Suppr超能文献

居家初级保健模式下对痴呆症护理者及患者的照护:一项干预性临床试验方案

Caring for caregivers and persons living with dementia under home-based primary care: protocol for an interventional clinical trial.

作者信息

Sy Maimouna, Thacker Ayush, Sheehan Orla C, Leff Bruce, Ritchie Christine Seel

机构信息

Center for Aging and Serious Illness, Department of Palliative Care and Geriatric Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024 Feb 9;10(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s40814-024-01455-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Approximately 7.5 million older adults are homebound, who have difficulty and/or need assistance to leave their homes. In this growing population, the prevalence of people living with dementia (PLWD) is approximately 50%. Current dementia care models in the USA were developed for traditional office-based primary care and have not been tailored to home-based primary care (HBPC) delivery models. Literature has shown that office-based collaborative interventions can improve caregiver outcomes including caregiver stress, well-being, and morbidity and patient outcomes including improved quality of life and reduced emergency department visits (Possin KL, Merrilees JJ, Dulaney S, Bonasera SJ, Chiong W, Lee K, JAMA Int Med 179:1658, 2019). To date, the evidence for HBPC dementia interventions is lacking. Though HBPC has demonstrated benefit in homebound older adults, there is limited literature on the effects of HBPC on persons living with dementia (Nguyen HQ, Vallejo JD, Macias M, Shiffman MG, Rosen R, Mowry V, J Am Geriatr Soc 70:1136-46, 2021). Our goal is to develop a HBPC-focused dementia care intervention that integrates the components of two previously developed dementia care models and test the feasibility of implementing it in HBPC practices to improve the quality of life and wellbeing of homebound PLWD and their caregivers.

METHODS

We will first conduct qualitative focus groups at two HBPC practice sites, one in the Southeast and one in Hawaii in order to obtain preliminary feedback on the proposed intervention. At each site, there will be one focus group with caregivers of PLWD and another with HBPC clinicians and staff to help develop and refine our intervention. We will then conduct an open-pilot trial of the refined intervention at the two HBPC practices. A total of up to 25 patient/caregiver dyads will be recruited at each site (N = 50 total). Outcomes measured through pre-and-post assessments and exit interviews will include (a) feasibility for the caregiver to engage with and complete baseline assessments and access educational materials and community resources and (b) feasibility for the practice to identify potential caregivers/patients, assess eligible patient/caregiver dyads, use patient and caregiver assessments, recruit patient/caregiver dyads, recruit racial and ethnic minorities, use care modules, and engage with the tele-video case conference, (c) net promoter score, (d) acceptability of the intervention to caregivers and patients to participate in the intervention, (e) caregivers feeling heard and understood, and (f) caregiver well-being.

DISCUSSION

Testing the feasibility and acceptability of the adapted intervention in these two HBPC practices will provide the basis for future testing and evaluation of a fully powered intervention for PLWD and their caregivers cared for in HBPC with the goal of disseminating high-quality and comprehensive dementia-care focused interventions into HBPC practices.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05849259 in May 2023.

摘要

背景

约750万老年人居家不出,他们离开家有困难和/或需要帮助。在这一不断增长的人群中,痴呆症患者(PLWD)的患病率约为50%。美国目前的痴呆症护理模式是为传统的基于办公室的初级护理而开发的,尚未针对基于家庭的初级护理(HBPC)提供模式进行调整。文献表明,基于办公室的协作干预可以改善护理人员的结局,包括护理人员的压力、幸福感和发病率,以及患者的结局,包括提高生活质量和减少急诊就诊次数(波辛KL、梅里利斯JJ、杜拉尼S、博纳塞拉SJ、琼W、李K,《美国医学会内科杂志》179:1658,2019)。迄今为止,缺乏关于HBPC痴呆症干预措施的证据。尽管HBPC已证明对居家不出的老年人有益,但关于HBPC对痴呆症患者影响的文献有限(阮HQ、巴列霍JD、马西亚斯M、希夫曼MG、罗森R、莫里V,《美国老年医学会杂志》70:1136 - 46,2021)。我们的目标是开发一种以HBPC为重点的痴呆症护理干预措施,整合之前开发的两种痴呆症护理模式的组成部分,并测试在HBPC实践中实施该措施的可行性,以提高居家不出的PLWD及其护理人员的生活质量和幸福感。

方法

我们将首先在两个HBPC实践地点进行定性焦点小组讨论,一个在东南部,一个在夏威夷,以便获得对拟议干预措施的初步反馈。在每个地点,将有一个由PLWD护理人员组成的焦点小组,另一个由HBPC临床医生和工作人员组成的焦点小组,以帮助制定和完善我们的干预措施。然后,我们将在这两个HBPC实践中对完善后的干预措施进行开放试点试验。每个地点最多将招募25对患者/护理人员(总共N = 50)。通过前后评估和退出访谈测量的结局将包括:(a)护理人员参与并完成基线评估、获取教育材料和社区资源的可行性;(b)实践机构识别潜在护理人员/患者、评估符合条件的患者/护理人员对、使用患者和护理人员评估、招募患者/护理人员对、招募种族和族裔少数群体、使用护理模块以及参与远程视频病例会议的可行性;(c)净促进者得分;(d)干预措施对护理人员和患者参与干预的可接受性;(e)护理人员感到被倾听和理解;(f)护理人员的幸福感。

讨论

在这两个HBPC实践中测试适应性干预措施的可行性和可接受性,将为未来对在HBPC中接受护理的PLWD及其护理人员进行全面干预的测试和评估提供基础,目标是将高质量和全面的痴呆症护理重点干预措施推广到HBPC实践中。

试验注册

该试验于2023年5月在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册,注册号为NCT05849259。

相似文献

3
A Scoping Review of Dementia Interventions in Home-Based Primary Care.家庭初级保健中痴呆干预措施的范围综述。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2024 Jul;25(7):105001. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.03.112. Epub 2024 Apr 22.

本文引用的文献

3
7
Epidemiology of the Homebound Population in the United States.美国居家人口的流行病学
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Jul;175(7):1180-6. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.1849.
10
Family caregivers of people with dementia.痴呆症患者的家庭护理人员。
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2009;11(2):217-28. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2009.11.2/hbrodaty.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验