Yale University.
Princeton University.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2022 Feb 1;34(3):532-549. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01809.
Classic taxonomies of memory distinguish explicit and implicit memory systems, placing motor skills squarely in the latter branch. This assertion is in part a consequence of foundational discoveries showing significant motor learning in amnesics. Those findings suggest that declarative memory processes in the medial temporal lobe (MTL) do not contribute to motor learning. Here, we revisit this issue, testing an individual (L. S. J.) with severe MTL damage on four motor learning tasks and comparing her performance to age-matched controls. Consistent with previous findings in amnesics, we observed that L. S. J. could improve motor performance despite having significantly impaired declarative memory. However, she tended to perform poorly relative to age-matched controls, with deficits apparently related to flexible action selection. Further supporting an action selection deficit, L. S. J. fully failed to learn a task that required the acquisition of arbitrary action-outcome associations. We thus propose a modest revision to the classic taxonomic model: Although MTL-dependent memory processes are not necessary for some motor learning to occur, they play a significant role in the acquisition, implementation, and retrieval of action selection strategies. These findings have implications for our understanding of the neural correlates of motor learning, the psychological mechanisms of skill, and the theory of multiple memory systems.
经典的记忆分类将外显记忆和内隐记忆系统区分开来,将运动技能明确归入后者。这种说法部分是由于基础性发现的结果,这些发现表明遗忘症患者存在显著的运动学习。这些发现表明,内侧颞叶(MTL)中的陈述性记忆过程对运动学习没有贡献。在这里,我们重新审视了这个问题,对一名患有严重 MTL 损伤的个体(L.S.J.)进行了四项运动学习任务的测试,并将她的表现与年龄匹配的对照组进行了比较。与遗忘症患者中的先前发现一致,我们观察到 L.S.J. 尽管陈述性记忆严重受损,但仍能提高运动表现。然而,她的表现相对于年龄匹配的对照组较差,缺陷显然与灵活的动作选择有关。进一步支持动作选择缺陷,L.S.J. 完全无法学习需要获得任意动作-结果关联的任务。因此,我们对经典分类模型提出了一个适度的修正:尽管 MTL 依赖的记忆过程对于某些运动学习的发生不是必需的,但它们在动作选择策略的获取、实施和检索中起着重要作用。这些发现对我们理解运动学习的神经相关性、技能的心理机制和多重记忆系统理论具有重要意义。