Suppr超能文献

基于整合系统的家庭初级保健对痴呆症的混合方法评估。

A mixed-methods evaluation of home-based primary care in dementia within an integrated system.

机构信息

Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California, USA.

Panorama City Medical Center, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California, USA.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Apr;70(4):1136-1146. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17627. Epub 2021 Dec 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

No prior studies have examined the effects of home-based primary care (HBPC) in persons living with dementia (PLWD), within an ecosystem of serious illness care in an integrated healthcare system. Our objectives were to compare the characteristics of PLWD receiving HBPC and their hospital utilization and end-of-life care, with those of a matched comparison group, and to understand the experiences of family caregivers of PLWD receiving HBPC.

METHODS

This mixed-methods study used a retrospective observational cohort design with PLWD receiving HBPC (n = 287) from 2015 to 2020 and a strata-matched comparison group (n = 861), and qualitative phone interviews with 16 HBPC family caregivers in 2020. Inverse probability of treatment weighting propensity score-adjusted models were used to compare time-to-first hospital-based utilization and, for decedents, home palliative and hospice care and place of death. Care experience was captured through caregiver interviews.

RESULTS

Patients receiving HBPC had a similar risk of hospital utilization [adjusted hazard ratio, 1.06 (95% CI: 0.89-1.26), p = 0.51] as a matched non-HBPC comparison group after a median follow-up of 199 days. However, HBPC decedents (n = 159) were more likely to receive home palliative care or hospice [rate ratio, RR: 1.23 (95% CI: 1.07-1.42), p < 0.01] and to die at home [RR: 1.66 (95% CI: 1.35-2.05), p < 0.001] than were non-HBPC decedents (n = 423). Caregivers reported that HBPC provided coordinated, continuous, and convenient care that was aligned with families' priorities and goals; however, some expressed unmet needs, especially for help paying for personal care and medical supplies/equipment, and a desire for clearer communication about program operations and more quality oversight for contract services.

CONCLUSIONS

Although HBPC for PLWD was associated with a similar risk of hospital utilization compared to a matched non-HBPC comparison group, HBPC resulted in more patient-centered end-of-life care for decedents. Prospective studies of HBPC that further elicit and address unmet needs are warranted.

摘要

背景

在综合医疗体系中,针对患有痴呆症(PLWD)的患者,此前尚无研究调查家庭初级保健(HBPC)对其产生的影响,而这些患者也属于严重疾病护理生态系统中的一员。我们的目标是比较接受 HBPC 的 PLWD 患者的特征及其与匹配对照组的医院利用情况和临终关怀,并了解接受 HBPC 的 PLWD 患者的家庭照顾者的经历。

方法

本混合方法研究采用回顾性观察队列设计,纳入了 2015 年至 2020 年期间接受 HBPC 的 287 名 PLWD 患者(n=287)和 861 名匹配对照组患者,并在 2020 年对 16 名接受 HBPC 的家庭照顾者进行了电话定性访谈。使用逆概率治疗加权倾向评分调整模型比较了首次基于医院的利用时间,对于死者,比较了家庭姑息治疗和临终关怀以及死亡地点。通过照顾者访谈获得了照顾经验。

结果

在中位随访 199 天后,接受 HBPC 的患者与匹配的非 HBPC 对照组相比,其医院利用情况的风险相似[调整后的风险比,1.06(95%CI:0.89-1.26),p=0.51]。然而,HBPC 死亡患者(n=159)更有可能接受家庭姑息治疗或临终关怀[比率比,RR:1.23(95%CI:1.07-1.42),p<0.01],且更有可能在家中死亡[RR:1.66(95%CI:1.35-2.05),p<0.001],而非 HBPC 死亡患者(n=423)。照顾者报告称,HBPC 提供了协调、持续和便利的护理,符合家庭的优先事项和目标;然而,一些人表示存在未满足的需求,特别是在个人护理和医疗用品/设备的费用方面,以及希望更清楚地了解项目运作并对合同服务进行更多质量监督。

结论

尽管与匹配的非 HBPC 对照组相比,PLWD 接受 HBPC 与医院利用率的风险相似,但 HBPC 为死者提供了更以患者为中心的临终关怀。需要进行前瞻性研究进一步探讨和满足 HBPC 的未满足需求。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验