Faculty of Sports and Nutrition, Faculty of Health, Center of Expertise Urban Vitality, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of General Practice, Intellectual Disability Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2022 Mar;66(3):240-249. doi: 10.1111/jir.12907. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
There is no widely used instrument to detect frailty in people with intellectual disabilities (IDs). We aimed to develop and validate a shorter and more practical version of a published frailty index for people with IDs.
This study was part of the longitudinal 'Healthy Ageing and Intellectual Disability' study. We included 982 people with IDs aged 50 years and over. The previously developed and validated ID-Frailty Index consisting of 51 deficits was used as the basis for the shortened version, the ID-FI Short Form. Content of the ID-FI Short Form was based on statistics and clinical and practical feasibility. We evaluated the precision and validity of the ID-FI Short Form using the internal consistency, the correlation between the ID-FI Short Form and the original ID-Frailty Index, the agreement in dividing participants in the categories non-frail, pre-frail and frail, and the association with survival.
Seventeen deficits from the original ID-Frailty Index were selected for inclusion in the ID-FI Short Form. All deficits of the ID-FI Short Form are clinically and practically feasible to assess for caregivers and therapists supporting people with ID. We showed acceptable internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha of 0.75. The Pearson correlation between the ID-Frailty Index and the ID-FI Short Form was excellent (r = 0.94, P < 0.001). We observed a good agreement between the full and short forms in dividing the participants in the frailty categories, with a kappa statistic of 0.63. The ID-FI Short Form was associated with survival; with every 1/100 increase on the ID-FI Short Form, the mortality probability increased by 7% (hazard ratio 1.07, P < 0.001).
The first validation of the ID-FI Short Form shows it to be a promising, practical tool to assess the frailty status of people with ID.
目前尚无广泛用于检测智力障碍(ID)人群虚弱的工具。我们旨在开发和验证已发表的 ID 虚弱指数的更短且更实用的版本。
这项研究是纵向“健康老龄化和智力障碍”研究的一部分。我们纳入了 982 名年龄在 50 岁及以上的 ID 人群。先前开发和验证的包含 51 项缺陷的 ID-虚弱指数被用作缩短版本的基础,即 ID-FI 简化版。ID-FI 简化版的内容基于统计数据和临床及实际可行性。我们使用内部一致性、ID-FI 简化版与原始 ID-虚弱指数之间的相关性、将参与者分为非虚弱、虚弱前期和虚弱组的一致性以及与生存的相关性来评估 ID-FI 简化版的准确性和有效性。
从原始 ID-虚弱指数中选择了 17 项缺陷纳入 ID-FI 简化版。ID-FI 简化版的所有缺陷都便于支持 ID 人群的护理人员和治疗师进行临床和实际评估。我们显示出可接受的内部一致性,克朗巴赫 α 值为 0.75。ID-虚弱指数和 ID-FI 简化版之间的皮尔逊相关系数非常好(r=0.94,P<0.001)。我们观察到在将参与者分为虚弱类别时,完整和简化形式之间具有良好的一致性,kappa 统计量为 0.63。ID-FI 简化版与生存相关;ID-FI 简化版每增加 1/100,死亡率增加 7%(风险比 1.07,P<0.001)。
对 ID-FI 简化版的首次验证表明,它是评估 ID 人群虚弱状态的一种有前途的实用工具。