Suppr超能文献

食品基质和干扰微生物数量对传统方法及VIDAS测定的影响。 (注:原文中“by Conventional Methods and VIDAS”前面似乎缺失了要测定的具体物质,这里按字面意思翻译)

Influence of Food Matrices and the Population of Interfering Microorganisms on the Determination of by Conventional Methods and VIDAS.

作者信息

Estévez Maribel, García-Viejo Fernando, López-Mendoza Mª Carmen, Jordano Rafael, Medina Luis M

机构信息

Department of Food Science and Technology, Campus of Rabanales, University of Córdoba, Ctra. NIV, km 396a, E-14071 Córdoba, Spain.

Public Health Laboratory, Delegación Provincial de Salud, E-14071 Córdoba, Spain.

出版信息

Foods. 2021 Dec 6;10(12):3021. doi: 10.3390/foods10123021.

Abstract

In this study, the possible influence of the food matrix and the interfering population of microorganisms on the detection and count of in three common foods of the Spanish diet (Spanish omelette, fresh cheese and vegetable salad) was determined. Four groups were assayed: one control, two groups with interfering microorganisms ( Enteritidis, and ) with different levels of and a final group only contaminated with . The samples were analyzed with the normalized method (UNE-EN ISO 11290:2018) and with an alternative technique (VIDAS). The results show that the presence of interfering microorganisms did not seem to interfere with the determination of . Furthermore, the type of food did not seem to influence the determination of , but the culture media used showed differences. In fact, regardless of the type of food, the ALOA medium showed higher sensitivity than the other media, with higher recovery in 100% of samples (only for the Spanish omelette in Group B was the result the same as that for PALCAM, -8.11 log cfu/g). The results obtained using the VIDAS were not influenced by any of the factors or conditions used and show 100% efficiency.

摘要

在本研究中,确定了食物基质和干扰性微生物群体对西班牙饮食中三种常见食物(西班牙煎蛋饼、新鲜奶酪和蔬菜沙拉)中[具体微生物名称未给出]检测和计数的可能影响。检测了四组样本:一组为对照组,两组含有不同水平[具体干扰微生物名称未给出]的干扰性微生物(肠炎沙门氏菌、[具体微生物名称未给出]和[具体微生物名称未给出]),最后一组仅受[具体微生物名称未给出]污染。采用标准化方法(UNE-EN ISO 11290:2018)和一种替代技术(VIDAS)对样本进行分析。结果表明,干扰性微生物的存在似乎并未干扰[具体微生物名称未给出]的测定。此外,食物类型似乎并未影响[具体微生物名称未给出]的测定,但所用培养基显示出差异。事实上,无论食物类型如何,ALOA培养基均比其他培养基具有更高的灵敏度,在100%的样本中回收率更高(仅B组西班牙煎蛋饼的结果与PALCAM相同,为-8.11 log cfu/g)。使用VIDAS获得的结果不受所用任何因素或条件的影响,且效率为100%。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验