Innovation Center Computer Assisted Surgery, Institute at the Faculty of Medicine, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Appl Clin Inform. 2021 Oct;12(5):1082-1090. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1739519. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
This study set out to obtain a general profile of physician time expenditure and electronic health record (EHR) limitations in a large university medical center in Germany. We also aim to illustrate the merit of a tool allowing for easier capture and prioritization of specific clinical needs at the point of care for which the current study will inform development in subsequent work.
Nineteen physicians across six different departments participated in this study. Direct clinical observations were conducted with 13 out of 19 physicians for a total of 2,205 minutes, and semistructured interviews were conducted with all participants. During observations, time was measured for larger activity categories (searching information, reading information, documenting information, patient interaction, calling, and others). Semistructured interviews focused on perceived limitations, frustrations, and desired improvements regarding the EHR environment.
Of the observed time, 37.1% was spent interacting with the health records (9.0% searching, 7.7% reading, and 20.5% writing), 28.0% was spent interacting with patients corrected for EHR use (26.9% of time in a patient's presence), 6.8% was spent calling, and 28.1% was spent on other activities. Major themes of discontent were a spread of patient information, high and often repeated documentation burden, poor integration of (new) information into workflow, limits in information exchange, and the impact of such problems on patient interaction. Physicians stated limited means to address such issues at the point of care.
In the study hospital, over one-third of physicians' time was spent interacting with the EHR, environment, with many aspects of used systems far from optimal and no convenient way for physicians to address issues as they occur at the point of care. A tool facilitating easier identification and registration of issues, as they occur, may aid in generating a more complete overview of limitations in the EHR environment.
本研究旨在获取德国一家大型大学医学中心医生时间支出和电子健康记录(EHR)限制的总体概况。我们还旨在说明一种工具的优点,该工具允许在护理点更轻松地捕捉和优先处理特定的临床需求,而当前的研究将为后续工作的发展提供信息。
本研究共有 19 名来自六个不同科室的医生参与。对其中 13 名医生进行了 2205 分钟的直接临床观察,并对所有参与者进行了半结构化访谈。在观察过程中,对较大的活动类别(搜索信息、阅读信息、记录信息、医患互动、呼叫和其他)进行了时间测量。半结构化访谈侧重于对 EHR 环境的感知限制、挫败感和改进需求。
观察到的时间中,37.1%用于与健康记录交互(9.0%用于搜索,7.7%用于阅读,20.5%用于记录),28.0%用于与患者交互(EHR 使用校正后,26.9%的时间在患者身边),6.8%用于呼叫,28.1%用于其他活动。不满的主要主题是患者信息的分散、高且经常重复的文档负担、(新)信息与工作流程的整合不佳、信息交换受限以及这些问题对医患互动的影响。医生表示,在护理点解决这些问题的手段有限。
在研究医院,超过三分之一的医生时间用于与 EHR 环境交互,许多使用系统的方面远非理想,医生也没有方便的方法在护理点解决问题。一种方便在问题发生时更轻松地识别和记录问题的工具,可能有助于更全面地了解 EHR 环境的限制。