Department of Molecular Genetics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, Center for Pharmacogenomics, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Hematol Oncol. 2022 Apr;40(2):233-242. doi: 10.1002/hon.2959. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
We aim to determine the cumulative and comparative risk of cardiovascular events associated with different Immunomodulatory Drugs (iMiDs) and Proteasome Inhibitor (PIs) in Multiple Myeloma (MM) patients through pairwise and network meta-analysis. Electronic searches were conducted using Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Clinical Trial Registry (Clinical Trials.gov) up to May 2021. Phase 3 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) reporting cardiotoxicity in MM patients (newly diagnoses and/or relapsed) treated with iMiD and/or PI. Studies, where iMiD or PI was used alongside the chemotherapy versus placebo or no additional drugs (control) in the other arm were included. The primary outcome was the presence of cardiotoxicity after follow-up. Pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis were performed using the frequentist's approach to estimate the odds ratio (OR). Twenty RCTs with 10,373 MM patients were included in this analysis. Eleven studies compared iMiDs with control, seven studies compared PIs with control, and two studies compared bortezomib against carfilzomib. CTACE high-grade (≥grade 3) cardiotoxic events were increased with iMiDs compared to their control counterpart (OR 2.05; 95% CI 1.30-3.26). Similar high-grade cardiotoxicity was also noted more frequently with PI use when compared to the control group (OR 1.67; 95% CI 1.17-2.40). Among the PIs, carfilzomib was associated with a maximum risk of cardiotoxicity (OR 2.68; 95% CI 1.63-4.40). There was no evidence of publication bias among studies. iMiDs and PIs, particularly carfilzomib, appear to be associated with increased risk of high-grade cardiovascular events in MM patients.
我们旨在通过成对和网络荟萃分析来确定多发性骨髓瘤 (MM) 患者使用不同免疫调节药物 (iMiD) 和蛋白酶体抑制剂 (PI) 相关的心血管事件的累积和比较风险。通过 Ovid MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、Web of Science 和临床试验注册处 (ClinicalTrials.gov) 进行电子检索,检索时间截至 2021 年 5 月。纳入了报道 MM 患者 (新诊断和/或复发) 使用 iMiD 和/或 PI 治疗后发生心脏毒性的 III 期随机临床试验 (RCT)。研究中,iMiD 或 PI 与化疗联合使用的手臂与安慰剂或无其他药物 (对照) 相比,或者在另一个手臂中单独使用 iMiD 或 PI 与对照相比。主要结局是随访后出现心脏毒性的情况。使用似然比法进行成对荟萃分析和网络荟萃分析,以估计比值比 (OR)。本分析共纳入 20 项 RCT,涉及 10373 例 MM 患者。11 项研究比较了 iMiD 与对照,7 项研究比较了 PI 与对照,2 项研究比较了硼替佐米与卡非佐米。与对照相比,iMiD 导致 CTACE 高级 (≥3 级) 心脏毒性事件的发生率增加 (OR 2.05;95%CI 1.30-3.26)。与对照组相比,PI 也更频繁地发生高级心脏毒性 (OR 1.67;95%CI 1.17-2.40)。在 PI 中,卡非佐米与心脏毒性的最大风险相关 (OR 2.68;95%CI 1.63-4.40)。研究之间没有发表偏倚的证据。iMiD 和 PI,特别是卡非佐米,似乎与 MM 患者发生高级心血管事件的风险增加相关。