• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Sysmex DI-60在白细胞减少样本中的数据可重复性如何?

How Reproducible Is the Data from Sysmex DI-60 in Leukopenic Samples?

作者信息

Yoon Sumi, Hur Mina, Lee Gun Hyuk, Nam Minjeong, Kim Hanah

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul 06973, Korea.

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul 05030, Korea.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Nov 23;11(12):2173. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11122173.

DOI:10.3390/diagnostics11122173
PMID:34943409
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8700691/
Abstract

Digital morphology (DM) analyzers are widely applied in clinical practice. It is necessary to evaluate performances of DM analyzers by focusing on leukopenic samples. We evaluated the analytical performance, including precision, of a Sysmex DI-60 system (Sysmex, Kobe, Japan) on white blood cell (WBC) differentials in leukopenic samples. In a total of 40 peripheral blood smears divided into four groups according to WBC count (normal, mild, moderate, and severe leukopenia; each group = 10), we evaluated precision of WBC preclassificaiton by DI-60. %coefficients of variation (%CVs) of precision varied for each sample and for each cell class; the fewer cells per slide, the higher %CV. The overall specificity and efficiency were high for all cell classes except plasma cells (95.9-99.9% and 90.0-99.4%, respectively). The largest absolute value of mean difference between DI-60 and manual count in each group was: 10.77, normal; 10.22, mild leukopenia; 19.09, moderate leukopenia; 47.74, severe leukopenia. This is the first study that evaluated the analytical performance of DI-60 on WBC differentials in leukopenic samples as the main subject. DI-60 showed significantly different performance depending on WBC count. DM analyzers should be evaluated separately in leukopenic samples, even if the overall performance was acceptable.

摘要

数字形态学(DM)分析仪在临床实践中得到广泛应用。有必要通过关注白细胞减少样本评估DM分析仪的性能。我们评估了Sysmex DI - 60系统(Sysmex,日本神户)在白细胞减少样本中白细胞(WBC)分类方面的分析性能,包括精密度。在总共40份外周血涂片样本中,根据白细胞计数分为四组(正常、轻度、中度和重度白细胞减少;每组10份),我们评估了DI - 60对白细胞预分类的精密度。精密度的变异系数百分比(%CVs)因每个样本和每个细胞类别而异;每张玻片上的细胞越少,%CV越高。除浆细胞外,所有细胞类别的总体特异性和效率都很高(分别为95.9 - 99.9%和90.0 - 99.4%)。每组中DI - 60与手工计数之间平均差异的最大绝对值为:正常组10.77;轻度白细胞减少组10.22;中度白细胞减少组19.09;重度白细胞减少组47.74。这是第一项以白细胞减少样本中白细胞分类为主要研究对象评估DI - 60分析性能的研究。DI - 60的性能根据白细胞计数显示出显著差异。即使总体性能可以接受,DM分析仪在白细胞减少样本中也应单独评估。

相似文献

1
How Reproducible Is the Data from Sysmex DI-60 in Leukopenic Samples?Sysmex DI-60在白细胞减少样本中的数据可重复性如何?
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Nov 23;11(12):2173. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11122173.
2
Digital Morphology Analyzer Sysmex DI-60 vs. Manual Counting for White Blood Cell Differentials in Leukopenic Samples: A Comparative Assessment of Risk and Turnaround Time.Sysmex DI-60 全自动数字形态学分析仪与人工镜检在白细胞减少症样本中的白细胞分类比较:风险和周转时间的评估。
Ann Lab Med. 2022 Jul 1;42(4):398-405. doi: 10.3343/alm.2022.42.4.398.
3
Performance evaluation of the digital morphology analyser Sysmex DI-60 for white blood cell differentials in abnormal samples.Sysmex DI-60 数字形态分析仪在异常样本白细胞分类中的性能评估。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 21;14(1):14344. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65427-0.
4
Performance Assessment of Sysmex DI-60: Is Digital Morphology Analyzer Reliable for White Blood Cell Differentials in Body Fluids?Sysmex DI-60的性能评估:数字形态分析仪对体液中白细胞分类是否可靠?
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Mar 11;14(6):592. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14060592.
5
Performance of automated digital cell imaging analyzer Sysmex DI-60.Sysmex DI-60自动数字细胞成像分析仪的性能
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017 Nov 27;56(1):94-102. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2017-0132.
6
Red and white blood cell morphology characterization and hands-on time analysis by the digital cell imaging analyzer DI-60.使用数字细胞成像分析仪 DI-60 进行红细胞和白细胞形态特征分析及实操时间分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 27;17(4):e0267638. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267638. eCollection 2022.
7
Performance of digital morphology analyzer Vision Pro on white blood cell differentials.数字形态分析仪 Vision Pro 在白细胞分类中的性能。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2021 Jan 20;59(6):1099-1106. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-1701. Print 2021 May 26.
8
Performance comparison of two automated digital morphology analyzers for leukocyte differential in patients with malignant hematological diseases: Mindray MC-80 and Sysmex DI-60.两种自动化数字形态分析仪在恶性血液病患者白细胞分类中的性能比较:迈瑞 MC-80 和希森美康 DI-60。
Int J Lab Hematol. 2024 Jun;46(3):457-465. doi: 10.1111/ijlh.14227. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
9
Analytical performance of the digital morphology analyzer Sysmex DI-60 for body fluid cell differential counts.Sysmex DI-60 数字形态分析仪在体液细胞分类计数中的分析性能。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 27;18(7):e0288551. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288551. eCollection 2023.
10
White blood cell differential counts in severely leukopenic samples: a comparative analysis of different solutions available in modern laboratory hematology.严重白细胞减少样本中的白细胞分类计数:现代实验室血液学中不同可用溶液的比较分析
Blood Res. 2014 Jun;49(2):120-6. doi: 10.5045/br.2014.49.2.120. Epub 2014 Jun 25.

引用本文的文献

1
The Diagnostic Performance of the Cellavision DC-1 Digital Morphology Analyser on Leukaemia Samples.Cellavision DC-1数字形态分析仪对白血病样本的诊断性能
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Aug 13;15(16):2029. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15162029.
2
Advantages of AI-based whole blood film scanning for blast detection in markedly leucopenic blood films.基于人工智能的全血涂片扫描在显著白细胞减少的血涂片中检测原始细胞的优势。
Ann Hematol. 2025 Jul 15. doi: 10.1007/s00277-025-06473-0.
3
Real-World Application of Digital Morphology Analyzers: Practical Issues and Challenges in Clinical Laboratories.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of Scopio Labs X100 Full Field PBS: The first high-resolution full field viewing of peripheral blood specimens combined with artificial intelligence-based morphological analysis.评价 Scopio Labs X100 全视野 PBS:首次实现外周血标本的高分辨率全视野观察,并结合基于人工智能的形态学分析。
Int J Lab Hematol. 2021 Dec;43(6):1408-1416. doi: 10.1111/ijlh.13681. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
2
The added value of digital morphological analysis in the evaluation of peripheral blood films: the report of an UKNEQAS external quality assessment sample.数字形态分析在外周血涂片评估中的附加值:一份英国国家外部质量评估样本报告
Ann Hematol. 2022 Mar;101(3):729-730. doi: 10.1007/s00277-021-04595-9. Epub 2021 Jul 10.
3
数字形态分析仪的实际应用:临床实验室中的实际问题与挑战
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Mar 10;15(6):677. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15060677.
4
Performance of the automated digital cell image analyzer UIMD PBIA in white blood cell classification: a comparative study with sysmex DI-60.自动数字细胞图像分析仪UIMD PBIA在白细胞分类中的性能:与Sysmex DI-60的对比研究
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2025 Jan 23;63(7):1409-1418. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2024-1323. Print 2025 Jun 26.
5
Performance evaluation of the digital morphology analyser Sysmex DI-60 for white blood cell differentials in abnormal samples.Sysmex DI-60 数字形态分析仪在异常样本白细胞分类中的性能评估。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 21;14(1):14344. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65427-0.
6
Performance Assessment of Sysmex DI-60: Is Digital Morphology Analyzer Reliable for White Blood Cell Differentials in Body Fluids?Sysmex DI-60的性能评估:数字形态分析仪对体液中白细胞分类是否可靠?
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Mar 11;14(6):592. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14060592.
7
Analytical performance of the digital morphology analyzer Sysmex DI-60 for body fluid cell differential counts.Sysmex DI-60 数字形态分析仪在体液细胞分类计数中的分析性能。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 27;18(7):e0288551. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288551. eCollection 2023.
8
Digital Morphology Analyzer Sysmex DI-60 vs. Manual Counting for White Blood Cell Differentials in Leukopenic Samples: A Comparative Assessment of Risk and Turnaround Time.Sysmex DI-60 全自动数字形态学分析仪与人工镜检在白细胞减少症样本中的白细胞分类比较:风险和周转时间的评估。
Ann Lab Med. 2022 Jul 1;42(4):398-405. doi: 10.3343/alm.2022.42.4.398.
Performance of digital morphology analyzer Vision Pro on white blood cell differentials.
数字形态分析仪 Vision Pro 在白细胞分类中的性能。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2021 Jan 20;59(6):1099-1106. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-1701. Print 2021 May 26.
4
Laboratory practices for manual blood film review: Results of an IQMH patterns of practice survey.手工血片复查的实验室实践:IQMH 实践模式调查结果。
Int J Lab Hematol. 2021 Apr;43(2):184-190. doi: 10.1111/ijlh.13343. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
5
Multicentric evaluation of analytical performances digital morphology with respect to the reference methods by manual optical microscopy.
J Clin Pathol. 2020 Sep 14. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2020-206857.
6
Evaluation of the CellaVision Advanced RBC Application for Detecting Red Blood Cell Morphological Abnormalities.评估 CellaVision 高级 RBC 应用程序检测红细胞形态异常的能力。
Ann Lab Med. 2021 Jan;41(1):44-50. doi: 10.3343/alm.2021.41.1.44. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
7
Rebuttal of a paper submitted by Hans-Inge Bengtsson.对汉斯-英格·本特松提交的一篇论文的反驳。
Int J Lab Hematol. 2020 Oct;42(5):e216-e217. doi: 10.1111/ijlh.13279. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
8
Could the UKNEQAS program "Manual Differential Blood Count" be performed by the use of an automated digital morphology analyzer (Sysmex DI-60)? A feasibility study.英国国家外部质量评估计划(UKNEQAS)的“手工白细胞分类计数”能否通过使用自动数字形态分析仪(Sysmex DI-60)来完成?一项可行性研究。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Jul 3;59(4):e161-e164. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-0627. Print 2021 Mar 26.
9
Digital morphology analyzers in hematology: ICSH review and recommendations.血液学中的数字形态分析仪:国际血液学标准化委员会的回顾与建议。
Int J Lab Hematol. 2019 Aug;41(4):437-447. doi: 10.1111/ijlh.13042. Epub 2019 May 2.
10
Comparison of three staining methods in the automated digital cell imaging analyzer Sysmex DI-60.
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018 Nov 27;56(12):e280-e283. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2018-0539.