Suppr超能文献

居家初级保健对居家老年患者结局的影响:一项随机临床试验。

Outcomes of home-based primary care for homebound older adults: A randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.

Hartford Institute for Geriatric Nursing, NYU Rory Meyers College of Nursing, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Feb;71(2):443-454. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17999. Epub 2022 Aug 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Homebound older adults are medically complex and often have difficulty accessing outpatient medical care. Home-based primary care (HBPC) may improve care and outcomes for this population but data from randomized trials of HBPC in the United States are limited.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized controlled trial of HBPC versus office-based primary care for adults ages ≥65 years who reported ≥1 hospitalization in the prior 12 months and met the Medicare definition of homebound. HBPC was provided by teams consisting of a physician, nurse practitioner, nurse, and social worker. Data were collected at baseline, 6- and 12-months. Outcomes were quality of life, symptoms, satisfaction with care, hospitalizations, and emergency department (ED) visits. Recruitment was terminated early because more deaths were observed for intervention patients.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 229 patients, 65.4% of planned recruitment. The mean age was 82 (9.0) years and 72.3% had dementia. Of those assigned to HBPC, 34.2% never received it. Intervention patients had greater satisfaction with care than controls (2.26, 95% CI 1.46-3.06, p < 0.0001; effect size 0.74) and lower hospitalization rates (-17.9%, 95% CI -31.0% to -1.0%; p = 0.001; number needed to treat 6, 95% CI 3-100). There were no significant differences in quality of life (1.25, 95% CI -0.39-2.89, p = 0.13), symptom burden (-1.92, 95% CI -5.22-1.37, p = 0.25) or ED visits (1.2%, 95% CI -10.5%-12.4%; p = 0.87). There were 24 (21.1%) deaths among intervention patients and 12 (10.7%) among controls (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

HBPC was associated with greater satisfaction with care and lower hospitalization rates but also more deaths compared to office-based primary care. Additional research is needed to understand the nature of the higher death rate for HBPC patients, as well as to determine the effects of HBPC on quality of life and symptom burden given the trial's early termination.

摘要

背景

行动不便的老年患者病情复杂,往往难以获得门诊医疗服务。家庭为基础的初级保健(HBPC)可能改善这一人群的护理和结局,但美国 HBPC 的随机试验数据有限。

方法

我们对年龄≥65 岁、在过去 12 个月内至少住院 1 次且符合医疗保险规定的行动不便标准的成年人进行了 HBPC 与基于办公室的初级保健的随机对照试验。HBPC 由由医生、护士从业者、护士和社会工作者组成的团队提供。在基线、6 个月和 12 个月时收集数据。结局为生活质量、症状、护理满意度、住院和急诊部(ED)就诊。由于干预组患者的死亡率更高,故提前终止了招募。

结果

该研究共纳入 229 名患者,占计划招募人数的 65.4%。平均年龄为 82(9.0)岁,72.3%有痴呆症。在被分配到 HBPC 的患者中,有 34.2%从未接受过该治疗。与对照组相比,干预组患者对护理的满意度更高(2.26,95%CI 1.46-3.06,p<0.0001;效应大小 0.74),住院率更低(-17.9%,95%CI -31.0%至-1.0%;p=0.001;需要治疗的人数为 6,95%CI 3-100)。生活质量(1.25,95%CI -0.39-2.89,p=0.13)、症状负担(-1.92,95%CI -5.22-1.37,p=0.25)或 ED 就诊(1.2%,95%CI -10.5%-12.4%;p=0.87)无显著差异。干预组有 24 例(21.1%)死亡,对照组有 12 例(10.7%)死亡(p<0.0001)。

结论

与基于办公室的初级保健相比,HBPC 与更高的护理满意度和更低的住院率相关,但也与更高的死亡率相关。需要进一步研究以了解 HBPC 患者更高死亡率的性质,并确定 HBPC 对生活质量和症状负担的影响,鉴于该试验提前终止。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a6c/9939556/be87d4e04a1b/nihms-1828640-f0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验