addict. 2021 Jan 15;9(4):908-914. doi: 10.1556/2006.8.2019.59.
3
Technology-mediated addictive behaviors constitute a spectrum of related yet distinct conditions: A network perspective.技术介导的成瘾行为构成了一系列相关但不同的条件：网络视角。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2018 Aug;32(5):564-572. doi: 10.1037/adb0000379. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
4
The impact of Internet-based specific activities on the perceptions of Internet addiction, quality of life, and excessive usage: A cross-sectional study.基于互联网的特定活动对网络成瘾认知、生活质量和过度使用的影响：一项横断面研究。
Addict Behav Rep. 2015 Mar 20;1:19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.abrep.2015.03.002. eCollection 2015 Jun.
5
Internet addiction: reappraisal of an increasingly inadequate concept.网络成瘾：对一个日益不适用概念的重新评估。
CNS Spectr. 2017 Feb;22(1):7-13. doi: 10.1017/S1092852915000863. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
6
Is excessive online usage a function of medium or activity? An empirical pilot study.过度上网使用是媒介还是活动的功能？一项实证初步研究。
J Behav Addict. 2014 Mar;3(1):74-7. doi: 10.1556/JBA.2.2013.016. Epub 2013 Dec 6.
7
Is it meaningful to distinguish between generalized and specific Internet addiction? Evidence from a cross-cultural study from Germany, Sweden, Taiwan and China.区分广泛性网络成瘾和特定性网络成瘾有意义吗？来自德国、瑞典、台湾和中国大陆的一项跨文化研究的证据。
Asia Pac Psychiatry. 2015 Mar;7(1):20-6. doi: 10.1111/appy.12122. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
8
Diagnostic inflation: causes and a suggested cure.诊断通胀：成因及建议的解决办法。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2012 Jun;200(6):474-9. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e318257c4a2.
9
Holding the line against diagnostic inflation in psychiatry.抵制精神病学诊断标准的膨胀
Psychother Psychosom. 2012;81(1):5-10. doi: 10.1159/000331565. Epub 2011 Nov 22.
Zotero 插件